Adding syntax to dynamic programming for aligning comparable texts for the generation of paraphrases

COLING/ACL 2006 - 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference Poster Sessions

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 747-754

  Shen, Siwei ^a   Radev, Dragomir R ^a   Patel, Agam ^a   Erkan, Güneş ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; MACHINE TRANSLATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SYNTACTICS;

MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENTS; NATURAL LANGUAGES; PARALLEL CORPORA; PARALLEL TEXT; PARAPHRASE IDENTIFICATIONS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT TECHNIQUES; SYNTACTIC FEATURES; SYNTACTIC INFORMATION; TEXT GENERATIONS;

ALIGNMENT;

EID: 80053428018     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Regina Barzilay and Lillian Lee. 2002. Bootstrapping Lexical Choice via Multiple-Sequence Alignment. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2002, Philadelphia.
2. Regina Barzilay and Lillian Lee. 2003. Learning to Paraphrase: An Unsupervised Approach Using Multiple-Sequence Alignment. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT03, Edmonton.
3. Sabine Buchholz. 2000. Readme for perl script chunklink.pl. http://ilk.uvt.nl/sabine/chunklink/README.html.
4. Richard Durbin, Sean R. Eddy, Anders Krogh, and Graeme Mitchison. 1998. Biological Sequence Analysis. Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press.
5. Joseph Felsenstein. 1995. PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package. http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html.
6. DF. Feng and Russell F. Doolittle. 1987. Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 25(4).
7. Walter M. Fitch and Emanuel Margoliash. 1967. Construction of Phylogenetic Trees. Science, 155(3760):279-284, January.
8. Dan Gusfield, 1997. Algorithms On Strings: A Dual View from Computer Science and Computational Molecular Biology. Cambridge University Press.
9. Bo Pang, Kevin Knight, and Daniel Marcu. 2003. Syntax-based Alignment of Multiple Translations: Extracting Paraphrases and Generating New Sentences. In Proceedings of HLT/NAACL 2003, Edmonton, Canada.
10. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2001. BLEU: A Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. Research Report RC22176, IBM.
11. Chris Quirk, Chris Brockett, and William Dolan. 2004. Monolingual machine translation for paraphrase generation. In Dekang Lin and Dekai Wu, editors, Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, pages 142-149, Barcelona, Spain, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. A Ratnaparkhi. 1998. Maximum Entropy Models for Natural Language Ambiguity Resolution. Phd. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
13. Erik F. Tjong Kim Sang and Jorn Veenstra. 1999. Representing text chunks. In EACL, pages 173-179.