Development of energy-efficient products: Models, methods and IT support

CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 216-224

  Runger G ^a   Gotze U ^a   Putz, M ^b   Bierer, A ^a   Lorenz, S ^b   Reichel, T ^a   Steger, D ^a   Wenzel, K ^b   Xu, H ^a  

^a CHEMNITZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR MACHINE TOOLS AND FORMING TECHNOLOGY IWU   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ontology; Product development process; Property driven design; Target costing; Workflow

Indexed keywords

DESIGN APPROACHES; DIGITAL PRODUCTS; ENERGY DESIGN; ENERGY-EFFICIENT PRODUCTS; ENTERPRISE APPLICATIONS; IT SYSTEM; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; PRODUCT MODELS; PRODUCT STRUCTURE; SYSTEM ONTOLOGY; TARGET COSTING; WORKFLOW; WORKFLOW MODELING;

DATA VISUALIZATION; DESIGN; ENERGY UTILIZATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; ONTOLOGY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

EID: 80053267131     PISSN: 17555817     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2011.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. T. Gilz, M. Eigner, M. Bitzer, Crossing the innovation chasm with new concepts of DMU in PLM. Bath/UK, 2009.
2. Stark R., Krause F.-L., Kind C., Rothenburg U., Müller P., Hayka H., Stöckert H. Competing in engineering design-the role of virtual product creation. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 2010, 3(3):175-184.
3. Stechert C., Franke H.-J. Managing requirements as the core of multi-disciplinary product development. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 2009, 1(3):153-158.
4. VDI-guideline 2221, Systematic approach to the development and design of technical systems and products, 1993.
5. C. Weber, T. Deubel, New theory-based concepts for PDM and PLM, in: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 03, 2003.
6. Gero J. Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 1990, 4(11):26-36.
7. Colombo G. Towards the design of intelligent CAD systems: an ontological approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2007, 21(2):153-168.
8. Ha S., Suh H. A timed colored petri nets modeling for dynamic workflow in product development process. Computers in Industry 2008, 59(2-3):193-209.
9. T. Reichel, G. Rünger, D. Steger, Flexible workflows for an energy-oriented product development process, in: Business Process and Service Science-Proceedings of ISSS and BPSC. GI, 2010, pp. 243-254.
10. Neugebauer R., Frieß U., Paetzold J., Wabner M., Richter M. Approach for the development of energy-efficient machine tools. Journal of Machine Engineering 2009, 9(2):51-62.
11. Fowler M. Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture 2002, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
12. M. Salatino, jBPM Developer Guide, Packt Publishing, 2010.
13. G. Schuh, Gestaltung und Bewertung von Produktvarianten. Ein Beitrag zur systematischen Planung von Serienprodukten, VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, 1988.
14. H. Schmidt, Konzeption eines Kostenmodells für integrierte Systeme, gezeigt am Beispiel flexibler Fertigungssysteme, Vol. 17 of Forschungsberichte VDI, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, 1989.
15. Ehrlenspiel K., Kiewert A., Lindemann U. Cost-Efficient Design 2007, Springer, Berlin, New York.
16. Sakurai M. Target costing and how to use it. Journal of Cost Management for the manufacturing industry 1989, 3(2):39-50.
17. W. Seidenschwarz, Target Costing: Marktorientiertes Zielkostenmanagement, Franz Vahlen GmbH, München, 1993.
18. Götze U., Weber T., Linke C., Schmidt A. Target Costing für Werkstoffe - Potenziale und Methodik (Target Costing for materials - potentialities and methodology). Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik 2009, 40(7):566-572.
19. D. Janz, M. Hornberger, E. Westkämper, Design for environment by target life cycle costing, in: Innovation in Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Development, Springer, 2006, pp. 337-348.
20. Gruber T. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 1993, 5(2):199-220.
21. N. Noy, D. McGuinness, Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology, Technical report, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory, 2001.
22. Horrocks I. Ontologies and the semantic web. Communications of the ACM - Surviving the data deluge 2008, 51(12):58-67.
23. Harms R., Fleschutz T., Seliger G. Life cycle management of production facilities using semantic web technologies. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 2010, 59(1):45-48.
24. Morbach J., Bayer B., Yang A., Marquardt W. Product data models. Collaborative and Distributed Chemical Engineering. From Understanding to Substantial Design Process Support 2008, Springer, pp. 93-110.
25. Morbach J., Wiesner A., Marquardt W. OntoCAPE-a (re)usable ontology for computer-aided process engineering. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2009, 33(10):1546-1556.
26. Smith B. Against idiosyncrasy in ontology development. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 2006, 150:15-26.
27. Yang A. An ontological conceptualization of multiscale models. Computers & Chemical Engineering 2009, 33(4):822-837.
28. Pahl G., Beitz W., Feldhusen J., Grote K.-H. Engineering Design. A Systematic Approach 2007, Springer, London.
29. T. Deubel, M. Steinbach, C. Weber, Requirement- and cost-driven product development process, in: Engineering Design and the Global Economy: 15th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 05, 2005.
30. Grady J.O. System Requirements Analysis 2006, Elsevier Academic Press.