Amenity driven price effects and conservation reserve site selection: A dynamic linear integer programming approach

Ecological Economics

Volumn 70, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2225-2235

  Dissanayake, Sahan T M ^a   Önal, Hayri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Amenity price effects; Biological conservation; Integer programming; Reserve design; Site selection; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; PRICE DYNAMICS; RESERVE DESIGN; SITE SELECTION; STOCHASTICITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 80053324114     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ando A., Camm J.D., Polasky S., Solow A. Species distribution, land values and efficient conservation. Science 1998, 2792:126-2128.
2. Armsworth P.R., Daily G.C., Kareiva P., Sanchirico J.N. Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:5403-5408.
3. Balmford A., Bruner A., Cooper P., Costanza R., Farber S., Green R.E., Jenkins M., Jefferiss P., Jessamy V., Madden J., Munro K., Myers N., Naeem S., Paavola J., Rayment M., Rosendo S., Roughgarden J., Trumper K., Turner R.K. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 2002, 297:950-995.
4. Bode M., Wilson K.A., Brooks T.M., Turner W.R., Mittermeier R.A., McBride M.F., Underwood E.C., Possingham H.P. Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2008, 105:6498-6501.
5. Camm J.D., Polasky S., Solow A., Csuti B. A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection. Biological Conservation 1996, 78:353-355.
6. Cerdeira J.O., Gaston K.J., Pinto L.S. Connectivity in priority area selection for conservation. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2005, 10:183-192.
7. Church R.L., ReVelle C. The maximum covering location problem. Papers in Regional Science Association 1974, 32:101-118.
8. Church R.L., Stoms D.M., Davis F.W. Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biological Conservation 1996, 76:105-112.
9. Costello C., Polasky S. Dynamic reserve site selection. Resource and Energy Economics 2004, 26:157-174.
10. Cova T.J., Church R.L. Contiguity constraints for single-region site search problems. Geographical Analysis 2000, 32:306-329.
11. Cowling R.M., Pressey R.L., Rouget M., Lombard A.T. A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot - the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biological Conservation 2003, 112:191-216.
12. Fischer D.T., Church R.L. Clustering and compactness in reserve site selection: an extension of the biodiversity management area selection model. Forest Science. 2003, 49:555-565.
13. Haight R.G., Snyder S. Integer selection methods for reserve selection and design. Spatial Conservation Prioritization 2009, 43-56. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. A. Moilanen, K.A. Wilson, H.P. Possingham (Eds.).
14. Hanski I., Simberloff D. The metapopulation approach. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution 1997, 5-26. Academic Press, Inc, San Diego, CA. I.A. Hanski, M.E. Gilpin (Eds.).
15. Harpankar K. Reserve Selection in the presence of Economic Feedback Effects http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/21177/1/sp06ha02.pdf.
16. Harrison S. Metapopulations and conservation. Large-Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology 1994, 111-128. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford. P.J. Edwards, R.M. May, N.R. Webb (Eds.).
17. Irwin E.G. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics 2002, 78(4):465-480.
18. James A.N., Gaston K.J., Balmford A. Balancing the earth's accounts. Nature 1999, 401:323-324.
19. Kirkpatrick J.B. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 1983, 25(2):127-134.
20. Margules C.R., Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 2000, 405:243-253.
21. McConnell V., Walls M. The Value of Open Space: Evidence from Studies of Nonmarket Benefits 2005, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
22. McDonald-Madden E., Bode M., Game E.T., Grantham H., Possingham H.P. The need for speed: informed land acquisitions for conservation in a dynamic property market. Ecology Letters 2008, 11:1169-1177.
23. Meir E., Andelman S., Possingham H.P. Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world?. Ecology Letters 2004, 7:615-622.
24. Moilanen A., Ball I. Heuristic and approximate optimization methods for spatial conservation prioritization. Spatial Conservation Prioritization 2009, 58-69. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. A. Moilanen, K.A. Wilson, H.P. Possingham (Eds.).
25. Moilanen A., Cabeza M. Single-species dynamic site selection. Ecological Applications 2002, 12:913-926.
26. Naidoo R., Balmford A., Ferraro P.J., Polasky S. Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2006, 21:681-687.
27. Neumann B.C., Boyle K.J., Bell K.P. Property price effects of a national wildlife refuge: great meadows national wildlife refuge in Massachusetts. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:1011-1019.
28. Newburn D., Reed S., Berck P., Merenlender A. Economics and land-use change in prioritizing private land conservation. Conservation Biology 2005, 19:1411-1420.
29. Newburn D., Reed S., Berck P., Merenlender A. Habitat and open space at risk of land-use conversion: targeting strategies for land conservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006, 88:28-42.
30. Önal H. First-best, second-best, and heuristic solutions in conservation reserve site selection. Biological Conservation 2004, 115:55-62.
31. Önal H., Briers R.A. Selection of a minimum-boundary reserve network using integer programming. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 2003, 270:1487-1490.
32. Önal H., Briers R.A. Optimal selection of a connected reserve network. Operations Research 2006, 54:379-388.
33. Önal H., Wang Y. A graph theory approach for designing conservation reserve networks with minimal fragmentation. Networks 2008, 52:142-152.
34. Polasky S. You can't always get what you want: conservation planning with feedback effects. PNAS 2006, 103:5245-5246.
35. Possingham H.P., Wilson K.A. Biodiversity - turning up the heat on hotspots. Nature 2005, 436:919-920.
36. Possingham H.P., Ball I., Andelman S. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology 2000, 291-306. Springer, New York. S. Ferson, M. Burgman (Eds.).
37. Possingham H., Wilson K.A., Andelman S.J., Vynne C.H. Protected areas: goals, limitations, and design. Principles of Conservation Biology 2006, 507-549. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, U.S. 3rd ed. M.J. Groom, G.K. Meffe, C. Ronald Carroll (Eds.).
38. Rodrigues A.S.L., Gaston K.J. Optimisation in reserve selection procedures - why not?. Biological Conservation 2002, 107:123-129.
39. Sabbadin R., Spring D., Rabier C.E. Dynamic reserve site selection under contagion risk of deforestation. Ecological Modeling 2007, 201:75-81.
40. Snyder S., Haight R.G., ReVelle C.S. A scenario optimization model for dynamic reserve site selection. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2004, 9:179-187.
41. Strange N., Thorsen B.J., Bladt J. Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic world. Biological Conservation 2006, 131:33-41.
42. Tajibaeva L., Haight R.G., Polasky S. A discrete-space urban model with environmental amenities. Resource and Energy Economics 2008, 30(2):170-196.
43. Toregas C., ReVelle C. Binary logic solutions to a class of location problems. Geographical Analysis 1973, 5:145-155.
44. Underhill L.G. Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biological Conservation 1994, 70:85-87.
45. Williams J.C. A zero-one programming model for contiguous land acquisition. Geographical Analysis 2002, 34:330-349.
46. Williams J.C., ReVelle C.S. A 0-1 programming approach to delineating protected reserves. Environment and Planning B 1996, 23:607-622.
47. Williams J.C., ReVelle C.S. Reserve assemblage of critical areas: a zero-one programming approach. European Journal of Operational Research 1998, 104:497-509.
48. Williams J.C., ReVelle C.S., Levin S.A. Spatial attributes and reserve design models: a review. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2005, 10(3):163-181.
49. Wu J. Environmental amenities and the spatial pattern of urban sprawl. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83:691-697.
50. Wu J., Irwin E.G. Optimal land development with endogenous environmental amenities. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008, 90:232-248.
51. Wu J., Adams R.M., Plantinga A.J. Amenities in an urban equilibrium model: residential development in Portland, Oregon. Land Economics 2004, 80(1):19-32.