Near-synonym lexical choice in latent semantic space

Coling 2010 - 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 1182-1190

  Wang, Tong ^a   Hirst, Graeme ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CO-OCCURRENCE; HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; LATENT SEMANTICS; LEARNING MODELS; LEXICAL CHOICE; LEXICAL LEVEL; SEMANTIC SPACE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 80053431181     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Charles L. A. Clarke, Gordon Cormack, and Christopher Palmer. An overview of MultiText. ACM SIGIR Forum, 32(2):14-15, 1998. (Pubitemid 128614787)
2. D. A. Cruse. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press, 1986.
3. Scott Deerwester, Susan Dumais, George Furnas, Thomas Landauer, and Richard Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6):391-407, 1990.
4. Chrysanne DiMarco, Graeme Hirst, and Manfred Stede. The semantic and stylistic differentiation of synonyms and near-synonyms. AAAI Spring Symposium on Building Lexicons for Machine Translation, pages 114-121, 1993.
5. Philip Edmonds. Choosing the word most typical in context using a lexical co-occurrence network. In Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and Eighth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 507-509, 1997.
6. Philip Edmonds and Graeme Hirst. Nearsynonymy and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics, 28(2):105-144, 2002.
7. Diana Inkpen. A statistical model for nearsynonym choice. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing, 4(1):1-17, 2007.
8. Diana Inkpen and Graeme Hirst. Building and using a lexical knowledge-base of near-synonym differences. Computational Linguistics, 32(2): 223-262, 2006.
9. Aminul Islam and Diana Inkpen. Near-synonym choice using a 5-gram language model. Research in Computing Sciences, 46:41-52, 2010.
10. Thomas Landauer and Susan Dumais. A solution to Plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2):211-240, 1997.
11. Shixiao Ouyang, Helena Hong Gao, and Soo Ngee Koh. Developing a computerfacilitated tool for acquiring near-synonyms in Chinese and English. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Computational Semantics, pages 316-319, 2009.
12. Reinhard Rapp. The automatic generation of thesauri of related words for English, French, German, and Russian. International Journal of Speech Technology, 11(3):147-156, 2008.
13. Ehud Reiter and Somayajulu Sripada. Human variation and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics, 28(4):545-553, 2002.
14. Manfred Stede. Lexical choice criteria in language generation. In Proceedings of the sixth conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 454-459, 1993.