The impact of missing background data on subpopulation estimation

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 293-312

  Rutkowski, Leslie ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053241964     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: 17453984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00144.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Direct Estimation Software Interactive (DESI) (2009). Version 3.23 [Computer software and manual]. Princeton, NJ Educational Testing Service.
2. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Gonzalez, E. (2009). GenItmDat macro for SAS. [SAS macro]. Princeton, NJ Educational Testing Service.
4. Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 87-114). New York, NY Wiley.
5. Little, R., & Rubin, D. (1983). On jointly estimating parameters and missing data by maximizing the complete-data likelihood. The American Statistician, 37, 218-220.
6. Lord, F. (1962). Estimating norms by item-sampling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 22, 259-267.
7. Martin, M., Mullis, I., & Kennedy, A. (Eds.) (2007). PIRLS 2006 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
8. Mislevy, R. J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56, 177-196.
9. Mislevy, R. J., Beaton, A. E., Kaplan, B., & Sheehan, K. M. (1992). Estimating population characteristics from sparse matrix samples of item responses. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 133-161.
10. Mislevy, R. J., Johnson, E. G., & Muraki, E. (1992). Scaling procedures in NAEP. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 131-154.
11. Olson, J., Martin, M., & Mullis, I. (Eds.) (2008). TIMSS 2007 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
12. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris, France OECD.
13. Peugh, J., & Enders, C. (2004). Missing data in educational research: A review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74, 525-556.
14. Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581-592.
15. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY Wiley.
16. Schafer, J., & Graham, J. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
17. Scientific Software International, Inc. (2003). Parscale for Windows (Version 4.1). Chicago Scientific Software International, Inc.
18. Shoemaker, D. M. (1973). Principles and procedures of multiple matrix sampling. Cambridge, MA Ballinger Publishing Company.
19. von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E., & Mislevy, R. (2009). Plausible values: What are they and why do we need them? IERI Monograph Series: Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessments, 2, 9-36.