Multi-objective path placement optimization of parallel kinematics machines based on energy consumption, shaking forces and maximum actuator torques: Application to the Orthoglide

Mechanism and Machine Theory

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1125-1141

  Ur Rehman, Raza ^a   Caro, Stephane ^a   Chablat, Damien ^a   Wenger, Philippe ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE EN COMMUNICATIONS ET CYBERNÉTIQUE DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Multi objective optimization; Parallel kinematics machine; Path planning

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ENERGY UTILIZATION; ERROR COMPENSATION; KINEMATICS; MOTION PLANNING;

ACTUATOR TORQUES; ELECTRIC ENERGIES; GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINT; MULTI OBJECTIVE; OPTIMAL LOCATIONS; PARALLEL KINEMATICS MACHINES; PLACEMENT OPTIMIZATION; THREE DEGREE OF FREEDOMS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 80053244427     PISSN: 0094114X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. A.A. Ata, Optimal trajectory planning of manipulators: a review, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2 (1) (2007) 32-54.
2. L. Tian, C. Collins, "Motion planning for redundant manipulators using a floating point genetic algorithm", Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, Theory and Applications 38 (3-4) (2003) 297-312.
3. K.K. Chan, A.M.S. Zalzala, Genetic-based minimum time trajectory planning of articulated manipulators with torque constraints, IEEE Colloquium on Genetic Algorithms for Control Systems Engineering, London, 1993, pp. 4/1-4/3.
4. V. Pateloup, E. Duc, P. Ray, Corner optimization for pocket machining, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 44(12-13) (2004) 1343-1353.
5. G. Field, Iterative dynamic programming, an approach to minimum energy trajectory planning for robotic manipulators, Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, vol. 3, 1995, pp. 2755-2760.
6. A. Hirakawa, A. Kawamura, Trajectory planning of redundant manipulators for minimum energy consumption without matrix inversion, Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, New Mexico, 1997, pp. 2415-2420.
7. B. Nelson, M. Donath, Optimizing the location of assembly tasks in a manipulator's workspace, Journal of Robotic System 7 (6) (1990) 791-811.
8. N.A. Aspragathos, Optimal location of path following tasks in the workspace of a manipulator using genetic algorithm, ARK'96, Published in Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Portroz, Slovinia, 1996, pp. 179-188.
9. N.A. Aspragathos, S. Foussias, Optimal location of a robot path when considering velocity performance, Robotica 20 (2002) 139-147.
10. B. Fardanesh, J. Rastegar, Minimum cycle time location of a task in the workspace of a robot arm, Proc. of the 27th Conf. on Decision Control, Austin, Texas, 1988, pp. 2280-2283.
11. J.T. Feddema, Kinematically optimal robot placement for minimum time coordinated motion, Proc. of the IEEE 13th Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Part 4, 1996, pp. 22-28.
12. J.S. Hemmerle, F.B. Prinz, Optimal path placement for kinematically redundant manipulators, Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation 2 (1991) 1234-1244.
13. G.J.A. Pamanes, S. Zeghloul, Optimal placement of robotic manipulators using multiple kinematic criteria, Proc. of the 1991 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation 1 (1991) 933-938.
14. G.J.A. Pamanes, S. Zeghloul, J. Lallemand, On the optimal placement and task compatibility of manipulators, Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Advanced Robotics-'91 ICAR, vol. 2, 1991, pp. 1694-1697.
15. G.J.A. Pamanes, E. Cuan-Duron, S. Zeghloul, Single and multiobjective optimization of path placement for redundant robotic manipulators, Ingeniería Investigación y Tecnología 9(3) (2008) 211-237.
16. Z. Wang, C. Wang, W. Liu, Y. Lei, A study on workspace, boundary workspace analysis and workpiece positioning for parallel machine tools, Mechanism and Machine Theory 36 (5) (2001) 605-622.
17. R. Ur-Rehman, S. Caro, D. Chablat, P. Wenger, Path placement optimization of manipulators based on energy consumption: application to the Orthoglide 3-axis, Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering 33 (3) (2009) 523-541.
18. G. Lacroux, Les actionneurs électriques pour la robotique et les asservissements, Technique et Documentation Lavoisier2nd edition, 1994 Paris.
19. S.T. Chiou, G.J. Bai, W.K. Chang, Optimum balancing design of the drag-link drive of mechanical presses for precision cutting, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 38(3) (1998) 131-141.
20. Y. Wu, C.M. Gosselin, Synthesis of reactionless spatial 3-dof and 6-dof mechanisms without separate counter-rotations, The International Journal of Robotics Research 23 (6) (2004) 625-642.
21. B. Moore, J. Schicho, C. Gosselin, Determination of the complete set of shaking force and shaking moment balanced planar four-bar linkages, Mechanism and Machine Theory 44 (7) (2009) 1338-1347.
22. R. Clavel, Delta, a fast robot with parallel geometry, Proc. of 18th Int. Symposium on Industrial Robots, April 1988, pp. 91-100.
23. P. Wenger, D. Chablat, Kinematic analysis of a new parallel machine tool: the Orthoglide, in: J. Lenarcic, M.M. Stanisic (Eds.), Advances in Robot Kinematic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, pp. 305-314.
24. A. Pashkevich, D. Chablat, P. Wenger, Stiffness analysis of overconstrained parallel manipulators, Mechanism and Machine Theory 44(5) (May 2009) 966-982.
25. D. Chablat, P. Wenger, Architecture Optimization, of a 3-DOF Parallel Mechanism for Machining Applications, The Orthoglide, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 19 (2003) 403-410.
26. S. Guégan, W. Khalil, Ph. Lemoine, Identification of the Dynamic Parameters of the Orthoglide, IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, vol. 3, Sept. 14-19 2003, pp. 3272-3277.
27. S. Guegan, W. Khalil, Dynamic modeling of the Orthoglide, Advances in Robot Kinematic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Caldes de Malavella, Spain, 2002, pp. 387-396.
28. F. Majou, C. Gosselin, P. Wenger, D. Chablat, Parametric stiffness analysis of the Orthoglide, Mechanism and Machine Theory 42(3) (March 2007) 296-311.
29. modeFRONTIER, Version 4.0.3, ESTECO, Trieste, Italy, URL http://www.esteco.it.