Non-projective parsing for statistical machine translation

EMNLP 2009 - Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: A Meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of ACL, Held in Conjunction with ACL-IJCNLP 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 200-209

  Carreras, Xavier ^a   Collins, Michael ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GRAMMARS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION;

BLEU SCORES; DEPENDENCY PARSING; DISCRIMINATIVE MODELS; HUMAN EVALUATION; RICH FEATURES; STATISTICAL MACHINE TRANSLATION; TREE ADJOINING GRAMMARS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053294160     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1699510.1699537     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. H. Alshawi. 1996. Head automata and bilingual tiling: Translation with minimal representations. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 167-176.
2. X. Carreras, M. Collins, and T. Koo. 2008. TAG, dynamic programming and the perceptron for efficient, feature-rich parsing. In Proc. of CoNLL.
3. E. Charniak, K. Knight, and K. Yamada. 2003. Syntax-based language models for machine translation. In Proceedings of MT Summit IX.
4. E. Charniak. 2001. Immediate-head parsing for language models. In Proceedings of ACL 2001.
5. C. Cherry. 2008. Cohesive phrase-based decoding for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 72-80, Columbus, Ohio, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. D. Chiang. 2005. A hierarchical phrase-based model for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL.
7. M. Collins, P. Koehn, and I. Kucerova. 2005. Clause restructuring for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL.
8. M. Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 16-23, Madrid, Spain, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. J. Eisner. 2000. Bilexical grammars and their cubictime parsing algorithms. In H. C. Bunt and A. Nijholt, editors, New Developments in Natural Language Parsing, pages 29-62. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. J. Eisner. 2003. Learning non-isomorphic tree mappings for machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL.
11. A.K. Joshi and Y. Schabes. 1997. Tree-adjoining grammars. In G. Rozenberg and K. Salomaa, editors, Handbook of Formal Languages, volume 3, pages 169-124. Springer.
12. P. Koehn, F.J. Och, and D. Marcu. 2003. Statistical phrase-based translation. In Proceedings of HLT/NAACL.
13. P. Koehn. 2004. Statistical significance tests for machine translation evaluation. In Dekang Lin and Dekai Wu, editors, Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, pages 388-395, Barcelona, Spain, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. P. Koehn. 2005. Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of MT Summit.
15. D.Marcu,W.Wang, A. Echihabi, and K. Knight. 2006. Spmt: Statistical machine translation with syntactified target language phrases. In Proceedings of EMNLP.
16. R. McDonald, K. Crammer, and F. Pereira. 2005. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. In Proceedings of ACL.
17. D. Melamed. 2004. Statistical machine translation by parsing. In Proceedings of ACL.
18. H. Mi, L. Huang, and Q. Liu. 2008. Forest-based translation. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 192-199. Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. R. Nesson, S.M. Shieber, and A. Rush. 2006. Induction of probabilistic synchronous tree-insertion grammars for machine translation. In Proceedings of the 7th AMTA.
20. F.J. Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL.
21. K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W. Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 311-318. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. C. Quirk, A. Menezes, and Colin Cherry. 2005. Dependency tree translation: Syntactically informed phrasal smt. In Proceedings of ACL.
23. O. Rambow, K. Vijay-Shanker, and D. Weir. 1995. D-tree grammars. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 151-158, Cambridge,Massachusetts, USA, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. L. Shen, J. Xu, and R. Weischedel. 2008. A new string-to-dependency machine translation algorithm with a target dependency language model. In Proceedings of ACL.
25. D. Wu. 1997. Stochastic inversion transduction grammars and bilingual parsing of parallel corpora. Computational Linguistics, 23(3):377-404.
26. K. Yamada and K. Knight. 2001. A syntax-based statistical translation model. In Proceedings of ACL.
27. H. Zhang and D. Gildea. 2005. Stochastic lexicalized inversion transduction grammar for alignment. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 473-482.
28. A. Zollmann and A. Venugopal. 2006. Syntax augmented machine translation via chart parsing. In Proceedings of NAACL 2006 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation.