메뉴 건너뛰기
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1166-1167
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Effective Health Care (EHC) Program Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews: Keeping up-to-date in a rapidly evolving field
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTINUING EDUCATION; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);
EID: 80053361315     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.08.004     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (16)
References (12)
  • 1
    • 77949584345 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • AHRQ series editorial: Public involvement improves methods development in comparative effectiveness reviews
    • M. Helfand AHRQ series editorial: public involvement improves methods development in comparative effectiveness reviews J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 471 473
    • (2010) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.63 , pp. 471-473
    • Helfand, M.1
  • 2
    • 77949628081 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • AHRQ series paper 1: Comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
    • J. Slutsky, D. Atkins, and S. Chang AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 481 483
    • (2010) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.63 , pp. 481-483
    • Slutsky, J.1    Atkins, D.2    Chang, S.3
  • 3
    • 77949596386 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • AHRQ series paper 2: Principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
    • M. Helfand, and H. Balshem AHRQ series paper 2: principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 484 490
    • (2010) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.63 , pp. 484-490
    • Helfand, M.1    Balshem, H.2
  • 4
    • 77949652318 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • AHRQ series paper 3: Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
    • E. Whitlock, S. Lopez, and S. Chang AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 491 501
    • (2010) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.63 , pp. 491-501
    • Whitlock, E.1    Lopez, S.2    Chang, S.3
  • 5
    • 77949651908 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • AHRQ series paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
    • R. Chou, N. Aronson, and D. Atkins AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 502 512
    • (2010) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.63 , pp. 502-512
    • Chou, R.1    Aronson, N.2    Atkins, D.3
  • 6
    • 77949609822 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • AHRQ series paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
    • D. Owens, K. Lohr, and D. Atkins AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program J Clin Epidemiol 63 2010 513 523
    • (2010) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.63 , pp. 513-523
    • Owens, D.1    Lohr, K.2    Atkins, D.3
  • 7
    • 80053368677 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care program
    • R. Relevo, and H. Balshem Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care program J Clin Oncol 64 2011 1168 1177
    • (2011) J Clin Oncol , vol.64 , pp. 1168-1177
    • Relevo, R.1    Balshem, H.2
  • 8
    • 80053346464 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Observational studies should be considered for inclusion in reviews of comparative effectiveness
    • S.L. Norris, D. Atkins, W. Bruening, S. Fox, E. Johnson, and R. Kane Observational studies should be considered for inclusion in reviews of comparative effectiveness J Clin Oncol 64 2011 1178 1186
    • (2011) J Clin Oncol , vol.64 , pp. 1178-1186
    • Norris, S.L.1    Atkins, D.2    Bruening, W.3    Fox, S.4    Johnson, E.5    Kane, R.6
  • 10
    • 80053351531 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health care program
    • R. Fu, G. Gartlehner, M. Grant, T. Shamliyan, A. Sedrakyan, and T.J. Wilt Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health care program J Clin Oncol 64 2011 1187 1197
    • (2011) J Clin Oncol , vol.64 , pp. 1187-1197
    • Fu, R.1    Gartlehner, G.2    Grant, M.3    Shamliyan, T.4    Sedrakyan, A.5    Wilt, T.J.6
  • 11
    • 80053378573 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Current efforts for updating comparative effectiveness reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
    • Tsertsvadze A, Maglione M, Chou R, Garritty C, Coleman C, Lux L, et al. Current efforts for updating comparative effectiveness reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. J Clin Oncol 011;64:1208-15.
    • J Clin Oncol , vol.11 , Issue.64 , pp. 1208-1215
    • Tsertsvadze, A.1    Maglione, M.2    Chou, R.3    Garritty, C.4    Coleman, C.5    Lux, L.6

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.