Constraint satisfaction inference: Non-probabilistic global inference for sequence labelling

EACL 2006 - 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Proceedings of the Workshop on Learning Structured Information in Natural Language Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 9-16

  Canisius, Sander ^a   Van Den Bosch, Antal ^a   Daelemans, Walter ^b  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

BASE CLASSIFIERS; CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION; LABELING METHODS; NON-PROBABILISTIC; OUTPUT SEQUENCES; PROBABILISTIC PREDICTION; SEQUENCE LABELING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053364476     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. R. H. Baayen, R. Piepenbrock, and H. van Rijn. 1993. The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia, PA.
2. W. Daelemans and A. Van den Bosch. 1996. Language-independent data-oriented grapheme-tophoneme conversion. In J. P. H. Van Santen, R. W. Sproat, J. P. Olive, and J. Hirschberg, editors, Progress in Speech Processing, pages 77-89. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
3. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, K. Van der Sloot, and A. Van den Bosch. 2004. TiMBL: Tilburg memory based learner, version 5.1.0, reference guide. Technical Report ILK 04-02, ILK Research Group, Tilburg University.
4. J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceed- ings of the 18th International Conference on Ma- chine Learning, Williamstown, MA.
5. V. Punyakanok and D. Roth. 2001. The use of classifiers in sequential inference. In NIPS-13; The 2000 Conference on Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, pages 995-1001. The MIT Press.
6. L.A. Ramshaw and M.P. Marcus. 1995. Text chunking using transformation-based learning. In Pro- ceedings of the 3rd ACL/SIGDAT Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, pages 82-94.
7. D. Roth andW. Yih. 2005. Integer linear programming inference for conditional random fields. In Proc. of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 737-744.
8. Yuka Tateisi, Hideki Mima, Ohta Tomoko, and Junichi Tsujii. 2002. Genia corpus: an annotated research abstract corpus in molecular biology domain. In Hu- man Language Technology Conference (HLT 2002), pages 73-77.
9. E. Tjong Kim Sang and S. Buchholz. 2000. Introduction to the CoNLL-2000 shared task: Chunking. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2000 and LLL-2000, pages 127-132.
10. E. Tjong Kim Sang and F. De Meulder. 2003. Introduction to the conll-2003 shared task: Languageindependent named entity recognition. In W. Daelemans and M. Osborne, editors, Proceedings of CoNLL-2003, pages 142-147. Edmonton, Canada.
11. A. Van den Bosch and W. Daelemans. 2005. Improving sequence segmentation learning by predicting trigrams. In I. Dagan and D. Gildea, editors, Pro- ceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning.
12. A. Van den Bosch. 2004. Wrapped progressive sampling search for optimizing learning algorithm parameters. In R. Verbrugge, N. Taatgen, and L. Schomaker, editors, Proceedings of the 16th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 219-226, Groningen, The Netherlands.