Rooting depth explains [CO 2]× drought interaction in Eucalyptus saligna

Tree Physiology

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 922-931

  Duursma, Remko A ^a   Barton, Craig V M ^b   Eamus, Derek ^c   Medlyn, Belinda E ^d   Ellsworth, David S ^a   Forster, Michael A ^e   Tissue, David T ^a   Linder, Sune ^f   McMurtrie, Ross E ^g  

^a WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Forest Science Centre   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e ICT International   (Australia)

^f SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^g UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

forest hydrology; global climate change; plant water relations; root allocation; Sydney blue gum

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; WATER;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; DICOTYLEDON; DROUGHT; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH RATE; NUTRIENT UPTAKE; SOIL DEPTH; SOIL WATER; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEHYDRATION; EUCALYPTUS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; PLANT STOMA; SOIL;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; CLIMATE CHANGE; DEHYDRATION; EUCALYPTUS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; SOIL; WATER;

EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS; EUCALYPTUS SALIGNA;

EID: 80053263284     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: 17584469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpr030     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. 2. New Phytol. 165:351-371.
2. 2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant, Cell Environ. 30:258-270. (Pubitemid 46184429)
3. 2-enriched atmospheres. Funct. Plant Biol. 34:1137-1149. (Pubitemid 350174545)
4. 2 enrichment predisposes foliage of a eucalypt to freezing injury and reduces spring growth. Plant, Cell Environ. 28:1506-1515.
5. 2 experimentation and tree scale flux measurements in south-eastern Australia: the Hawkesbury Forest Experiment. Agric. For. Meteorol. 150:941-951.
6. 2 interactions in trees: observations and mechanisms. New Phytol. 134:235-242.
7. Bréda, N., A. Granier, F. Barataud and C. Moyne. 1995. Soil water dynamics in an oak stand. Plant Soil 172:17-27.
8. Calder, I.R., P.T.W. Rosier, K.T. Prasanna and S. Parameswarappa. 1997. Eucalyptus water use greater than rainfall input-possible explanation from southern India. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1:249-256. (Pubitemid 127656787)
9. 2] and drought on cherry (Prunus avium) seedlings. I. Growth, whole-plant water use efficiency and water loss. New Phytol. 141:129-140. (Pubitemid 29092064)
10. Centritto, M., M. Lucas and P. Jarvis. 2002. Gas exchange, biomass, whole-plant water-use efficiency and water uptake of peach (Prunus persica) seedlings in response to elevated carbon dioxide concentration and water availability. Tree Physiol. 22:699.
11. 2 and climate change. J. Exp. Bot. 43:1131-1139.
12. 2 enrichment, phosphorus deficiency and water stress on the growth, conductance and water use of Pinus radiata D. Don. Plant, Cell Environ. 11:91-98.
13. Damesin, C., C. Galera, S. Rambal and R. Joffre. 1996. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on leaf gas exchange and growth of cork-oak (Quercus suber L.) seedlings. Ann. Sci. For. 53:461-467.
14. Dawson, T. 1996. Determining water use by trees and forests from isotopic, energy balance and transpiration analyses: the roles of tree size and hydraulic lift. Tree Physiol. 16:263-272. (Pubitemid 126520751)
15. 2 on fine root length and distribution in an oak-palmetto scrub ecosystem in central Florida. Glob. Change Biol. 2:143-148.
16. 2 enrichment) and N-fertilization. Plant, Cell Environ. 32:1500-1512.
17. Duursma, R.A., P. Kolari, M. Perämäki, et al. 2008. Predicting the decline in daily maximum transpiration rate of two pine stands during drought based on constant minimum leaf water potential and plant hydraulic conductance. Tree Physiol. 28:265-276. (Pubitemid 351373787)
18. Dye, P. 1996. Response of Eucalyptus grandis trees to soil water deficits. Tree Physiol. 16:233-238.
19. 2 and temperatures with water use efficiency. Plant, Cell Environ. 14:843-852.
20. 2 enrichment on water relations in Maranthes corymbosa and Eucalyptus tetrodonta. Austral. J. Bot. 43:273-282.
21. Eamus, D., T.J. Hatton, P.G. Cook and C. Colvin. 2006. Ecohydrology: vegetation function, water and resource management. CSIRO, Melbourne.
22. 2 effects on the water budget of grassland microcosm communities. Glob. Change Biol. 3:197-206. (Pubitemid 127685869)
23. Fisher, R.A., M. Williams, R.L. Do Vale, A.L. Da Costa and P. Meir. 2006. Evidence from Amazonian forests is consistent with isohydric control of leaf water potential. Plant, Cell Environ. 29:151-165.
24. 2: contrasting responses in evergreen and deciduous trees explained by a common principle. Glob. Change Biol. 15:132-144.
25. 2-enriched wheat under waterlimited conditions. Funct. Plant Biol. 6:367-378.
26. 2 and drought. New Phytol. 150:315-335. (Pubitemid 32398595)
27. 2 enrichment. Plant, Cell Environ. 25:379-393. (Pubitemid 34209331)
28. Hungate, B.A., M. Reichstein, P. Dijkstra, D. Johnson, G. Hymus, J.D. Tenhunen, C.R. Hinkle and B.G. Drake. 2002. Evapotranspiration and soil water content in a scrub-oak woodland under carbon dioxide enrichment. Glob. Change Biol. 8:289-298. (Pubitemid 34409578)
29. 2 exchange of a scrub-oak ecosystem. Glob. Change Biol. 9:1802-1812. (Pubitemid 38092876)
30. Isbell, R.F., 1996. The Australian soil classification. CSIRO Publishing, Australia.
31. 2 concentration in forested ecosystems. New Phytol. 186:346-357.
32. 2 enrichment increases carbon and nitrogen input from fine roots in a deciduous forest. New Phytol. 179:837-847.
33. Jackson, R.B., J. Canadell, J.R. Ehleringer, H.A. Mooney, O.E. Sala and E.D. Schulze. 1996. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389-411.
34. 2. Physiol. Plant. 115:93-100. (Pubitemid 34564990)
35. 2 on vegetation. Vegetatio 104/105:64-75.
36. Le Quéré, C., M. Raupach, J. Canadell and G. Marland. 2009. Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nat. Geosci. 2:831-836.
37. 2. Glob. Change Biol. 13:2498-2508. (Pubitemid 350154324)
38. 2 exchange and photosynthesis in a Florida scruboak ecosystem. Photosynthetica 45:51-58. (Pubitemid 46144113)
39. 2 amplified when water is limiting, but reduced when nitrogen is limiting? A growth-optimisation hypothesis. Funct. Plant Biol. 35:521-534.
40. 2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytol. 149:247-264. (Pubitemid 32164119)
41. 2 on the amount and depth distribution of plant water uptake in a California annual grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 12:578-587.
42. 2. Oecologia 140:11-25. (Pubitemid 38893642)
43. 2 under Water Limited Conditions. Vegetatio 104/105:192-209.
44. 2 increases soil moisture and enhances plant water relations in a long-term field study in semi-arid shortgrass steppe of Colorado. Plant Soil 259:169-179. (Pubitemid 38463775)
45. 2. Oecologia 117:201-208. (Pubitemid 29000462)
46. Norby, R. 1994. Issues and perspectives for investigating root responses to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Soil 165:9-20.
47. 2 and global warming in a multi-factor world. New Phytol. 162:281-293. (Pubitemid 38503698)
48. 2 enrichment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101:9689.
49. 2-do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytol. 162:253-280. (Pubitemid 38503697)
50. 2. Glob. Change Biol. 5:497-506. (Pubitemid 29449896)
51. 2 and a soil drying cycle. Ann. For. Sci. 56:71-76. (Pubitemid 29172842)
52. 2 effects on the presumed tradeoff in seedlings of five woody legumes. Tree Physiol. 22:383.
53. Prior, L.D. and D. Eamus. 1999. Seasonal changes in leaf water characteristics of Eucalyptus tetrodonta and Terminalia ferdinandiana saplings in a northern Australian savanna. Austral. J. Bot. 47:587-599. (Pubitemid 29492319)
54. R Development Core Team 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/.
55. Rambal, S. 1984. Water balance and pattern of root water uptake by a Quercus coccifera L. evergreen srub. Oecologia 62:18-25. (Pubitemid 16276943)
56. 2] on growth and photosynthesis of two eucalyptus species exposed to high temperatures and water deficits. Plant Physiol. 111:909.
57. 2, enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere. Environ. Pollut. 83:155-189.
58. Romero-Saltos, H., L. Sternberg, M.Z. Moreira and D.C. Nepstad. 2005. Rainfall exclusion in an eastern amazonian forest alters soil water movement and depth of water uptake. Am. J. Bot. 92:443-455. (Pubitemid 40307585)
59. 2 effects: a species comparison. J. Biogeogr. 22:193-202.
60. Saxe, H., M.G.R. Cannell, B. Johnsen, M.G. Ryan and G. Vourlitis. 2001. Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. New Phytol. 149:369-399.
61. Sinclair, T.R. 2005. Theoretical analysis of soil and plant traits influencing daily plant water flux on drying soils. Agronomy J. 97:1148-1152. (Pubitemid 41129343)
62. 2 enrichment and water stress. Crop Sci. 20:687-690.
63. Sperry, J.S., F.R. Adler, G.S. Campbell and J.P. Comstock. 1998. Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model. Plant, Cell Environ. 21:347-359. (Pubitemid 28286522)
64. 2 enrichment and water stress on growth of Liquidambar styraciflua and Pinus taeda seedlings. Can. J. Bot. 62:2135-2139. (Pubitemid 16272096)
65. Uddling, J., R.M. Teclaw, M.E. Kubiske, K.S. Pregitzer and D.S. Ellsworth. 2008. Sap flux in pure aspen and mixed aspen-birch forests exposed to elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide and ozone. Tree Physiol. 28:1231-1243.
66. 2. Ecohydrology doi:10.1002/eco.173.
67. Williams, M., B.J. Bond and M.G. Ryan. 2001. Evaluating different soil and plant hydraulic constraints on tree function using a model and sap flow data from Ponderosa pine. Plant, Cell Environ. 24:679-690. (Pubitemid 32620790)
68. Wood, S.N. 2006. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Texts in statistical science. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
69. 2 enrichment (FACE). New Phytol. 150:489-498. (Pubitemid 32398610)
70. 2-implications for water-limited environments. Plant, Cell Environ. 25:319-331. (Pubitemid 34179275)
71. 2 and drought on nocturnal water fluxes in Eucalyptus saligna. Tree Physiol. 31:932-944.
72. Zeppel, M., C. Macinnis-Ng, A. Palmer, D. Taylor, R. Whitley, S. Fuentes, I. Yunusa, M. Williams and D. Eamus. 2008. An analysis of the sensitivity of sap flux to soil and plant variables assessed for an Australian woodland using a soil-plant-atmosphere model. Funct. Plant Biol. 35:509-520.