Early phase technology management valuation practices by university licensing offices in the United States: Empirical data from a survey of the top 100 organizations

PICMET: Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Hallam, Cory R A ^a   Leffel, Anita ^a   Chinea, Ismael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL COMPONENT; EMPIRICAL DATA; FINANCIAL VALUES; LICENSING PROCESS; TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY LICENSING OFFICES; TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENTS; TECHNOLOGY RISKS;

ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; INNOVATION; INVESTMENTS; PLANNING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGY;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 80053352932     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. AUTM (2009). Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), 2009 Licensing Survey.
2. Berghe, L., Guild, P. (2008). The strategic value of new university technology and its impact on exclusivity of licensing transactions: An empirical study. Journal of Technology Transfer. Indianapolis: Feb 2008. Vol. 33, Iss. 1; p. 91.
3. Cochran, E. (2005). Methodology of an independent technology-transfer organization. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Sep 2005.
4. Debapriya, S. (2005). On the coexistence of different licensing schemes. International Review of Economics & Finance 14, no. 4, (January 1): 393-413.
5. Degnan, S. (2002). The use of conjoint analysis to establish the most important evaluation factors in technology transfer and patent licensing negotiations. Golden Gate University, 2002, 134 pages; AAT 3051442
6. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review. 14, 532 - 550.
7. Elhauge (2008). DO PATENT HOLDUP AND ROYALTY STACKING LEAD TO SYSTEMATICALLY EXCESSIVE ROYALTIES? Journal of Competition Law & Economics 4, no. 3, (September 1): 535-570.
8. Galbraith, C., Ehrlich, S., DeNoble, A. (2006). Predicting Technology Success: Identifying Key Predictors and Assessing Expert Evaluation for Advanced Technologies. Journal of Technology Transfer. Indianapolis: Nov 2006. Vol. 31, Iss. 6; p. 673.
9. Gregorio, D., Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy 32, no. 2, (February 1): 209-227.
10. Gu, F., Lev, B. (2004). The Information Content of Royalty Income. Accounting Horizons 18, no. 1, (March 1): 1-12.
11. Hoye, K., Pries, F. (2009). 'Repeat commercializers,' the 'habitual entrepreneurs' of university-industry technology transfer. Technovation, Volume 29, Issue 10, October 2009, Pages 682-689.
12. Kennedy, D. (2005). Bayh-Dole: Almost 25. Science [serial online]. 2005; 307:1375. (Pubitemid 40321905)
13. Kennedy, W. (2006). Tools and approaches to cultivate technology transfer. 2006 Technology Transfer Society Conference, September 2006. Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
14. Layne-Farrar, A., Lerner, J. (2011). To join or not to join: Examining patent pool participation and rent sharing rules. International Journal of Industrial Organization 29, no. 2, (March 1): 294.
15. Layne-Farrar, A., Schmidt, K. (2010). LICENSING COMPLEMENTARY PATENTS: ";PATENT TROLLS,"; MARKET STRUCTURE, AND ";EXCESSIVE"; ROYALTIES. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 25, no. 2, (April 1): 1121.
16. Leute, K. (2005). Patenting and Licensing of University-Based Genetic Inventions - A View from Experience at Stanford University's Office of Technology Licensing. Community Genetics. 2005. Vol. 8, Iss. 4; p. 217.
17. Leute, K. (2005). Stanford's licensing and equity practices with biotechnology companies. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 11, no. 4, (July 1): 318-324. (Pubitemid 41300302)
18. Lipinski J., Minutolo M., Crothers L. (2008). The Complex Relationship Driving Technology Transfer: The Potential Opportunities Missed by Universities. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management. 2008; 9:112-133.
19. Markman, G., Phan, P., Balkin, D., Gianiodis, P. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing. New York: Mar 2005. Vol. 20, Iss. 2; p. 241.
20. Newman, G., Gering, R., Press, J. (2008). How Reasonable Is Your Royalty? Journal of Accountancy 206, no. 3, (September 1): 56-58, 60-62, 12, 14.
21. Nicol, D. (2008). STRATEGIES FOR DISSEMINATION OF UNIVERSITY KNOWLEDGE. Health Law Journal 16, (January 1): 207-35.
22. Price, C., Huston, R., Meyers, A. (2008). A new approach to improve technology commercialisation in university medical schools. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology. London: Apr 2008. Vol. 14, Iss. 2; p. 96.
23. Rahal, A., Rabelo, L. (2006). Assessment Framework for the Evaluation and Prioritization of University Inventions for Licensing and Commercialization. Engineering Management Journal. Rolla: Dec 2006. Vol. 18, Iss. 4; p. 28.
24. *. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 10, no. 1, (September 1): 54-59 (Pubitemid 38885662)
25. Sakakibara, M. (2010). An empirical analysis of pricing in patent licensing contracts. Industrial and Corporate Change 19, no. 3, (June 1): 927.
26. Sherry, E., Teece, D. (2004). Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation. Research Policy 33, no. 2, (March 1): 179-191.
27. Swamidass, P., Vulasa, V. (2009). Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer. Indianapolis: Aug 2009. Vol. 34, Iss. 4; p. 343.
28. Thursby, J., Jensen, R., Thursby, M. (2001). Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities. Journal of Technology Transfer. Indianapolis: Jan 2001. Vol. 26, Iss. 1-2; p. 59.
29. Thursby, J., Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy. Amsterdam: Jan 2002. Vol. 31, Iss. 1; p. 109.
30. Thursby, J., Thursby, M. (2002) Who is selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Conference on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer, DEC, 2000 Georgia Inst Technol, Dupree Coll Management, Atlanta, Georgia. Management Science Volume: 48 Issue: 1 Pages: 90-104 Published: JAN 2002. (Pubitemid 34434357)