Retrieval of diagnostic and treatment studies for clinical use through PubMed and PubMed's clinical queries filters

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 652-659

  Lokker, Cynthia ^a   Brian Haynes, R ^a   Wilczynski, Nancy L ^a   McKibbon, Ann McKibbon K ^a   Walter, Stephen D ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSICIAN; PUBLICATION; SATISFACTION; SCREENING; SEARCH ENGINE;

CONSUMER SATISFACTION; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNAL MEDICINE; ONTARIO; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PUBMED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80053258319     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000233     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Coumou HCH, Meijman FJ. How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. J Med Libr Assoc 2006;94:55-60.
2. Dawes M, Sampson U. Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. Int J Med Inform 2003;71:9-15.
3. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, et al. Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:217-24.
4. National Institute of Clinical Studies. Information Finding and Assessment Methods that Different Groups of Clinicians Find Most Useful. Melbourne, Australia: National Institute of Clinical Studies, 2003.
5. Magrabi F, Coiera EW, Westbrook JI, et al. General practitioners' use of online evidence during consultations. Int J Med Inform 2005;74:1-12.
6. Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, Gosling AS. Do online information retrieval systems help experienced clinicians answer clinical questions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:315-21.
7. Prendiville TW, Saunders J, Fitzsimons J. The information-seeking behaviour of paediatricians accessing web-based resources. Arch Dis Child 2009;94:633-5.
8. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, et al. Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study. BMJ 2002;324:710-16.
9. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, et al. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 3rd edn. Edinburgh; New York: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone, 2005.
10. Westbrook JI, Gosling AS, Westbrook MT. Use of point-of-care online clinical evidence by junior and senior doctors in New South Wales public hospitals. Int Med J 2005;35:399-404.
11. Hersh WR, Crabtree MK, Hickam DH, et al. Factors associated with success in searching MEDLINE and applying evidence to answer clinical questions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9:283-93.
12. Green ML, Ruff TR. Why do residents fail to answer their clinical questions? A qualitative study of barriers to practicing evidence-based medicine. Acad Med 2005;80:176-82.
13. Green ML. Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-based medicine: a critical review of curricula. Acad Med 1999;74:686-94.
14. Gorman PN, Ash J, Wykoff L. Can primary care physicians' questions be answered using the medical journal literature. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1994;82:140-6.
15. Hoogendam A, Vries Robbe PF, Stalenhoef AF, et al. Evaluation of PubMed filters used for evidence-based searching: validation using relative recall. J Med Libr Assoc 2009;97:186-93.
16. Pluye P, Grad RM, Dunikowski LG, et al. Impact of clinical informationretrieval technology on physicians: a literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies. Int J Med Inform 2005;74:745-68.
17. McKibbon KA, Fridsma DB. Effectiveness of clinician-selected electronic information resources for answering primary care physicians' information needs. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:653-9.
18. Hersh WR, Crabtree MK, Hickam DH, et al. Factors associated with successful answering of clinical questions using an information retrieval system. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2000;88:323-31.
19. Koonce TY, Giuse NB, Todd P. Evidence-based databases versus primary medical literature: an in-house investigation on their optimal use. J Med Libr Assoc 2004;92:407-11.
20. Haynes RB, Wilczynski N. Finding the gold in MEDLINE: clinical queries. ACP J Club 2005;142:A8-9.
21. Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, et al. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ 2005;330:1179.
22. McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. What do evidence-based secondary journals tell us about the publication of clinically important articles in primary healthcare journals? BMC Med 2004;2:33.
23. Wilczynski NL, McKibbon KA, Haynes RB. Enhancing retrieval of best evidence for health care from bibliographic databases: calibration of the hand search of the literature. Stud Health Technol Inform 2001;84:390-3.
24. DiCenso A, Bayley L, Haynes RB. Accessing preappraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. ACP J Club 2009;151:2-3.