Intervention for fetal distress among obstetricians, registered nurses, and residents: Similarities, differences, and determining factors

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 809-817

  Chiossi, Giuseppe ^a   Costantine, Maged M ^a   Pfannstiel, Joy M ^a   Hankins, Gary D V ^a   Saade, George R ^a   Wu, Zhao Helen ^a  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS HEART RATE; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTERED NURSE; RESIDENT; VIGNETTE;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; FETAL DISTRESS; FETAL MONITORING; HEART RATE, FETAL; HUMANS; MALE; NURSES; PHYSICIANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS;

EID: 80053377813     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822e00bc     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:450-63.
2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003;52:1-113.
3. Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD006066. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.
4. Nielsen PV, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, Nim J. Intra-and interobserver variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987;66:421-4. (Pubitemid 17165946)
5. Nelson KB, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY, Grether JK. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 1996;334:613-8. (Pubitemid 26072118)
6. Zain HA, Wright JW, Parrish GE, Diehl SJ. Interpreting the fetal heart rate tracing. Effect of knowledge of neonatal outcome. J Reprod Med 1998;43:367-70. (Pubitemid 28196438)
7. Zimmerman M, Mattia JI. The reliability and validity of a screening Questionnaire for 13 DSM-IV Axis I disorders (the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire) in psychiatric outpatients. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;60:677-83. (Pubitemid 29503648)
8. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann RL, Hill CL, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46:1006-11. (Pubitemid 19278229)
9. Jackson DN. Jackson personality inventory, revised manual. Port Huron (MI): Sigma Assessment Systems; 2004.
10. Pearson SD, Goldman L, Orav EJ, Guadagnoli E, Garcia TB, Johnson PA, et al. Triage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: do physicians' risk attitudes make the difference? J Gen Intern Med 1995;10:557-64.
11. Fuglenes D, Øian P, Kristiansen IS. Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:48.e1-8.
12. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 116: Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1232-40.
13. Ghetti C, Chan BK, Guise JM. Physicians' responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery. Birth 2004;31:280-4. (Pubitemid 41715020)
14. Kwee A, Cohlen BJ, Kanhai HH, Bruinse HW, Visser GH. Caesarean section on request: a survey in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;113:186-90. (Pubitemid 38456774)
15. Braspenning J, Sergeant J. General practitioners' decision making for mental health problems: outcomes and ecological validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:1365-72.
16. Jones TV, Gerrity MS, Earp J. Written case simulations: do they predict physicians' behavior? J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:805-15. (Pubitemid 20254101)
17. Norman GR, Feightner JW. Comparison of behaviour on simulated patients and patient management problems. Med Educ 1981;15:26-32. (Pubitemid 11015201)
18. Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203: 326.e1-10.
19. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006;367: 1819-29. (Pubitemid 43833191)
20. O'Leary CM, de Klerk N, Keogh J, Pennell C, de Groot J, York L, Mulroy S, Stanley FJ. Trends in mode of delivery during 1984-2003: can they be explained by pregnancy and delivery complications? BJOG 2007;114:855-64. (Pubitemid 46918690)
21. Xu X, Siefert KA, Jacobson PD, Lory JR, Ransom SB, The Effects of Medical Liability on Obstetric Care Supply in Michigan Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:205.e1-9.
22. Bragg F, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Mahmood TA, Templeton A, et al. Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ 2010;341:c5065.