The everpresent ν-problem: Knowledge of all hidden sectors required

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2011, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Hardeman, Sjoerd ^a   Oberreute, Johannes M ^b   Pal, Gonzalo A ^a,c   Schalm, Koenraad ^a   Van Der Aalst, Ted ^a  

^a UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Chile)

Author keywords

Cosmology of theories beyond the SM; Supergravity models; Supersymmetric effective theories

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053243183     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2011)009     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. E.J. Copeland, A.R. Liddle, D.H. Lyth, E.D. Stewart and D. Wands, False vacuum in ation with Einstein gravity, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6410 [astro-ph/9401011].
2. M. Berg, D. Marsh, L. McAllister and E. Pajer, Sequestering in string compacti cations, arXiv:1012.1858.
3. R. Kallosh, A. Linde and T. Rube, General in aton potentials in supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 043507 [arXiv:1011.5945].
4. D.H. Lyth and A. R. Liddle, The primordial density perturbation: cosmology, in ation and the origin of structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.S.A. (2009), p. 294.
5. A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G.A. Palma and S.P. Patil, Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum, JCAP 01 (2011) 030 [arXiv:1010.3693].
6. M. Gomez-Reino and C.A. Scrucca, Locally stable non-supersymmetric Minkowski vacua in supergravity, JHEP 05 (2006) 015 [hep-th/0602246].
7. E. Cremmer, P. Fayet and L. Girardello, Gravity induced supersymmetry breaking and low-energy mass spectrum, Phys. Lett. B 122 (1983) 41.
8. P. Binetruy and M.K. Gaillard, Temperature corrections, supersymmetric effective potentials and in ation, Nucl. Phys. B 254 (1985) 388.
9. I. Ben-Dayan, R. Brustein and S.P. de Alwis, Models of modular in ation and their phenomenological consequences, JCAP 07 (2008) 011 [arXiv:0802.3160].
10. K. Choi, A. Falkowski, H.P. Nilles, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, Stability of ux compacti cations and the pattern of supersymmetry breaking, JHEP 11 (2004) 076 [hep-th/0411066].
11. S.P. de Alwis, Effective potentials for light moduli, Phys. Lett. B 626 (2005) 223 [hep-th/0506266].
12. S.P. de Alwis, On integrating out heavy fields in SUSY theories, Phys. Lett. B 628 (2005) 183 [hep-th/0506267].
13. A. Achucarro and K. Sousa, F-term uplifting and moduli stabilization consistent with Kahler invariance, JHEP 03 (2008) 002 [arXiv:0712.3460].
14. A. Achucarro, S. Hardeman and K. Sousa, Consistent decoupling of heavy scalars and moduli in N = 1 supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 101901 [arXiv:0806.4364].
15. A. Ach ucarro, S. Hardeman, J. Oberreuter, K. Schalm and T. van der Aalst, Decoupling limits in two-sector supergravities, to appear.
16. S.C. Davis and M. Postma, Successfully combining SUGRA hybrid in ation and moduli stabilisation, JCAP 04 (2008) 022 [arXiv:0801.2116].
17. T.W.B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387.
18. R. Jeannerot, J. Rocher and M. Sakellariadou, How generic is cosmic string formation in SUSY GUTs, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 103514 [hep-ph/0308134].
19. F.L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, The standard model Higgs boson as the in aton, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 703 [arXiv:0710.3755].
20. C. Germani and A. Kehagias, New model of in ation with non-minimal derivative coupling of standard model Higgs boson to gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 011302 [arXiv:1003.2635].
21. C.P. Burgess, J.M. Cline, H. Stoica and F. Quevedo, In ation in realistic D-brane models, JHEP 09 (2004) 033 [hep-th/0403119].
22. S. Groot Nibbelink and B.J.W. van Tent, Density perturbations arising from multiple field slow-roll in ation, hep-ph/0011325.
23. S. Groot Nibbelink and B.J.W. van Tent, Scalar perturbations during multiple field slow-roll in ation, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 613 [hep-ph/0107272].
24. L. Covi et al., Constraints on modular in ation in supergravity and string theory, JHEP 08 (2008) 055 [arXiv:0805.3290].
25. L. Covi et al., De Sitter vacua in no-scale supergravities and Calabi-Yau string models, JHEP 06 (2008) 057 [arXiv:0804.1073].
26. L. Covi, M. Gomez-Reino, C. Gross, G.A. Palma and C.A. Scrucca, Constructing de Sitter vacua in no-scale string models without uplifting, JHEP 03 (2009) 146 [arXiv:0812.3864].
27. A. Dymarsky, I.R. Klebanov, L. McAllister and P.J. Steinhardt, A Delicate Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 141601 [arXiv:0705.3837].
28. S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde and S.P. Trivedi, De Sitter vacua in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005 [hep-th/0301240].
29. S.B. Giddings, S. Kachru and J. Polchinski, Hierarchies from uxes in string compacti cations, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 106006 [hep-th/0105097].
30. D. Baumann and L. McAllister, Advances in in ation in string theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 59 (2009) 67 [arXiv:0901.0265].
31. L. McAllister and E. Silverstein, String cosmology: a review, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 565 [arXiv:0710.2951].
32. A. Achucarro, S. Hardeman and K. Sousa, F-term uplifting and the supersymmetric integration of heavy moduli, JHEP 11 (2008) 003 [arXiv:0809.1441].
33. A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G.A. Palma and S.P. Patil, Mass hierarchies and non-decoupling in multi-scalar field dynamics, arXiv:1005.3848.
34. R. Kallosh and A. Linde, New models of chaotic in ation in supergravity, JCAP 11 (2010) 011 [arXiv:1008.3375].
35. S. Mollerach, Isocurvature baryon perturbations and in ation, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 313.
36. D. Polarski and A.A. Starobinsky, Isocurvature perturbations in multiple in ationary models, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 6123 [astro-ph/9404061].
37. A.D. Linde and V.F. Mukhanov, NonGaussian isocurvature perturbations from in ation, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 535 [astro-ph/9610219].
38. J.-c. Hwang and H. Noh, Cosmological perturbations with multiple fluids and fields, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 527 [astro-ph/0103244].
39. D. Wands, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, An observational test of two- field in ation, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 043520 [astro-ph/0205253].
40. F. Di Marco, F. Finelli and R. Brandenberger, Adiabatic and isocurvature perturbations for multi field generalized Einstein models, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 063512 [astro-ph/0211276].
41. B.J.W. van Tent, Multiple- field in ation and the CMB, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 (2004) 349 [astro-ph/0307048].
42. ld in ation in a slow-roll expansion, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 043529 [astro-ph/0605679].
43. D. Wands, Multiple field in ation, Lect. Notes Phys. 738 (2008) 275 [astro-ph/0702187].
44. Z. Lalak, D. Langlois, S. Pokorski and K. Turzynski, Curvature and isocurvature perturbations in two-field in ation, JCAP 07 (2007) 014 [arXiv:0704.0212].
45. K.A. Malik and D. Wands, Cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rept. 475 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0809.4944].
46. D. Langlois, F. Vernizzi and D. Wands, Non-linear isocurvature perturbations and non-gaussianities, JCAP 12 (2008) 004 [arXiv:0809.4646].
47. D. Langlois and S. Renaux-Petel, Perturbations in generalized multi-field in ation, JCAP 04 (2008) 017 [arXiv:0801.1085].
48. D. Langlois, S. Renaux-Petel, D.A. Steer and T. Tanaka, Primordial uctuations and non-gaussianities in multi-field DBI in ation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 061301 [arXiv:0804.3139].
49. D. Langlois, S. Renaux-Petel, D.A. Steer and T. Tanaka, Primordial perturbations and non-gaussianities in DBI and general multi-field in ation, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 063523 [arXiv:0806.0336].
50. G.I. Rigopoulos, E.P.S. Shellard and B.J.W. van Tent, Non-linear perturbations in multiple-field in ation, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 083521 [astro-ph/0504508].
51. C.M. Peterson and M. Tegmark, Testing two-field in ation, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 023522 [arXiv:1005.4056].
52. S. Cremonini, Z. Lalak and K. Turzynski, Strongly coupled perturbations in two-field in ationary models, JCAP 03 (2011) 016 [arXiv:1010.3021].
53. L. Verde, L.-M. Wang, A. Heavens and M. Kamionkowski, Large-scale structure, the cosmic microwave background and primordial non-Gaussianity, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 313 (2000) L141 [astro-ph/9906301].
54. N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Non-gaussianity from in ation, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 103505 [hep-ph/0112261].
55. F. Bernardeau and J.-P. Uzan, Non-gaussianity in multi-field in ation, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 103506 [hep-ph/0207295].
56. D. Seery and J.E. Lidsey, Primordial non-gaussianities from multiple-field in ation, JCAP 09 (2005) 011 [astro-ph/0506056].
57. G.I. Rigopoulos, E.P.S. Shellard and B.J.W. van Tent, Large non-gaussianity in multiple-field in ation, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 083522 [astro-ph/0506704].
58. G.I. Rigopoulos, E.P.S. Shellard and B.J.W. van Tent, Quantitative bispectra from multifield in ation, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 083512 [astro-ph/0511041].
59. F. Vernizzi and D. Wands, Non-gaussianities in two-field in ation, JCAP 05 (2006) 019 [astro-ph/0603799].
60. A.J. Tolley and M. Wyman, The Gelaton scenario: equilateral non-gaussianity from multi-field dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 043502 [arXiv:0910.1853].
61. X. Chen and Y. Wang, Large non-gaussianities with intermediate shapes from quasi-single field in ation, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 063511 [arXiv:0909.0496].
62. X. Chen and Y. Wang, Quasi-single field in ation and non-gaussianities, JCAP 04 (2010) 027 [arXiv:0911.3380].
63. WMAP collaboration, E. Komatsu et al., Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: cosmological interpretation, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192 (2011) 18 [arXiv:1001.4538].
64. Planck collaboration, Planck: the scienti c programme, astro-ph/0604069.
65. X. Dong, B. Horn, E. Silverstein and A. Westphal, Simple exercises to atten your potential, arXiv:1011.4521.