Multi-prototype vector-space models of word meaning

NAACL HLT 2010 - Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 109-117

  Reisinger, Joseph ^a   Mooney, Raymond J ^a  

^a University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT DEPENDENT; EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON; ISOLATED WORDS; LEXICAL AMBIGUITY; LEXICAL SEMANTICS; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; SINGLE VECTORS; VECTOR REPRESENTATIONS; VECTOR-SPACE MODELS; WORD MEANING;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL;

EID: 80053248772     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Eneko Agirre and Phillip Edmond. 2006. Word Sense Disambiguation: Algorithms and Applications (Text, Speech and Language Technology). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA.
2. Eneko Agirre, Enrique Alfonseca, Keith Hall, Jana Kravalova, Marius Paşca, and Aitor Soroa. 2009. A study on similarity and relatedness using distributional and WordNet-based approaches. In Proc. of NAACL-HLT-09, pages 19-27.
3. F. Gregory Ashby and Leola A. Alfonso-Reese. 1995. Categorization as probability density estimation. J. Math. Psychol., 39(2):216-233.
4. L. Douglas Baker and Andrew K. McCallum. 1998. Distributional clustering of words for text classification. In Proceedings of 21st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 96-103.
5. Arindam Banerjee, Inderjit Dhillon, Joydeep Ghosh, and Suvrit Sra. 2005. Clustering on the unit hypersphere using von Mises-Fisher distributions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6:1345-1382.
6. Alexander Budanitsky and Graeme Hirst. 2006. Evaluating wordnet-based measures of lexical semantic relatedness. Computational Linguistics, 32(1):13-47. (Pubitemid 43764024)
7. James R. Curran and Marc Moens. 2002. Improvements in automatic thesaurus extraction. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 workshop on Unsupervised lexical acquisition, pages 59-66.
8. James R. Curran. 2004. From Distributional to Semantic Similarity. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh. College of Science.
9. Scott C. Deerwester, Susan T. Dumais, George W. Furnas, Thomas K. Landauer, and Richard A. Harshman. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41:391-407.
10. Inderjit S. Dhillon and Dharmendra S. Modha. 2001. Concept decompositions for large sparse text data using clustering. Machine Learning, 42:143-175. (Pubitemid 32872402)
11. Katrin Erk, Diana McCarthy, Nicholas Gaylord Investigations on Word Senses, and Word Usages. 2009. Investigations on word senses and word usages. In Proc. of ACL-09.
12. Katrin Erk. 2007. A simple, similarity-based model for selectional preferences. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computer Linguistics.
13. Lev Finkelstein, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Yossi Matias, Ehud Rivlin, Zach Solan, Gadi Wolfman, and Eytan Ruppin. 2001. Placing search in context: the concept revisited. In Proc. of WWW-01, pages 406-414, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
14. Evgeniy Gabrilovich and Shaul Markovitch. 2007. Computing semantic relatedness using Wikipedia-based explicit semantic analysis. In Proc. of IJCAI-07, pages 1606-1611.
15. David Graff. 2003. English Gigaword. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadephia.
16. Tom L. Griffiths, Kevin. R. Canini, Adam N. Sanborn, and Daniel. J. Navarro. 2007. Unifying rational models of categorization via the hierarchical Dirichlet process. In Proc. of CogSci-07.
17. Zellig Harris. 1954. Distributional structure. Word, 10(23):146-162.
18. Lillian Lee. 1999. Measures of distributional similarity. In 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 25-32.
19. Dekang Lin and Patrick Pantel. 2002. Concept discovery from text. In Proc. of COLING-02, pages 1-7.
20. Dekang Lin, Shaojun Zhao, Lijuan Qin, and Ming Zhou. 2003. Identifying synonyms among distributionally similar words. In Proceedings of the Interational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1492-1493. Morgan Kaufmann.
21. Bradley C. Love, Douglas L. Medin, and Todd M. Gureckis. 2004. SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psych. Review, 111(2):309-332. (Pubitemid 38516420)
22. Will Lowe. 2001. Towards a theory of semantic space. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 576-581.
23. Patrick Pantel and Dekang Lin. 2002. Discovering word senses from text. In Proc. of SIGKDD-02, pages 613-619, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
24. Fernando C. N. Pereira, Naftali Tishby, and Lillian Lee. 1993. Distributional clustering of English words. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-93), pages 183-190, Columbus, Ohio.
25. Daniel Ramage, Anna N. Rafferty, and Christopher D. Manning. 2009. Random walks for text semantic similarity. In Proc. of the 2009 Workshop on Graph-based Methods for Natural Language Processing (TextGraphs-4), pages 23-31.
26. Carl E. Rasmussen. 2000. The infinite Gaussian mixture model. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 554-560. MIT Press.
27. Yves Rosseel. 2002. Mixture models of categorization. J. Math. Psychol., 46(2):178-210.
28. Mark Sanderson. 1994. Word sense disambiguation and information retrieval. In Proc. of SIGIR-94, pages 142-151.
29. Hinrich Schütze. 1998. Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(1):97-123.
30. Rion Snow, Brendan O'Connor, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Ng. 2008. Cheap and fast-but is it good? Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proc. of EMNLP-08.
31. Amos Tversky and Itamar Gati. 1982. Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. Psychological Review, 89(2):123-154.
32. Bram Vandekerckhove, Dominiek Sandra, and Walter Daelemans. 2009. A robust and extensible exemplar-based model of thematic fit. In Proc. of EACL 2009, pages 826-834. Association for Computational Linguistics.