Facilitating Ethical Reflection Among Scientists Using the Ethical Matrix

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 425-445

  Jensen, Karsten Klint ^a   Forsberg, Ellen Marie ^b   Gamborg, Christian ^a   Millar, Kate ^c   Sandøe, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b WORK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Animal disease genomics; Ethical matrix; Ethical reflection; Ethics; Participatory methods; Stakeholder engagement

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BIOETHICS; DEMOGRAPHY; ETHICS; GENOMICS; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; RESEARCH ETHICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY;

ANIMALS; ATTITUDE; BIOETHICAL ISSUES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GENOMICS; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIAL VALUES; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 80053294975     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 16605454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-010-9218-2     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. England, G., & Millar, K. (2008). The ethics and role of AI with fresh and frozen semen in dogs. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 43(2), 165-171.
2. Forsberg, E.-M. (2007a). A deliberative ethical matrix method-Justification of moral advice on genetic engineering in food production. Dr. Art. Dissertation. Oslo, Unipub.
3. Forsberg, E.-M. (2007b). Report from a value workshop on GM Rapeseed. In W. Zollitsch, C. Winkler, S. Waiblinger, & A. Haslberger (Eds.), Sustainable food production and ethics (pp. 442-449). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
4. Kaiser, M. (2005). Assessing ethics and animal welfare in animal biotechnology for farm production. OiE review. Revue Scientifique Et Technique Office International Des Epizooties, 24, 75-87.
5. Lassen, J., Madsen, K. H., & Sandoe, P. (2002). Ethics and genetic engineering-lessons to be learned from GM foods. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 24(5), 263-271.
6. Mepham, B., Kaiser, M., Thorstensen, E., Tomkins, S., & Millar, K. (2006). Ethical matrix manual. The Hague: LEI.
7. Meyer, G., Gamborg, C., & Sandøe, P. (2005a). A study of ethical and societal issues. Copenhagen: Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment.
8. Meyer, G., Gamborg, C., & Sandøe, P. (2005b). Ethical deliberation: Principles. Copenhagen: Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk Assessment.
9. Millar, K., & Mepham, B. (2001). Bioethical analysis of biotechnologies: Lessons from automatic milking systems (AMS) and bovine somatotrophin (bST). In C. M. Wathes, A. R. Frost, F. Gordon, & J. D. Wood (Eds.), Occasional publication number 28 (pp. 29-36). Edinburgh: British Society of Animal Science.
10. Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.
11. Star, L., Ellen, E. D., Uitdehaag, K., & Brom, F. W. A. (2008). A plea to implement robustness into a breeding goal: Poultry as an example. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21, 109-125.
12. Wynne, B. (1996). May the sheep safely graze? In S. M. Lash, M. B. Szerszynski, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity (pp. 44-83). London: Sage.