Dendrometric measurements in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. 'Tempranillo' and 'Cabernet sauvignon') under regulated deficit irrigation

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 889, Issue , 2011, Pages 113-122

  Montoro, A ^a   Lopez Urrea R ^a   Manas F ^a   Lopez Fuster P ^a   Fereres, E ^b  

^a Instituto Tecnico Agronomico Provincial de Albacete   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dendrometer; Grapevine; LVDT sensor; Regulated deficit irrigation; Trunk shrinkage

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 80053247062     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.889.11     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Cochard, H., Forestier, S. and Ameglio, T. 2001. A new validation of the Scholander pressure chamber technique based on stem diameter variations. J. Exp. Bot. 52:1361-1365.
2. De la Hera Orts, M.L., Romero, P., Gómez-Plaza, E. and Martinez, A. 2007. Is partial root-zone drying an effective irrigation technique to improve water use efficiency and fruit quality in field-grown wine-grapes under semiarid conditions? Agri. Water Mgt. 87:261-274.
3. Fereres, E. and Goldhamer, D. 2000. Avances Recientes en la Programación de Riegos. Ingeniería del Agua 7:47-54.
4. Fereres, E. and Goldhamer, D. 2003. Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 78(2):139-144.
5. Fulton, A., Salinas, M., Montoro, A. and Goldhamer, D. 2004. Evaluation of trunk or scaffold shrinkage in walnut as an indicator of orchard water status. California Walnut Marketing Board Annual Report.
6. Garnier, E. and Berger, A. 1986. Effect of water stress on stem diameter changes of peach trees growing in the field. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:193-209.
7. Girona, J., Mata, M., Del Campo, J., Arbonés, A., Bartra, E. and Marsal, J. 2006. The use of midday leaf water potential for scheduling deficit irrigation in vineyards. Irrig. Sci. 24:115-127.
8. Goffinet, M.C. 1977. Anatomy of a murder-where cold kills. Proc. Wash State Grape Soc. 26:3-25.
9. Goldhamer, D. and Fereres, E. 2001. Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements. Irrig. Sci. 20:115-125.
10. Hinckley, T.M. and Bruckerhoff, D.N. 1975. The effects of drought on water relations and stem shrinkage of Quercus alba. Can. J. Bot. 53:62-72.
11. Huck, M.G. and Klepper, B. 1976. Water relation of cotton II. Continuos estimates of plant water potential from stem diameter measurements. Agron. J. 69:593-597.
12. Huguet, J., Li, S., Lorendeau, J. and Pelloux, G. 1992. Specific micromorphometric reactions of fruit trees to water strees and irrigation scheduling automation. J. Hort. Sci. 67(5):631-640.
13. Intrigliolo, D.S. and Castel, J.R. 2004. Continuos measurement of plant and soil water status for irrigation scheduling in plum. Irrig. Sci. 23:93-102.
14. Intrigliolo, D.S. and Castel, J.R. 2007. Evaluation of grapevine water status from trunk diameter variations. Irrig. Sci. 26:49-59.
15. Intrigliolo, D.S. and Castel, J.R. 2008. Effects of irrigation on the performance of grapevine cv. Tempranillo in Requena, Spain. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 59:30-38.
16. Intrigliolo, D.S., Castel, J.R. and Pérez, D. 2005. Water relations of field grown drip irrigated 'Tempranillo' grapevines. Acta Hort. 689:317-324.
17. Klepper, B., Browing, V.D. and Taylor, H.M. 1971. Trunk diameter in relation to plant water status. Plant Physiol. 48:683-685.
18. Li, S., Huguet, J., Schoch, P. and Bussi, C. 1990. Réponse de jeunes pêchers cultivés en pots à différents régimes d'alimentation hydrique. I. Conséquences sur la transpiration, la résistance stomatique, le potentiel hydrique foliaire, la photosynthésé et les variations micromorphométriques des tiges. Agronomie 10:353-360.
19. Marsal, J., Gelly, M., Mata, M., Arbonés, J., Rufat, J. and Girona, J. 2002. Phenology and drought affects the relationship between daily trunk shrinkage and midday stem water potential of peach trees. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 77:411-417.
20. Montoro, A., López-Urrea, R., Mañas, F., López Fuster, P. and Fereres, E. 2008. Evapotranspiration of Wine Grapes from a Weighing Lysimeter in La Mancha, Spain. Acta Hort. 792:459-466.
21. Montoro, A., Mañas, F., López Urrea, R., Martínez Ruíz, D., López Fuster, P. and Fereres, E. 2005. Evapotranspiración de Vitis vinifera cv. Cencibel y relaciones hídricas en cv. Cencibel, Macabeo y Cabernet Sauvignon bajo riego deficitario controlado. Proc. XXIII Congreso Nacional de Riegos. Elche, Spain 14-16 Jun. p.25- 26.
22. Moriana, A. and Fereres, E. 2002. Plant indicators for scheduling irrigation of young olive trees. Irrig. Sci. 21:83-90.
23. Myburg, P.A. 1996. Respose of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Barlinka/Ramsey to soil water depletion levels with particular references to trunk growth parameters. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 17:3-14.
24. Pagán, E., Pérez Pastor, A., Nortes, P.A., Egea, G. and Domingo, R. 2007. Programación del riego deficitario en almendro con dendrómetros. Optimización del uso del agua. Proc. XXV Congreso Nacional de Riegos. Pamplona, Spain. 15-17 May. p.83-84.
25. Papadakis, J. 1966. Climates of the world and their agricultural potentialities. Papadakis, Buenos Aires.
26. Salón, J.L., Chirivella, C. and Castel, J.R. 2005. Response of Vitis vinifera cv. Bobal to the timing of deficit irrigation in Requena, Spain. Water relations, yield and wine quality. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 56:1-8.
27. Sellés, G., Ferreira, R., Muñoz, I. and Silva, H. 2004. Physiological indicators of plant water status as criteria for irrigation scheduling in tables grapes cv. Crimsom seedless, irrigated by drip. Acta Hort. 278:87-100.
28. Selles, G., Ferreyra, R., Ahumada, R., Muñoz, I. and Silva, H. 2008. effect of soil water content and berry phenological stages on trunk diameter variations in table grapes. Acta Hort. 792:573-580.
29. SPSS Inc. 2000. SPSS 10.0 Applications Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
30. Tyree, M.T. and Jarvis, P.G. 1982. Water relations and carbon assimilation. p.35-78. In: O.L. Lange, P.S. Nobel, C.B. Osmond and H. Ziegler (eds.), Physiological plant ecology II, Springer, Berlin.
31. Valdés M.E., Martín, D., Alvarez, M.L., Uriarte, D. and Prieto, M.H. 2003. "Influencia del estado hídrico pre y postenvero en el potencial fenólico de bayas del cv. Tempranillo en Extremadura". Proc. VII Jornadas Científicas de los Grupos de Investigación Enológica. Gienol. Logroño, Spain. 21-23 May.
32. Van Zyl, J.L. 1984. Response of Colombar grapevines to irrigation as regards quality aspects and growth. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 5:19-28.
33. Weyand, K.M. and Schultz, H.R. 2006. Long-term dynamics of nitrogen and carbohydrate reserves in woody parts of minimally and severly pruned Riesling vines in a cool climate. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 57:172-182.
34. Williams, L.E. and Ayars, J.E. 2005. Grapevine water use and the crop coefficient are linear functions of the shaded area measured beneath the canopy. Agric. Forest Meteorology 132:201-211.
35. Williams, L.E., Phene, C.J., Grimes, D.W. and Trout, T.J. 2003. Water use of mature Tompson Seedless grapevines in California. Irrig. Sci. 22:11-18.
36. Yuste, J., Asenjo, J.L., Alburquerque, M.V. and Rubio, J.A. 2004. Relationships among physiology, growth and production as affected by water regime and vine spacing of Tempranillo grapevines. Acta Hort. 689:343-348.