Endogenous Move Structure and Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Theory and Experiment

Journal of Public Economic Theory

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 721-754

  Nosenzo, Daniele ^a   Sefton, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053291070     PISSN: 10973923     EISSN: 14679779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2011.01518.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AI, C., and E. C. NORTON (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models, Economics Letters 80(1), 123-129.
2. ANDREONI, J., P. M. BROWN, and L. VESTERLUND (2002) What makes an allocation fair? Some experimental evidence, Games and Economic Behavior 40(1), 1-24.
3. ARBAK, E., and M. C. VILLEVAL (2007) Endogenous leadership: selection and influence. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2732.
4. CARTWRIGHT, E., and A. PATEL (2010) Imitation and the incentive to contribute early in a sequential public good game, Journal of Public Economic Theory 12(4), 691-708.
5. DAL BÓ, P., A. FOSTER, and L. PUTTERMAN (2010) Institutions and behavior: Experimental evidence on the effects of democracy, American Economic Review 100, 2205-2229.
6. DATTA MAGO, S., and E. DECHENAUX (2009) Price leadership and firm size asymmetry: an experimental analysis, Experimental Economics 12(3), 289-317.
7. DOHMEN, T. J., A. FALK, D. HUFFMAN, U. SUNDE, J. SCHUPP, and G. G. WAGNER (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences, Journal of the European Economic Association 9(3), 522-550.
8. ELLINGSEN, T. (1995) On flexibility in oligopoly, Economics Letters 48(1), 83-89.
9. FEHR, E., and K. M. SCHMIDT (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 817-68.
10. FISCHBACHER, U. (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, Experimental Economics 10(2), 171-178.
11. FONSECA, M., S. HUCK, and H. NORMANN (2005) Playing Cournot although they shouldn't, Economic Theory 25(3), 669-677.
12. FONSECA, M., W. MÜLLER, and H. NORMANN (2006) Endogenous timing in duopoly: Experimental evidence, International Journal of Game Theory 34(3), 443-456.
13. GÄCHTER, S., D. NOSENZO, E. RENNER, and M. SEFTON (2010) Sequential vs. simultaneous contributions to public goods: Experimental evidence, Journal of Public Economics 94(7-8), 515-522.
14. GÄCHTER, S., and E. RENNER (2003) Leading by example in the presence of free rider incentives. Paper presented at the Leadership and Social Interactions Workshop, March 2003, Lyon.
15. GREINER, B. (2004) An online recruitment system for economic experiments, in Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen GWDG Bericht 63, Kurt Kremer and Volker Macho, eds., pp. 79-93. Göttingen Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung.
16. GÜTH, W., M. V. LEVATI, M. SUTTER, and E. VAN DER HEIJDEN (2007) Leading by example with and without exclusion power in voluntary contribution experiments, Journal of Public Economics 91(5-6), 1023-1042.
17. HAMILTON, J. H., and S. M. SLUTSKY (1990) Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or cournot equilibria, Games and Economic Behavior 2(1), 29-46.
18. HUCK, S., W. MÜLLER, and H. NORMANN (2002) To commit or not to commit: Endogenous timing in experimental Duopoly markets, Games and Economic Behavior 38(2), 240-264.
19. MAILATH, G. (1993) Endogenous sequencing of firm decisions, Journal of Economic Theory 59(1), 169-182.
20. MATSUMURA, T. (1999) Quantity-setting oligopoly with endogenous sequencing, International Journal of Industrial Organization 17(2), 289-296.
21. MOIR, R. (1998) A Monte Carlo analysis of the Fisher randomization technique: Reviving randomization for experimental economists, Experimental Economics 1(1), 87-100.
22. NORMANN, H. (2002) Endogenous timing with incomplete information and with observable delay, Games and Economic Behavior 39(2), 282-291.
23. NORTON, E., H. WANG, and C. AI (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models, The Stata Journal 4(2), 154-167.
24. POULSEN, A., and M. ROOS (2010) Do people make strategic commitments? Experimental evidence on strategic information avoidance, Experimental Economics 13(2), 206-225.
25. RIVAS, M. F., and M. SUTTER (2009) Leadership in public goods experiments-On the role of reward, punishment and endogenous leadership. Unpublished manuscript. Available at .
26. ROBSON, A. J. (1990) Duopoly with endogenous strategic timing: Stackelberg regained, International Economic Review 31(2), 263-274.
27. ROMANO, R., and H. YILDIRIM (2001) Why charities announce donations: a positive perspective, Journal of Public Economics 81(3), 423-447.
28. ROMANO, R., and H. YILDIRIM (2005) On the endogeneity of Cournot-Nash and Stackelberg equilibria: games of accumulation, Journal of Economic Theory 120(1), 73-107.
29. SALONER, G. (1987) Cournot duopoly with two production periods, Journal of Economic Theory 42(1), 183-187.
30. SANTOS-PINTO, L. (2008) Making sense of the experimental evidence on endogenous timing in duopoly markets, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 68(3-4), 657-666.
31. SUTTER, M., S. HAIGNER, and M. G. KOCHER (2010) Choosing the carrot or the stick? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations, Review of Economic Studies 77(4), 1540-1566.
32. VAN DAMME, E., and S. HURKENS (1999) Endogenous stackelberg leadership, Games and Economic Behavior 28(1), 105-129.
33. VAN DAMME, E., and S. HURKENS (2004) Endogenous price leadership, Games and Economic Behavior 47(2), 404-420.
34. VARIAN, H. R. (1994) Sequential contributions to public goods, Journal of Public Economics 53(2), 165-186.
35. VESTERLUND, L. (2003) The informational value of sequential fundraising, Journal of Public Economics 87(3-4), 627-657.