User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 711-716

  Gadd, Cynthia S ^a   Ho, Yun Xian ^a   Cala, Cather Marie ^a   Blakemore, Dana ^b   Chen, Qingxia ^b   Frisse, Mark E ^a   Johnson, Kevin B ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MIDDLE AGED; TENNESSEE; TRUST; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80053241215     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000281     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lorenzi N. Strategies for Creating Successful Local Health Information Infrastructure Initiatives. Washington DC, USA: Services USDoHaH, 2003:1-27.
2. Thompson T, Brailer D. The Decade of Health Information Technology: Delivering Consumer-centric and Information-rich Health Care Framework for Strategic Action. Washington DC, USA: Department of Health and Human Services, 2004:178.
3. Shapiro JS, Kannry J, Lipton M, et al. Approaches to patient health information exchange and their impact on emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:426-32.
4. Finnell JT, Overhage JM, Dexter PR, et al. Community clinical data exchange for emergency medicine patients. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:235-8.
5. Cheng PH, Chen HS, Lai F, et al. The strategic use of standardized information exchange technology in a university health system. Telemed J E Health 2010;16:314-26.
6. Weir CR, Crockett R, Gohlinghorst S, et al. Does user satisfaction relate to adoption behavior? an exploratory analysis using CPRS implementation. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:913-17.
7. Davis F. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13:319-40.
8. Johnson KB. Barriers that impede the adoption of pediatric information technology. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:1374-9.
9. Verhoeven F, Steehouder MF, Hendrix RM, et al. Factors affecting health care workers' adoption of a website with infection control guidelines. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:663-78.
10. Gould DJ, Terrell MA, Fleming J. A usability study of users' perceptions toward a multimedia computer-assisted learning tool for neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2008;1:175-83.
11. Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub D. Trust and tam in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly 2003;27:51-90.
12. Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Affair (Millwood) 2004;23:116-26.
13. Anderson JG, Aydin CE. Evaluating the impact of health care information systems. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997;13:380-93.
14. Koivunen M, Hatonen H, Valimaki M. Barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of an interactive Internet-portal application for patient education in psychiatric hospitals. Patient Educ Couns 2008;70:412-19.
15. Midsouth e-Health Alliance, 2004. http://www.midsoutheha.org (accessed 1 Feb 2011).
16. Frisse ME, King JK, Rice WB, et al. A regional health information exchange: architecture and implementation. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:212-16.
17. Johnson KB, Gadd C. Playing smallball: approaches to evaluating pilot health information exchange systems. J Biomed Inform 2007;40(6 Suppl):S21-6.
18. Davis F, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 1989;35:982-1003.
19. Venkatesh V, Morris MG. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly 2000;24:115-39.
20. Chin JP, Diehl VA, Norman KL. Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the humanecomputer interface. Proc CHI 1988:213-21.
21. Harper B, Slaughter L, Norman KL. Questionnaire administration via the WWW: a validation and reliability study for a user satisfaction questionnaire. In: Proc WebNet, 1997:808-10.
22. Frisse ME. State and community-based efforts to foster interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1190-6.
23. Vest JR, Zhao H, Jaspserson J, et al. Factors motivating and affecting health information exchange usage. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:143-9.
24. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)e a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-81.
25. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata J 2004;4:227-41.
26. Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: Further update of ice, with an emphasis on categorical variables. Stata J 2009;9:466-77.
27. Boyatzis R. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1998.
28. Landauer T. Research methods in human-computer interaction. In: Helander M, Landauer T, Prabhu P, eds. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. New York, NY: Elsevier, 1998:203-27.
29. Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
30. Miller RH, Miller BS. The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange: what happened? Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:568-80.
31. DeBor G, Diamond C, Grodecki D, et al. A tale of three citiesdwhere RHIOS meet the NHIN. J Healthc Inf Manag 2006;20:63-70.
32. Morris M, Viswanath V. Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force. Pers Psychol 2000;53:375-403.
33. Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly 1992;16:227-47.
34. Matell MS, Jacoby J. Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Study I: reliability and validity. Educ Psychol Meas 1971;31:657-74.
35. Halamka J, Aranow M, Ascenzo C, et al. E-Prescribing collaboration in Massachusetts: early experiences from regional prescribing projects. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:239-44.