Flow cytometric differential cell counts in milk for the evaluation of inflammatory reactions in clinically healthy and subclinically infected bovine mammary glands

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 94, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 5033-5044

  Schwarz, D ^a   Diesterbeck, U S ^a   Konig S ^b   Brugemann K ^b   Schlez, K ^c   Zschock M ^c   Wolter, W ^d   Czerny, C P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

^c Landesbetrieb Hessisches Landeslabor   (Germany)

^d Milk Control   (Germany)

Author keywords

Differential cell count; Low somatic cell count; Subclinical mastitis; Udder health

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BOVINE MASTITIS; CATTLE; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; IMMUNOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MICROBIOLOGY; MILK; PATHOLOGY; UDDER;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; INFLAMMATION; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MAMMARY GLANDS, ANIMAL; MASTITIS, BOVINE; MILK;

BOVINAE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 80053282306     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4348     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Berthon P., Hopkins J. Ruminant cluster CD14. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996, 52:245-248.
2. Burvenich C., Paape M.J., Hill A.W., Guidry A.J., Miller R.H., Heyneman R., Kremer W.D., Brand A. Role of the neutrophil leucocyte in the local and systemic reactions during experimentally induced E. coli mastitis in cows immediately after calving. Vet. Q. 1994, 16:45-50.
3. Davis A.K., Maney D.L., Maerz J.C. The use of leukocyte profiles to measure stress in vertebrates: A review for ecologists. Funct. Ecol. 2008, 22:760-772.
4. Dohoo I.R., Meek A.H. Somatic cell counts in bovine milk. Can. Vet. J. 1982, 23:119-125.
5. Dosogne H., Vangroenweghe F., Mehrzad J., Massart-Leën A.M., Burvenich C. Differential leukocyte count method for bovine low somatic cell count milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2003, 86:828-834.
6. DVG (German Veterinary Society). 2000. Entnahme von Milchproben unter aseptischen Bedingungen. Sachverständigenausschuss "Subklinische Mastitis." DVG, Giessen, Germany.
7. DVG (German Veterinary Society). 2002. Leitlinien zur Bekämpfung der Mastitis als Bestandsproblem. DVG, Giessen, Germany.
8. Harmon R.J. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77:2103-2112.
9. Hill A.W., Shears A.L., Hibbitt K.G. The elimination of serum-resistant Escherichia coli from experimentally infected single mammary glands of healthy cows. Res. Vet. Sci. 1978, 25:89-93.
10. Howard C.J., Naessens J. Summary of workshop findings for cattle (tables 1 and 2). Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1993, 39:25-48.
11. Laboratory methods for use in mastitis work 1981, IDF, International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium, Document 132.
12. Kehrli M.E., Shuster D.E. Factors affecting milk somatic cells and their role in health of the bovine mammary gland. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77:619-627.
13. Koess C., Hamann J. Detection of mastitis in the bovine mammary gland by flow cytometry at early stages. J. Dairy Res. 2008, 75:225-232.
14. Lee C.S., Wooding F.B.P., Kemp P. Identification properties and differential counts of cell populations using electron microscopy of dry cows secretions, colostrum and milk from normal cows. J. Dairy Res. 1980, 47:39-50.
15. Leitner G., Eligulashvily R., Krifucks O., Perl S., Saran A. Immune cell differentiation in mammary gland tissues and milk of cows chronically infected with Staphylococcus aureus. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 2003, 50:45-52.
16. Leitner G., Shoshani E., Krifucks O., Chaffer M., Saran A. Milk leucocyte population patterns in bovine udder infection of different aetiology. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 2000, 47:581-589.
17. Littell R.C., Henry P.R., Ammerman C.B. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76:1216-1231.
18. Loken M.R., Stall A.M. Flow cytometry as an analytical and preparative tool in immunology. J. Immunol. Methods 1982, 50:R85-R112.
19. Medzhitov R. Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature 2007, 449:819-826.
20. Merle R., Schröder A.C., Hamann J. Cell function in the bovine mammary gland: A preliminary study on interdependence of healthy and infected udder quarters. J. Dairy Res. 2007, 74:174-179.
21. Miller R.H., Paape M.J., Fulton L.A. Variation in milk somatic cells of heifers at first calving. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74:3782-3790.
22. Newbould F.H.S., Neave F.K. The recovery of small numbers of Staphylococcus aureus infused into the bovine teat cistern. J. Dairy Res. 1965, 32:157-162.
23. Nickerson S.C. Immunological aspects of mammary involution. J. Dairy Sci. 1989, 72:1665-1678.
24. Östensson K. Total and differential leukocyte counts, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activity, and serum albumin content in foremilk and residual milk during endotoxin-induced mastitis in cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1993, 54:231-238.
25. Östensson K., Hageltorn M., Åström G. Differential cell counting in fraction-collected milk from dairy cows. Acta Vet. Scand. 1988, 29:493-500.
26. Oviedo-Boyso J., Valdez-Alarcón J.J., Cajero-Juárez M., Ochoa-Zarzosa A., López-Meza J.E., Bravo-Patiño A., Baizabal-Aguirre V.M. Innate immune response of bovine mammary gland to pathogenic bacteria responsible for mastitis. J. Infect. 2007, 54:399-409.
27. Paape M.J., Bannerman D.D., Zhao X., Lee J.-W. The bovine neutrophil: Structure and function in blood and milk. Vet. Res. 2003, 34:597-627.
28. Paape M., Mehrzad J., Zhao X., Detilleux J., Burvenich C. Defense of the bovine mammary gland by polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 2002, 7:109-121.
29. Paape M.J., Wergin W.P., Guidry A.J., Pearson R.E. Leukocytes-Second line of defense against invading mastitis pathogens. J. Dairy Sci. 1979, 62:135-153.
30. Piccinini R., Bronzo V., Moroni P., Luzzago C., Zecconi A. Study on the relationship between milk immune factors and Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infections in dairy cows. J. Dairy Res. 1999, 66:501-510.
31. Pillai S.R., Kunze E., Sordillo L.M., Jayarao B.M. Application of differential inflammatory cell count as a tool to monitor udder health. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84:1413-1420.
32. Redelman D., Butler S., Robison J., Garner D. Identification of inflammatory cells in bovine milk by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1988, 9:463-468.
33. Reiter B. Review of progress of dairy science-Anti-microbial systems in milk. J. Dairy Res. 1978, 45:131-147.
34. Reneau J.K. Effective use of dairy herd improvement somatic cell counts in mastitis control. J. Dairy Sci. 1986, 69:1708-1720.
35. Riollet C., Rainard P., Poutrel B. Cell subpopulations and cytokine expression in cow milk in response to chronic Staphylococcus aureus infection. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84:1077-1084.
36. Rivas A.L., Quimby F.W., Blue J., Coksaygan O. Longitudinal evaluation of bovine mammary gland health status by somatic cell counting, flow cytometry, and cytology. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2001, 13:399-407.
37. Rivas A.L., Quimby F.W., Coksaygan O., Alba A., Arina A., Arrobas M.J., González R.N., Mohammed H.O., Lein D.H. Expression of CD3 and CD11b antigens on blood and mammary gland leukocytes and bacterial survival in milk of cows with experimentally induced Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2001, 62:1840-1851.
38. Schröder A.C., Hamann J. The influence of technical factors on differential cell count in milk. J. Dairy Res. 2005, 72:153-158.
39. Schwarz D., Diesterbeck U.S., Failing K., König S., Brügemann K., Zschöck M., Wolter W., Czerny C.-P. Somatic cell counts and bacteriological status in quarter foremilk samples of cows in Hesse, Germany-A longitudinal study. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:5716-5728.
40. Sears P.M., Smith B.S., English P.B., Herer P.S., Gonzalez R.N. Shedding pattern of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine intramammary infections. J. Dairy Sci. 1990, 73:2785-2789.
41. Sopp P., Kwong L.S., Howard C.J. Identification of bovine CD14. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996, 52:323-328.
42. Sordillo L.M., Nickerson S.C. Morphometric changes in the bovine mammary gland during involution and lactogenesis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1988, 49:1112-1120.
43. Sordillo L.M., Shafer-Weaver K., DeRosa D. Immunobiology of the mammary gland. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80:1851-1865.
44. Splitter G., Morrison W.I. Antigens expressed predominantly on monocytes and granulocytes: Identification of bovine CD11b and CD11c. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1991, 27:87-90.
45. Targowski S.P. Role of immune factors in protection of mammary gland. J. Dairy Sci. 1983, 66:1781-1789.
46. Vangroenweghe F., Dosogne H., Mehrzad J., Burvenich C. Effect of milk sampling techniques on milk composition, bacterial contamination, viability and functions of resident cells in milk. Vet. Res. 2001, 32:565-579.
47. Viguier C., Arora S., Gilmartin N., Welbeck K., O'Kennedy R. Mastitis detection: Current trends and future perspectives. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27:486-493.
48. Wever P., Emanuelson U. Effects of systematic influences and intramammary infection on differential and total somatic cell counts in quarter milk samples of dairy cows. Acta Vet. Scand. 1989, 30:465-474.