Time-geographic density estimation for home range analysis

Annals of GIS

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 163-171

  Downs, Joni A ^a   Horner, Mark W ^b   Tucker, Anton D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MOTE MARINE LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Density estimation; Moving objects; Sea turtle; Time geography

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; ESTIMATION METHOD; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GIS; HOME RANGE; PROBABILITY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TURTLE;

ANIMALIA; CARETTA; CARETTA CARETTA; CHELONIIDAE; TESTUDINES;

EID: 80053243536     PISSN: 19475683     EISSN: 19475691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19475683.2011.602023     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bath, S.K., et al., 2006. Characterization of home range using point peeling algorithms. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70 (2), 422-434.
2. Blundell, G.M., et al., 2001. Linear home ranges: effects of smoothing, sample size. and auto correlation on kernel estimates. Ecological Monographs, 71 (3), 469-489
3. Burt, W.H., 1943. Territoriality and home range as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 24, 346-352.
4. Casas, I., Horner, M.W., and Weber, J., 2009. A comparison of three methods for identifying transport-based exclusion: a case study of children's access to urban opportunities in Erie and Niagara counties. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 3 (4), 227-245.
5. Coyne, M.S. and Godley, B.J., 2005. Satellite tracking and analysis tool (STAT): an integrated system for archiving, analyzing and mapping animal tracking data. Marine Ecology Progress Services, 301, 1-7.
6. Demšar, U. and Virrantaus, K., 2010. Space-time density of trajectories: exploring spatio-temporal patterns in movement data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (10), 1527-1542.
7. Downs, J.A., 2010. Time-geographic density estimation for moving point objects. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6292, 16-26.
8. Downs, J.A. and Horner, M.W., 2007. Network-based home range analysis using Delaunay triangulation. In: C.M. Gold, ed. The 4th international symposium on voronoi diagrams in science and engineering, 9-12 July, 2007, University of Glamorgan. Pontypridd, Wales, UK: IEEE, pp. 255-259, doi: 10.1109/ISVD.2007.31.
9. Downs, J.A. and Horner, M.W., 2008. Effects of point pattern shape on home-range estimates. Journal of Wildlife Management, 72 (8), 1813-1818.
10. Downs, J.A. and Horner, M.W., 2009. A characteristic-hull based method for home range estimation. Transactions in GIS, 13, 527-537.
11. Duckham, M., et al., 2008. Efficient generation of simple polygons for characterizing the shape of a set of points in the plane. Pattern Recognition, 41, 3224-3236.
12. Fieberg, J., 2007. Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring. Ecology, 88
13. Getz, W.M. and Wilmers, C.C., 2004. A local nearest-neighbor convex-hull construction of home ranges and utilization distributions. Ecography, 27 (4), 489-505.
14. Girard, C., Tucker, A.D., and Calmettes, B., 2009. Postnesting migrations of loggerhead sea turtles in the Gulf of Mexico: dispersal in highly dynamic conditions. Marine Biology, 156 (9), 1827-1839.
15. Gitzen, R.A., Millspaugh, J.J., and Kernohan, B.J., 2006. Bandwidth selection for fixed-kernel analysis of animal utilization distributions. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 1334-1344.
16. Godley, B.J., et al., 2008. Satellite tracking of sea turtles: Where have we been and where do we go next? Endangered Species Research, 4(1-2), 3-22.
17. Hägerstrand, T., 1970. What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24, 7-21.
18. Hays, G.C., et al., 2001. The implications of location accuracy for the interpretation of satellite-tracking data. Animal Behaviour, 61, 1035-1040.
19. Hemson, G., et al., 2005. Are kernels the mustard? Data from global positioning system (GPS) collars suggests problems for kernel home-range analyses with least-squares cross-validation. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74 (3), 455-463.
20. Horne, J.S., et al., 2007. Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology, 88 (9), 2354-2363
21. Katajisto, J. and Moilanen, A., 2006. Kernel-based home range method for data with irregular sampling intervals. Ecological Modelling, 194 (4), 405-413.
22. Kernohan, B.J., Gitzen, R.A., and Millspaugh, J.J., 2001. Analysis of animal space use and movements. In: J.J. Millspaugh and J.M. Marzluff, eds. Radio tracking animals and populations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 125-166.
23. Kwan, M.P., 2000. Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: a methodological exploration with a large data set. Transportation Research Part C - Emerging Technologies, 8 (1-6), 185-203.
24. Kwan, M.P. and Lee, J., 2003. Geovisualization of human activity patterns using 3D GIS: a time-geographic approach. In: M.F. Goodchild and D.G. Janelle, eds. Spatially integrated social science: examples in best practice, chapter 3. Oxford University Press, pp. 48-56.
25. Laube, P., Imfeld, S., and Weibel, R., 2005. Discovering relative motion patterns in groups of moving point objects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (6), 639-668.
26. Laver, P.N. and Kelly, M.J., 2008. A critical review of home range studies. Journal of Wildlife Management, 72 (1), 290-298.
27. Miller, H.J., 2005a. A measurement theory for time geography. Geographical Analysis, 37 (1), 17-45.
28. Miller, H.J., 2005b. Necessary space-time conditions for human interaction. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 32 (3), 381-401.
29. Miller, H.J. and Bridwell, S.A., 2009. A field-based theory for time geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99 (1), 49-75.
30. Mitchell, M.S. and Powell, R.A., 2008. Estimated home ranges can misrepresent habitat relationships on patchy landscapes. Ecological Modelling, 216 (3-4), 409-414.
31. Mohr, C.O., 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. American Midland Naturalist, 37, 223-249.
32. Neutens, T., et al., 2007a. Human interaction spaces under uncertainty. Transportation Research Record, 2021, 28-35.
33. Neutens, T., et al., 2007b. Space-time opportunities for multiple agents: a constraint-based approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21 (10), 1061-1076.
34. Row, J.R. and Blouin-Demers, G., 2006. Kernels are not accurate estimates of home-range size for herpetofauna. Copeia, 4, 797-802.
35. Silverman, B.W., 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
36. Steury, T.D., et al., 2010. Evaluation of root-n bandwidth selectors for kernel density estimation. Journal of Wildlife Management, 74, 539-548.
37. Trajcevski, G., et al., 2004. Managing uncertainty in moving objects databases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 29 (3), 463-507.
38. Tucker, A.D., 2010. Nest site fidelity and clutch frequency of loggerhead turtles are better elucidated by satellite telemetry than by nocturnal tagging efforts: implications for stock estimation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 383 (1), 48-55.
39. White, G.C. and Garrott, R.A., 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40. Worton, B.J., 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology, 70 (1), 164-168