Evidence that BAC treatment enhances the DOC Removal by enhanced coagulation

Desalination

Volumn 280, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 326-331

  Aryal, Ashok ^a   Sathasivan, Arumugam ^a   Adhikari, Rekha A ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

BAC; DOC removal; Enhanced coagulation; Pre treatment

Indexed keywords

BAC; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVATED CARBON; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES; DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON; EFFLUENT ORGANIC MATTER; EMPTY BED CONTACT TIME; ENHANCED COAGULATION; PRE-TREATMENT; WASTEWATER EFFLUENTS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

ACTIVATED CARBON; ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT; COAGULATION; EFFLUENT TREATMENT; EFFLUENTS; ORGANIC CARBON; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

COAGULATION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON; EFFLUENT; MODELING; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER;

EID: 80053302621     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Shon H.K., Vigneswaran S., Aim R.B., Ngo H.H., Kim I.S., Cho J. Influence of flocculation and adsorption as pretreatment on the fouling of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes: application with biologically treated sewage effluent. Environment Science and Technology 2005, 39:3864-3871.
2. Jarusutthirak C., Amy G., Croue J.P. Fouling characteristics of wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) isolates on NF and UF membranes. Desalination 2002, 145:247-255.
3. Liang L., Singer P.C. Factors influencing the formation and relative distribution of haloacetic acids and trihalomethanes in drinking water. Environment Science and Technology 2003, 37:2920-2928.
4. Croue J.P., Violleau D., Bodaire C., Legube B. Removal of hydrophobic and hydrophilic constituents by anion exchange resin. Water Science and Technology 1999, 40(9):207-214.
5. White M.C., Thompson J.D., Harrington G.W., Singer P.C. Evaluating criteria for enhanced coagulation compliance. Journal of American Water Works Association 1997, 89:64-77.
6. Collins M.R., Amy G.L., Steelink C. Molecular weight distribution, carboxylic acidity, and humic substances content of aquatic organic matter: implications for removal during water treatment. Environment Science and Technology 1986, 20:1028-1032.
7. Matilainen A., Lindqvist N., Korhonen S., Tuhkanen T. Removal of NOM in the different stages of the water treatment process. Environmental International 2002, 26:457.
8. Edzwald J.K., Becker W.C., Wattier K.L. Surrogate parameters for monitoring organic matter and THM precursors. Journal of American Water Works Association 1985, 77:122-132.
9. Owen D.M., Chowdhury Z.K., Rajendra P., George M., Kathy V. NOM characterization and treatability. Journal of American Water Works Association 1995, 87:46-63.
10. Kastl G., Sathasivan A., Fisher I., van Leeuwen J. Modelling DOC removal by enhanced coagulation. Journal of American Water Works Association 2004, 96:79-89.
11. Dussert B.W., Stone G.R.V. The biological activated carbon process for water purification. Water Engineering and Management 1994, Access Date, 4 November, 2010. http://www.wwdmag.com/The-Biological-Activated-Carbon-Process-for-Water-Purification-article180.
12. Xiaojian Z., Shansheng W., Xiasheng G. Simple combination of biodegradation and carbon adsorption - the mechanism of the biological activated carbon process. Water Research 1991, 25:165-172.
13. Scholz M., Martin R.J. Ecological equilibrium of biological activated carbon. Water Research 1997, 31:2959-2968.
14. Weber W.J., Ying W.C. Integrated biological and physicochemical treatment for reclamation of wastewater. Proceedings of the International Association of Water Pollution Research 1977, Johannesburg, South Africa.
15. Rice R.G., Robson C.M. Biological Activated Carbon 1982, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Mich.
16. Kelven C.M., Collins M.R., Negm R., Farrar M.F. Characterization of NOM Removal by Biologically Activated Carbon in Advances in Slow Sand Filtration 1996, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, England, 1471-96740-8. N. Graham, R. Collins (Eds.).
17. Asami M., Oya M., Kosaka K. A nationwide Survey of NDMA in Raw and Drinking Water in Japan. Science of the Total Environment 2009, 407:3540-3545.
18. Kim J., Kang B. DBPs removal in GAC filter-adsorber. Water Research 2008, 42:145-152.
19. Servais P., Billen G., Bouillot P. Biological colonization of granular activated carbon filters in drinking-water treatment. Environment Engineering 1994, 120:888-899.
20. Hoang T.T.L., Vigneswaran S., Ngo H.H., Kandasamy J., Shim W.G. D.S, Chaudhary, P. Gotety and P. Peiris, Performance of evaluation of mathematical modelling of granular activated carbon biofiltration in wastewater treatment. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 2008, 25:259.
21. A. Aryal, and A. Sathasivan, Effect of suspended solids in secondary wastewater effluent on DOC removal by enhanced coagulation (in press).
22. Carlson K.H., Amy G.L. The importance of soluble microbial products (SMPS) in biological drinking water treatment. Water Research 2000, 34:1386-1396.
23. Namakung E., Rittman B.E. Soluble microbial products (SMP) formation kinetics by biofilms. Water Research 1986, 10:795-806.
24. Randtke S.J. Organic contaminant removal by coagulation and related process combinations. Journal of American Water Works Association 1998, 80:40-56.
25. Aryal A., Sathasivan A. Synergistic effect of biological activated carbon and enhanced coagulation in secondary wastewater effluent treatment. Accepted with minor revision for Water Science and Technology 2011.