Increasing the rigour and trustworthiness of participatory evaluations: Learnings from the field

Evaluation Journal of Australasia

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 27-35

  Lennie, June ^a,b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b Queensland branch of the AES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053411381     PISSN: 1035719X     EISSN: 25159372     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1035719X0600600105     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Diez M., 2001, ‘The evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies: towards a participatory approach’, European Planning Studies, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 907–923
2. Dick B., 1992, ‘Qualitative action research: improving the rigour and economy’, Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Action Learning, University of Queensland, Brisbane, pp. 432–435
3. Dick B., 1999, ‘Sources of rigour in action research: addressing the issues of trustworthiness and credibility’, paper presented at the Association for Qualitative Research Conference, Melbourne, Victoria, 6-10 July, viewed at
4. Dugan M., 1996, ‘Participatory and empowerment evaluation: lessons learned in training and technical assistance’, in Fetterman D, Kaftarian S, & Wandersman A, (eds), Empowerment evaluation: knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage, pp. 277–303
5. Fetterman D., & Wandersman A., (eds) 2005, Empowerment evaluation: principles in practice, The Guilford Press., New York
6. Fonow M., & Cook J., 1991, ‘Back to the future: a look at the second wave of feminist epistemology and methodology’, in Fonow M, & Cook J, (eds), Beyond methodology: feminist scholarship as lived research, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiania, pp. 1–15
7. Gregory A., 2000, ‘Problematising participation: a critical review of approaches to participation in evaluation theory’, Evaluation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 179–199
8. Guba E., & Lincoln Y., 1989, Fourth generation evaluation, Sage, Newbury Park, California
9. Humphries B., 1994, ‘Empowerment and social research: elements for an analytic framework’, in Humphries B, & Truman C, (eds), Re-thinking social research: anti-discriminatory approaches in research methodology, Avebury, Aldershot, UK, pp. 185–204
10. Lather P., 1991, Getting smart: feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern, Routledge, New York
11. Lennie J., 2001, ‘Troubling empowerment: an evaluation and critique of a feminist action research project involving rural women and interactive communication technologies’, PhD thesis, The Communication Centre, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
12. Lennie J., 2002a, ‘Rural women's empowerment in a communication technology project: some contradictory effects’, Rural Society, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 224–245
13. Lennie J., 2002b, ‘Including a diversity of rural women in a communication technology access project: taking the macro and micro contexts into account’, in Johanson G., & Stillman L., (eds), Proceedings, Electronic Networks—Building Community: 5th Community Networking Conference, Monash University, Melbourne, 3-5 July
14. Lennie J., 2005, ‘An evaluation capacity-building process for sustainable community IT initiatives: empowering and disempowering impacts’, Evaluation, vol. 11 no. 4, pp. 390–414
15. Lennie J., Hatcher C., & Morgan M., 2003, ‘Feminist discourses of (dis)empowerment in an action research project involving rural women and communication technologies’, Action Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 57–80
16. Lennie J., Hearn G., Simpson L., Kennedy da Silva E., Kimber M., & Hanrahan M., 2004, Building community capacity in evaluating IT projects: outcomes of the LEARNERS project, Creative Industries Research and Applications Centre and Service Leadership and Innovation Research Program, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, viewed at
17. Martin M., 2000, ‘Critical education for participatory research’, in Truman C, Mertens D, & Humphries B, (eds), Research and inequality, UCL Press, New York, pp. 191–204
18. Mathie A., & Greene J., 1997, ‘Stakeholder participation in evaluation: how important is diversity?’, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 279–285
19. Mayoux L., & Chambers R., 2005, ‘Reversing the paradigm: quantification, participatory methods and pro-poor impact assessment’, Journal of International Development, vol. 17, pp. 271–298
20. McKie L., 2003, ‘Rhetorical spaces: participation and pragmatism in the evaluation of community health work’, Evaluation, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 307–324
21. McTaggart R., 1991, ‘Principles for participatory action research’, Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 168–187
22. O'Meara P., Chester J., & Han G-S, 2004, ‘Outside—looking in: evaluating a community capacity building project’, Rural Society, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 126–141
23. Papineau D., & Kiely M., 1996, ‘Participatory evaluation in a community organization: fostering stakeholder empowerment and utilization’, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 79–93
24. Parks W., 2005, Who measures change: an introduction to participatory monitoring and evaluation of communication for social change, Communication for Social Change Consortium, New Jersey
25. Rebien C., 1996, ‘Participatory evaluation of development assistance’, Evaluation, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 151–171
26. Sirotnik K., & Oakes J., 1990, ‘Evaluation as critical inquiry: school improvement as a case in point’, in Sirotnik K, (ed.), Evaluation and social justice: issues in public education, Jossey-Bass, New York, pp. 37–59
27. Staley C., & Shockley-Zalabak P., 1989, ‘Triangulation in gender research: the need for converging methodologies’, in Carter K, & Spitzack C, (eds), Doing research on women's communication: perspectives on theory and method, Ablex, New Jersey, pp. 242–261
28. The Rural Women and ICTs Research Team 1999, The new pioneers: women in rural Queensland collaboratively exploring the potential of communication and information technologies for personal, business and community development, The Communication Centre, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
29. Thomas L., 2000, ‘Bums on seats; or “listening to voices”: evaluating widening participation initiatives using participatory action research’, Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 95–113
30. Vanderplaat M., 1995, ‘Beyond technique: issues in evaluating for empowerment’, Evaluation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–96
31. Wadsworth Y., 1997, Everyday evaluation on the run, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, New South Wales
32. Kellogg Foundation W.K., 1998, ‘How we got here: a summary of the evaluation landscape, history, paradigms, and balancing acts (Chapter 2), in WK Kellogg Foundation evaluation handbook, viewed at
33. Worthen B., Sanders J., & Fitzpatrick J., 1997, Program evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines, 2nd edn, Longman, New York