Detecting land-use/land-cover change in rural-urban fringe areas using extended change-vector analysis

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 572-585

  He, Chunyang ^a   Wei, Anni ^a   Shi, Peijun ^a   Zhang, Qiaofeng ^b   Zhao, Yuanyuan ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Change vector analysis; Land use land cover change; Rural urban fringe area; Texture information

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ALOS; DETECTION METHOD; LAND COVER; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; RURAL AREA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPECTRAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; VECTOR;

CHINA;

EID: 80053259916     PISSN: 15698432     EISSN: 1872826X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2011.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arzandeh, S., Wang, J., 2002. Texture evaluation of RADARSAT imagery for wetland mapping. Can. J. Remote Sens. 28 (5), 653-666.
2. Bayarjargal, Y., Karnieli, A., Bayasgalan, M., Khudulmur, S., Gandush, C., Tucker, C.J., 2006. A comparative study of NOAA-AVHRR derived drought indices using change vector analysis. Remote Sens. Environ. 105 (1), 9-22.
3. Bontemps, S., Bogaert, P., Titeux, N., Defourny, P., 2008. An object-based change detection method accounting for temporal dependences in time series with medium to coarse spatial resolution. Remote Sens. Environ. 112 (6), 3181-3191.
4. Bruzzone, L., Prieto, D.F., 2000. Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 38 (3), 1171-1182.
5. Cao, X., Chen, J., Imura, H., Higashi, Q., 2009. A SVM-based method to extract urban areas from DMSP-OLS and SPOT VGT data. Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (10), 2205-2209.
6. Carleer, A.P., Wolff, E., 2006. Urban land cover multi-level region-based classification of VHR data by selecting relevant features. Int. J. Remote Sens. 27 (6), 1035-1051.
7. Carreiras, J.M.B., Pereira, J.M.C., Campagnolo, M.L., Shimabukuro, Y.E., 2006. Assessing the extent of agriculture/pasture and secondary succession forest in the Brazilian Legal Amazon using SPOT VEGETATION data. Remote Sens. Environ. 101 (3), 283-298.
8. Chen, J., Gong, P., He, C., Pu, R., Shi, P., 2003. Land-use/land-cover change detection using improved change-vector analysis. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 69 (4), 369-379.
9. Clarke, K.C., Hoppen, S., Gaydos, L., 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ. Plann. B 24 (2), 247-261.
10. Concheddaa, G., Durieuxb, L., Mayauxa, P., 2008. An object-based method for mapping and change analysis in mangrove ecosystems. ISPRS J. Photogramm. 63 (5), 578-589.
11. Coppin, P., Jonckheere, I., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B., Lambin, E., 2004. Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. Int. J. Remote Sens. 25 (9), 1565-1596.
12. Desclee, B., Bogaert, P., Defourny, P., 2006. Forest change detection by statistical object-based method. Remote Sens. Environ. 102 (1-2), 1-11.
13. Dewan, A.M., Yamaguchi, Y., 2009. Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Appl. Geogr. 29 (3), 390-401.
14. Elvidge, C.D., Yuan, D., Weerackoon, R.D., Lunetta, R.S., 1995. An automated scattergram-controlled regression technique for image normalization. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 61 (10), 1255-1260.
15. Fraser, R.H., Abuelgasim, A., Latifovic, R., 2005. A method for detecting large-scale forest cover change using coarse spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 95 (4), 414-427.
16. Fung, T., LeDrew, E., 1988. The determination of optimal threshold levels for change detection using various accuracy indices. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 54 (10), 1449-1454.
17. Gong, P., Marceau, D.J., Howarth, P.J., 1992. A comparison of spatial feature extraction algorithms for land-use classification with SPOT HRV data. Remote Sens. Environ. 40 (2), 137-151.
18. Hall-Beyer, M., 2007. GLCM texture: a tutorial. Available from: http://www.fp.ucalgary.ca/mhallbey/tutorial.htm (accessed 03.11.09).
19. Haralick, R.M., 1973. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc. IEEE 67 (5), 786-804.
20. Hartter, J., Lucas, C., Gaughan, A.E., Aranda, L.L., 2008. Detecting tropical dry forest succession in a shifting cultivation mosaic of the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Appl. Geogr. 28 (2), 134-149.
21. JAXA [Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency], 2011. About ALOS. Available from: http://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/about/aboutindex.htm (accessed 03.01.11).
22. Jensen, J.R., Toll, D.L., 1982. Detecting residential land-use development at the urban fringe. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 48 (4), 629-643.
23. Johnson, R.D., Kasischke, E.S., 1998. Change-vector analysis: a technique for the multispectral monitoring for land cover and condition. Int. J. Remote Sens. 19 (3), 411-426.
24. Lambin, E., Strahler, A., 1994. Change-vector analysis in multitemporal space: a tool to detect and categorize land-cover change processes using high temporalresolution satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ. 48 (2), 231-244.
25. Liu, Y., Lv, X., Qin, X., Guo, H., Yu, Y., Wang, J., Mao, G., 2007. An integrated GIS-based analysis system for land-use management of lake areas in urban fringe. Landsc. Urban Plann. 82 (4), 233-246.
26. Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondiozio, E., Moran, E., 2004. Change detection techniques. Int. J. Remote Sens. 25 (12), 2365-2407.
27. Lucas, R.M., Honzak, M., Curran, P.J., Foody, G.M., Milne, R., Brown, T., et al., 2000. Mapping the regional extent of tropical forest regeneration stages in the Brazilian Legal Amazon using NOAA AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21 (15), 2855-2881.
28. Malila, W.A., 1980. Change vector analysis: an approach for detecting forest changes with Landsat. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Symposium on Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 3-6 June, pp. 326-335.
29. Mantero, P., Moser, G., Serpico, S.B., 2005. Partially supervised classification of remote sensing images through SVM-based probability density estimation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43 (3), 559-570.
30. Morisette, J.T., Khorram, S., 2000. Accuracy assessment curves for satellite-based change detection. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 66 (7), 875-880.
31. Pacifici, F., Chini, M., Emery, W.J., 2009. A neural network approach using multi-scale textural metrics from very high-resolution panchromatic imagery for urban land-use classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (6), 1276-1292.
32. Shanmugan, K.S., Narayanan, V., Frost, V.S., Stiles, J.A., Holtzman, J.C., 1981. Textural features for radar image analysis. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 19 (3), 153-156.
33. Singh, A., 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely sensed data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 10 (6), 989-1003.
34. Sullivan, W.C., Lovell, S.T., 2006. Agricultural buffers at the rural-urban fringe: an examination of approval by farmers, residents, and academics in the Midwestern United States. Landsc. Urban Plann. 77 (1-2), 152-166.
35. Townshend, J.R.G., Justice, C.O., 1995. Spatial variability of images and the monitoring of changes in the normalized difference vegetation index. Int. J. Remote Sens. 16 (12), 2187-2195.
36. Vapnik, V., 2000. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York.
37. Xian, G., Homer, C., Fry, J., 2009. Updating the 2001 national land cover database land cover classification to 2006 by using Land sat imagery change detection methods. Remote Sens. Environ. 113 (6), 1133-1147.
38. Yuan, F., Sawaya, K.E., Loeffelholz, B.C., Bauer, M.E., 2005. Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan Area by multi-temporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 98 (2-3), 317-328.
39. Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Peng, X., Gong, P., Shi, P., 2002. Urban built-up land change detection with road density and spectral information from multi-temporal Landsat TM data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 23 (15), 3057-3078.
40. Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Gong, P., Shi, P., 2003. Urban spatial pattern analysis from SPOT panchromatic imagery using textural analysis. Int. J. Remote Sens. 24 (21), 4137-4160.