Efficacy of using a hydrodebrider and of citric acid/zwitterionic surfactant on a Staphylococcus aureus bacterial biofilm in the sheep model of rhinosinusitis

American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 323-326

  Valentine, Rowan ^a   Jervis Bardy, Josh ^a   Psaltis, Alkis ^a   Tan, Lor Wai ^a   Wormald, Peter John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CITRIC ACID ZWITTERIONIC SURFACTANT; SODIUM CHLORIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY; BIOFILM; CELL DISRUPTION; CELL STRUCTURE; CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DRUG EFFICACY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; EUKARYOTIC FLAGELLUM; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FRONTAL SINUS; HYDRODEBRIDER; INOCULATION; NONHUMAN; REDUCTION; RHINOSINUSITIS; SHEEP; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

ANIMALS; BIOFILMS; CATTLE; CITRIC ACID; DEBRIDEMENT; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; RHINITIS; SHEEP; SINUSITIS; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 80053254467     PISSN: 19458924     EISSN: 19458932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3659     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Potera C. Forging a link between biofilms and disease. Science 283: 1837-1839, 1999. (Pubitemid 29144179)
2. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, and Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318-1322, 1999. (Pubitemid 29289651)
3. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P, et al. Direct detection of bacterial biofilms on the middle- ear mucosa of children with chronic otitis media. JAMA 296:202-211, 2006. (Pubitemid 44050374)
4. Sanderson AR, Leid JG, and Hunsaker D. Bacterial biofilms on the sinus mucosa of human subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 116:1121-1126, 2006. (Pubitemid 44317935)
5. Singhal D, Psaltis AJ, Foreman A, et al. The impact of biofilms on outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy 24: 169-174, 2010.
6. Foreman A, and Wormald PJ. Different biofilms, different disease? A clinical outcomes study. Laryngoscope 120:1701-1706.
7. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, and Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318-1322, 1999. (Pubitemid 29289651)
8. Morris DP, and Hagr A. Biofilm: Why the sudden interest? J Otolaryngol 34(suppl 2):S56-S59, 2005. (Pubitemid 44861993)
9. Desrosiers M, Myntti M, and James G. Methods for removing bacterial biofilms: In vitro study using clinical chronic rhinosinusitis specimens. Am J Rhinol 21:527-532, 2007. (Pubitemid 350099759)
10. Ha KR, Psaltis AJ, Tan L, et al. A sheep model for the study of biofilms in rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol 21:339-345, 2007. (Pubitemid 46985146)
11. Ha KR, Psaltis AJ, Butcher AR, et al. In vitro activity of mupirocin on clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and its potential implications in chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 118:535-540, 2008. (Pubitemid 351640625)
12. Tamashiro E, Antunes MB, Palmer JN, et al. Implications of bacterial biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis. Braz J Infect Dis 13:232-235, 2009.
13. Schipor I, Palmer JN, Cohen AS, et al. Quantification of ciliary beat frequency in sinonasal epithelial cells using differential interference contrast microscopy and high-speed digital video imaging. Am J Rhinol 20:124-127, 2006.
14. Anglen JO, Apostoles S, Christensen G, et al. The efficacy of various irrigation solutions in removing slime-producing Staphylococcus. J Orthop Trauma 8:390-396, 1994.
15. Le T, Psaltis A, Tan LW, et al. The efficacy of topical antibiofilm agents in a sheep model of rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol 22:560-567, 2008.