Evaluation of castor oil-based polyurethane membranes in rat bone-marrow cell culture;Avaliação de membranas à base de óleo de polímero de mamona em culturas de células de medula óssea de ratos

Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 333-338

  de Amorim Cerejo, Sofia ^a   Rahal, Sheila Canevese ^a   de Lima Neto, João Ferreira ^a   Voorwald, Fabiana Azevedo ^a   da Cruz Landim e Alvarenga, Fernanda ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Castor Oil; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Rats

Indexed keywords

CASTOR OIL; POLYURETHAN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW BIOPSY; BONE MARROW CULTURE; CELL ISOLATION; CELL VIABILITY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY GRADIENT; FEMUR; FLOW CYTOMETRY; MALE; NONHUMAN; RAT; TIBIA;

ANIMALS; CASTOR OIL; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SEPARATION; CELL SURVIVAL; FLOW CYTOMETRY; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; POLYURETHANES; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 80053314291     PISSN: 01028650     EISSN: 16782674     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-86502011000500002     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fibbe WE. Mesenchymal stem cells. A potential source for skeletal repair. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61 Suppl 2:ii29-31.
2. Barry FP, Murphy JM. Mesenchymal stem cells: clinical applications and biological characterization. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:568-84.
3. Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells: cell-based reconstructive therapy in orthopedics. Tissue Eng. 2005;11(7/8):1198-1209.
4. Conrad C, Huss R. Adult stem cell lines in regenerative medicine and reconstructive surgery. J Surg Res. 2005;124(2):201-8.
5. Stock UA, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering: current state and prospects. Ann Rev Med. 2001;52:443-51.
6. Beloti MM, Hiraki KR, Barros VM, Rosa AL. Effect of the chemical composition of Ricinus communis polyurethane on rat bone marrow cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;64(1):171-6.
7. Bioosteo. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.biomecanica.com.br Acessado em: 10 jul 2010.
8. Ohara GH, Kojima KE, Rossi JC, Telles M, Soares TVC, Salomão C, Sanda M. Estudo experimental da biocompatibilidade do polímero poliuretano da mamona implantada intra-óssea e intraarticular em coelhos. Acta Ortop Bras. 1995;3(2):62-8.
9. Ignácio H, Mazzer N, Barbieri CH, Chierice GO. Use of compact and porous castor oil polyurethane in the filling of bone defects. Experimental study in dogs. Rev Bras Ortop. 2002;37(5):187-94.
10. Barros VM, Rosa AL, Beloti MM, Chieriche G. In vivo biocompatibility of three different chemical compositions of Ricinus communis polyurethane. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67(1):235-9.
11. Pereira-Junior OCM, Rahal SC, Felisbino SL, Iamaguti P, Pavan PT, Vulcano LC. Comparison between polyurethanes containing castor oil (soft segment) and cancellous bone autograft in the treatment of segmental bone defect induced in rabbits. J Biomater Appl. 2007;(21):283-97.
12. Pereira-Junior OCM. Biomateriais como arcabouço para sustentação de células-tronco mesenquimais (Tese de Doutorado). Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu; 2009.
13. Böyum A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1968;97:77-89.
14. Costa PCS, Muccillo FB. Obtenção de células mononucleares de medula óssea (CMMO). Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia de Laranjeiras (INCL), 2005. Disponível em: http://www.terapiacelular. hcl.gov.br. Acesso em: 28 jul 2010.
15. Bruder SP, Fox BS. Tissue engineering of bone. Cell based strategies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;(367 Suppl):S68-83.
16. Zellin G, Linde A. Treatment of segmental defects in long bone using osteopromotive membranes and recombinant human bon morphogenetic protein-2. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1997;31:97-104.
17. Takata T, Wang HL, Miyauchi M. Migration of osteoblastic cells on various guided bone regeneration membranes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:332-8.
18. Dongieux JW, Block MS, Morris G, Gardiner D, Dean K. The effect of different membranes on onlay bone graft success in the dog mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;86(2):145-51.
19. Claro Neto S. Caracterizações físicoquímica de um poliuretano derivado de óleo de mamona utilizado para implantes ósseos (Tese de Doutorado). São Carlos: Instituto de Química de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo; 1997.
20. Kose GT, Ber S, Korkusuz F, Hasirci V. Poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid) based tissue engineering matrices. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003;14(2):121-6.