An annotation scheme for a rhetorical analysis of biology articles

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1737-1740

  Mizuta, Yoko ^a   Collier, Nigel ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATION SCHEME; CONTENT-BASED ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE; RHETORICAL ANALYSIS; SCIENTIFIC TEXTS; SIMPLE KEYWORD SEARCH; TECHNICAL DETAILS;

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

EID: 80053390419     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Craven, M. & Kumlien, J. (1999). Constructing biological knowledge bases by extracting information from text sources. In Proceedings of ISMB'99 (pp. 77-86).
2. Farkas, D.K. (1999). The logical and rhetorical construction of procedural discourse. In Technical Communications, 43(1), 42-53.
3. Hernandez, N. & Grau, B. (2003). What is this text about? Combining topic and meta-descriptors for text structure presentation. SIGDOC'03.
4. Humphreys, K., Demetriou, G. & Gaizauskas, R. (2000). Two applications of information extraction to biological science journal articles: Enzyme interactions and protein structures. BSB 2000.
5. Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-455.
6. Lehman, A. (1999). Text structuration leading to an automatic summary system. Information Processing and Management, 35(2), 181-191.
7. Mann, W.C. & Thompson, S.A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3), 243-281.
8. Marcu, D. & Echihabi, A. (2002). An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations. ACL2002.
9. Paice, C.D. & Jones, P.A. (1993) The identification of important concepts in highly structured technical papers. ACM-SIGIR.
10. Shah, P. K., Perez-Iratxeta, C. Bork, P. & Andrande, M. A. (2003). Information extraction from full text scientific articles. In BMC Bioinformatics, 4-20.
11. Swales, J. (1990) Genre analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press.
12. Tanabe, L. & Wilbur, W. (2002). Tagging gene and protein names in biomedical text. In Bioinformatics, 18, 1124-1132.
13. Teufel, S., Carletta, J. & Moens, M. (1999). An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles. EACL '99.
14. Teufel, S., & Moens, M. (1999). Argumentative classification of extracted sentences as a first step towards flexible abstracting. In Mani, I. and Maybury, M.T (eds.) (1999) Advances in automatic text summarization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Teufel, S. & Moens, M. (2002). Summarizing Scientific Articles: Experiments with Relevance and Rhetorical Status. Computational Linguistics 28(4), 409-445.
16. Teufel, S. & Moens, M. (2000). What's yours and what's mine: Determining Intellectual Attribution in Scientific Text. SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora.
17. Tischer, S., Meyer, M., Wodak R., and Vetter E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
18. van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.