Combined phylogenetic and genomic approaches for the high-throughput study of microbial habitat adaptation

Trends in Microbiology

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 472-482

  Zaneveld, Jesse R R ^a   Parfrey, Laura Wegener ^a   Van Treuren, Will ^a   Lozupone, Catherine ^a   Clemente, Jose C ^a   Knights, Dan ^b   Stombaugh, Jesse ^a   Kuczynski, Justin ^a   Knight, Rob ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UCB 450   (United States)

^c HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA 16S;

ADAPTATION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARCHAEBACTERIUM; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIAL SURVIVAL; CONSERVATION GENETICS; DNA SEQUENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; EUKARYOTE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC TRAIT; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; HABITAT; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MACHINE LEARNING; METAGENOMICS; MICROORGANISM; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RNA SEQUENCE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ECOSYSTEM; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 80053234218     PISSN: 0966842X     EISSN: 18784380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.07.006     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Pace N.R. A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 1997, 276:734-740.
2. Ciccarelli F.D., et al. Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 2006, 311:1283-1287.
3. Johnson Z.I., et al. Niche partitioning among Prochlorococcus ecotypes along ocean-scale environmental gradients. Science 2006, 311:1737-1740.
4. Lugtenberg B., Kamilova F. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63:541-556.
5. Womack A.M., et al. Biodiversity and biogeography of the atmosphere. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2010, 365:3645-3653.
6. Cheesman S.E., et al. Epithelial cell proliferation in the developing zebrafish intestine is regulated by the Wnt pathway and microbial signaling via Myd88. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108(Suppl. 1):4570-4577.
7. Samuel B.S., et al. Effects of the gut microbiota on host adiposity are modulated by the short-chain fatty-acid binding G protein-coupled receptor, Gpr41. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:16767-16772.
8. Sharon G., et al. Commensal bacteria play a role in mating preference of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:20051-20056.
9. Caporaso J.G., et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108(Suppl. 1):4516-4522.
10. Qin J., et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464:59-65.
11. Peterson J., et al. The NIH Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res. 2009, 19:2317-2323.
12. Stewart F.J., et al. Community transcriptomics reveals universal patterns of protein sequence conservation in natural microbial communities. Genome Biol. 2011, 12:R26.
13. Wu D., et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009, 462:1056-1060.
14. Lozupone C.A., Knight R. Global patterns in bacterial diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:11436-11440.
15. Ley R.E., et al. Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6:776-788.
16. von Mering C., et al. Quantitative phylogenetic assessment of microbial communities in diverse environments. Science 2007, 315:1126-1130.
17. Pedros-Alio C. Ecology. Dipping into the rare biosphere. Science 2007, 315:192-193.
18. Moran N.A., et al. Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2008, 42:165-190.
19. Konstantinidis K.T., Tiedje J.M. Trends between gene content and genome size in prokaryotic species with larger genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:3160-3165.
20. Rhodes M.E., et al. Amino acid signatures of salinity on an environmental scale with a focus on the Dead Sea. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12:2613-2623.
21. Vieira-Silva S., Rocha E.P. The systemic imprint of growth and its uses in ecological (meta)genomics. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000808.
22. Klappenbach J.A., et al. rRNA operon copy number reflects ecological strategies of bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66:1328-1333.
23. Klappenbach J.A., et al. rrndb: the Ribosomal RNA Operon Copy Number Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29:181-184.
24. Stevenson B.S., Schmidt T.M. Life history implications of rRNA gene copy number in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70:6670-6677.
25. Cho Y.J., et al. Genomic evolution of Vibrio cholerae. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13:646-651.
26. Deng X., et al. Probing the pan-genome of Listeria monocytogenes: new insights into intraspecific niche expansion and genomic diversification. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:500.
27. Binnewies T.T., et al. Ten years of bacterial genome sequencing: comparative-genomics-based discoveries. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2006, 6:165-185.
28. DeLong E.F., et al. Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean's interior. Science 2006, 311:496-503.
29. Dinsdale E.A., et al. Functional metagenomic profiling of nine biomes. Nature 2008, 452:629-632.
30. Chaffron S., et al. A global network of coexisting microbes from environmental and whole-genome sequence data. Genome Res. 2010, 20:947-959.
31. Merhej V., et al. Massive comparative genomic analysis reveals convergent evolution of specialized bacteria. Biol. Direct. 2009, 4:13.
32. Zaneveld J.R., et al. Ribosomal RNA diversity predicts genome diversity in gut bacteria and their relatives. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:3869-3879.
33. David L.A., Alm E.J. Rapid evolutionary innovation during an Archaean genetic expansion. Nature 2011, 469:93-96.
34. Schliep K., et al. Harvesting evolutionary signals in a forest of prokaryotic gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28:1393-1405.
35. Ishoey T., et al. Genomic sequencing of single microbial cells from environmental samples. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2008, 11:198-204.
36. Coleman M.L., Chisholm S.W. Ecosystem-specific selection pressures revealed through comparative population genomics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:18634-18639.
37. Narasingarao P., et al. De novo metagenomic assembly reveals abundant novel major lineage of Archaea in hypersaline microbial communities. ISME J. 2011, 10.1038/ismej.2011.78.
38. Lozupone C., Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:8228-8235.
39. Nemergut D.R., et al. Global patterns in the biogeography of bacterial taxa. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13:135-144.
40. Lozupone C.A., et al. The convergence of carbohydrate active gene repertoires in human gut microbes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:15076-15081.
41. Yilmaz P., et al. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29:415-420.
42. Kottmann R., et al. A standard MIGS/MIMS compliant XML schema: toward the development of the Genomic Contextual Data Markup Language (GCDML). OMICS 2008, 12:115-121.
43. Meyer F., et al. The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9:386.
44. Gilbert J.A., et al. The Earth, Microbiome Project: meeting report of the " 1 EMP meeting on sample selection and acquisition" at Argonne National Laboratory October 6 2010. Stand. Genomic Sci. 2010, 3:249-253.
45. Ramette A. Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 62:142-160.
46. Knight R., et al. PyCogent: a toolkit for making sense from sequence. Genome Biol. 2007, 8:R171.
47. Rousk J., et al. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J. 2010, 4:1340-1351.
48. Fierer N., et al. Forensic identification using skin bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:6477-6481.
49. Benson D.A., et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D32-D37.
50. Liolios K., et al. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:D346-D354.
51. Knights D., et al. Supervised classification of human microbiota. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35:343-359.
52. Lee J.W., et al. An extensive comparison of recent classification tools applied to microarray data. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2005, 48:869-885.
53. Muegge B.D., et al. Diet drives convergence in gut microbiome functions across mammalian phylogeny and within humans. Science 2011, 332:970-974.
54. Werner J.J., et al. Bacterial community structures are unique and resilient in full-scale bioenergy systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:4158-4163.
55. Smith A., et al. Novel application of a statistical technique, Random Forests, in a bacterial source tracking study. Water Res. 2010, 44:4067-4076.
56. Efron B., Tibshirani R. Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1997, 92:548-560.
57. Aitchison J. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data 1986, Chapman & Hall.
58. Harvey P.H., Pagel M.D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology 1991, Oxford University Press.
59. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 1985, 125:1-15.
60. Blomberg S.P., et al. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 2003, 57:717-745.
61. Laurin M. Assessment of the relative merits of a few methods to detect evolutionary trends. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59:689-704.
62. Freckleton R.P., et al. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 2002, 160:712-726.
63. Jombart T., et al. adephylo: new tools for investigating the phylogenetic signal in biological traits. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:1907-1909.
64. Kembel S.W., et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:1463-1464.
65. Horner-Devine M.C., et al. A comparison of taxon co-occurrence patterns for macro- and microorganisms. Ecology 2007, 88:1345-1353.
66. Zaneveld J.R., et al. Are all horizontal gene transfers created equal? Prospects for mechanism-based studies of HGT patterns. Microbiology 2008, 154:1-15.
67. Galtier N., Daubin V. Dealing with incongruence in phylogenomic analyses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2008, 363:4023-4029.
68. Koonin E.V., et al. Comparison of phylogenetic trees and search for a central trend in the " forest of life" J. Comput. Biol. 2011, 18:917-924.
69. Andam C.P., et al. Biased gene transfer mimics patterns created through shared ancestry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:10679-10684.
70. Caporaso J.G., et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:335-336.
71. Schloss P.D., et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:7537-7541.
72. Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1586-1591.
73. Carmel L., et al. EREM: parameter estimation and ancestral reconstruction by expectation-maximization algorithm for a probabilistic model of genomic binary characters evolution. Adv. Bioinform. 2010, 2010:167408.
74. Paradis E., et al. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:289-290.
75. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
76. Drummond A.J., Rambaut A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:214.
77. Dray S., Dufour A.B. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J. Stat. Software 2007, 22:1-20.
78. Than C., et al. PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9:322.
79. Podell S., et al. A database of phylogenetically atypical genes in archaeal and bacterial genomes, identified using the DarkHorse algorithm. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9:419.
80. Schliep K.P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:592-593.
81. Jombart T., et al. Putting phylogeny into the analysis of biological traits: a methodological approach. J. Theor. Biol. 2010, 264:693-701.
82. Pallen M.J., Wren B.W. Bacterial pathogenomics. Nature 2007, 449:835-842.
83. Gray M.W. Evolution of organellar genomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1999, 9:678-687.
84. Archibald J.M., Lane C.E. Going, going, not quite gone: nucleomorphs as a case study in nuclear genome reduction. J. Hered. 2009, 100:582-590.
85. Keeling P.J., et al. The reduced genome of the parasitic microsporidian Enterocytozoon bieneusi lacks genes for core carbon metabolism. Genome Biol. Evol. 2010, 2:304-309.
86. Giovannoni S.J., et al. Genome streamlining in a cosmopolitan oceanic bacterium. Science 2005, 309:1242-1245.
87. Luo H., et al. Genome reduction by deletion of paralogs in the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 10.1093/molbev/msr081.
88. Kawecki T.J. Adaptation to marginal habitats: contrasting influence of the dispersal rate on the fate of alleles with small and large effects. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2000, 267:1315-1320.
89. Sokurenko E.V., et al. Source-sink dynamics of virulence evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4:548-555.
90. Jones S.E., Lennon J.T. Dormancy contributes to the maintenance of microbial diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:5881-5886.
91. Knights D., et al. Bayesian community-wide culture-independent microbial source tracking. Nat. Methods 2011, 10.1038/nmeth.1650.
92. Fitch W.M. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst. Zool. 1970, 19:99-113.
93. Koshi J.M., Goldstein R.A. Probabilistic reconstruction of ancestral protein sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1996, 42:313-320.
94. Pagel M., et al. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 2004, 53:673-684.
95. Yokoyama S., et al. Elucidation of phenotypic adaptations: molecular analyses of dim-light vision proteins in vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:13480-13485.
96. Thornton J.W., et al. Resurrecting the ancestral steroid receptor: ancient origin of estrogen signaling. Science 2003, 301:1714-1717.
97. Gabaldon T., Huynen M.A. Reconstruction of the proto-mitochondrial metabolism. Science 2003, 301:609.
98. Paten B., et al. Genome-wide nucleotide-level mammalian ancestor reconstruction. Genome Res. 2008, 18:1829-1843.
99. Marri P.R., et al. Gene gain and gene loss in Streptococcus: is it driven by habitat?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:2379-2391.
100. Ackerly D.D., et al. Niche evolution and adaptive radiation: testing the order of trait divergence. Ecology 2006, 87:S50-S61.