|
Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 771-773
|
To mesh or not to mesh: Current debates in prolapse repair fueled by the u.s. food and drug administration safety notification
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL DECISION MAKING;
CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS;
DEVICE APPROVAL;
DEVICE RECALL;
DEVICE SAFETY;
EDITORIAL;
FOLLOW UP;
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
GOLD STANDARD;
HUMAN;
MESH SLING;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE;
POSTERIOR INTRAVAGINAL SLINGPLASTY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSTHESIS LOOSENING;
PUBOVAGINAL SLING;
REOPERATION;
RETRACTOR;
SACROCOLPOPEXY;
STRESS INCONTINENCE;
SURGICAL RISK;
TISSUE GRAFT;
TISSUE REPAIR;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE;
SURGICAL MESH;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
|
EID: 80053372825
PISSN: 00297844
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318230b1f4 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (10)
|