-
1
-
-
33745931889
-
Good enough: A primer on the analysis and interpretation of noninferiority trials
-
Kaul S, Diamond GA. Good enough: A primer on the analysis and interpretation of non-inferiority trials. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:62-9. (Pubitemid 46780603)
-
(2006)
Annals of Internal Medicine
, vol.145
, Issue.1
, pp. 62-69
-
-
Kaul, S.1
Diamond, G.A.2
-
3
-
-
61749090504
-
Noninferiority and equivalence designs: Issues and implications for mental health research
-
Greene CJ, Morland LA, Durkalski VL, Frueh BC. Noninferiority and equivalence designs: Issues and implications for mental health research. J Trauma Stress 2008;21:433-9.
-
(2008)
J Trauma Stress
, vol.21
, pp. 433-439
-
-
Greene, C.J.1
Morland, L.A.2
Durkalski, V.L.3
Frueh, B.C.4
-
4
-
-
0020308864
-
'Proving the null hypothesis' in clinical trials
-
DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1
-
Blackwelder WC. "Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1982;3:345-53. (Pubitemid 13113168)
-
(1982)
Controlled Clinical Trials
, vol.3
, Issue.4
, pp. 345-353
-
-
Blackwelder, W.C.1
-
5
-
-
0037472837
-
Non-inferiority trials: Design concepts and issues - The encounters of academic consultants in statistics
-
DOI 10.1002/sim.1425
-
D'Agostino RB Sr, Massaro JM, Sullivan LM. Non-inferiority trials: Design concepts and issues - The encounters of academic consultants in statistics. Stat Med 2003;22:169-86. (Pubitemid 36163579)
-
(2003)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.22
, Issue.2
, pp. 169-186
-
-
D'Agostino Sr., R.B.1
Massaro, J.M.2
Sullivan, L.M.3
-
6
-
-
77951086640
-
What does 'non-inferior to' really mean? A clinician thinking out loud
-
Ricci S. What does 'non-inferior to' really mean? A clinician thinking out loud. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:607-8.
-
(2010)
Cerebrovasc Dis
, vol.29
, pp. 607-608
-
-
Ricci, S.1
-
7
-
-
0042670044
-
The pros and cons of noninferiority trials
-
DOI 10.1046/j.1472-8206.2003.00162.x
-
Pocock SJ. The pros and cons of noninferiority trials. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2003;17:483-90. (Pubitemid 36920651)
-
(2003)
Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology
, vol.17
, Issue.4
, pp. 483-490
-
-
Pocock, S.J.1
-
9
-
-
27544490169
-
Equivalence and noninferiority trials: Are they viable alternatives for registration of new drugs? (III)
-
Pater C. Equivalence and noninferiority trials: Are they viable alternatives for registration of new drugs? (III). Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2004;5: 8.
-
(2004)
Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med
, vol.5
, pp. 8
-
-
Pater, C.1
-
11
-
-
2542465496
-
-
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Guidance for Industry, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials, March
-
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Guidance for Industry, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials, March 2010.
-
(2010)
Food and Drug Administration
-
-
-
12
-
-
12244264188
-
Some fundamental issues with non-inferiority testing in active controlled trials
-
DOI 10.1002/sim.1315
-
James Hung HM, Wang SJ, Tsong Y, Lawrence J, O'Neil RT. Some fundamental issues with non-inferiority testing in active controlled trials. Stat Med 2003;22:213-25. (Pubitemid 36163582)
-
(2003)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.22
, Issue.2
, pp. 213-225
-
-
Hung, H.M.J.1
Wang, S.-J.2
Tsong, Y.3
Lawrence, J.4
O'Neil, R.T.5
-
14
-
-
38949173080
-
Current issues in non-inferiority trials
-
DOI 10.1002/sim.2855
-
Fleming TR. Current issues in non-inferiority trials. Stat Med 2008;27:317-32. (Pubitemid 351227869)
-
(2008)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.27
, Issue.3
, pp. 317-332
-
-
Fleming, T.R.1
-
15
-
-
0037472846
-
Non-inferiority trials: The 'at least as good as' criterion
-
DOI 10.1002/sim.1137
-
Laster LL, Johnson MF. Non-inferiority trials: The 'at least as good as' criterion. Stat Med 2003;22:187-200. (Pubitemid 36163580)
-
(2003)
Statistics in Medicine
, vol.22
, Issue.2
, pp. 187-200
-
-
Laster, L.L.1
Johnson, M.F.2
-
17
-
-
78349285547
-
Bio-creep in non-inferiority clinical trials
-
Everson-Stewart S, Emerson SS. Bio-creep in non-inferiority clinical trials. Stat Med 2010;29:2769-80.
-
(2010)
Stat Med
, vol.29
, pp. 2769-2780
-
-
Everson-Stewart, S.1
Emerson, S.S.2
-
19
-
-
34548626276
-
The role of intention to treat in analysis of noninferiority studies
-
DOI 10.1177/1740774507079443
-
Wiens BL, Zhao W. The role of intention to treat in analysis of non-inferiority studies. Clin Trials 2007;4:286-91. (Pubitemid 47400540)
-
(2007)
Clinical Trials
, vol.4
, Issue.3
, pp. 286-291
-
-
Wiens, B.L.1
Zhao, W.2
-
21
-
-
33644789375
-
Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials
-
DOI 10.1001/jama.295.10.1147
-
Le Henanff A, Giraudeau B, Baron G, Ravaud P. Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. JAMA 2006;295:1147-51. (Pubitemid 43352344)
-
(2006)
Journal of the American Medical Association
, vol.295
, Issue.10
, pp. 1147-1151
-
-
Le Henanff, A.1
Giraudeau, B.2
Baron, G.3
Ravaud, P.4
-
22
-
-
4143096170
-
Current issues in clinical equivalence trials
-
DOI 10.1177/154405910408301S23
-
Blackwelder WC. Current issues in clinical equivalence trials. J Dent Res 2004;83:C113-5. (Pubitemid 44126052)
-
(2004)
Journal of Dental Research
, vol.83
, Issue.SPEC. ISS. C
-
-
Blackwelder, W.C.1
-
23
-
-
33644972213
-
Planned equivalence or noninferiority trials versus unplanned noninferiority claims: Are they equal?
-
DOI 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.9684
-
Zee BC. Planned equivalence or non-inferiority trials versus unplanned noninferiority claims: Are they equal? J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1026-8. (Pubitemid 46638796)
-
(2006)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
, vol.24
, Issue.7
, pp. 1026-1028
-
-
Zee, B.C.-Y.1
-
24
-
-
33644792767
-
Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement
-
DOI 10.1001/jama.295.10.1152
-
Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ; CONSORT Group. Reporting of non-inferiority and equivalence randomized trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 2006;295:1152-60. (Pubitemid 43352345)
-
(2006)
Journal of the American Medical Association
, vol.295
, Issue.10
, pp. 1152-1160
-
-
Piaggio, G.1
Elbourne, D.R.2
Altman, D.G.3
Pocock, S.J.4
Evans, S.J.W.5
-
25
-
-
18044403803
-
Switching between superiority and non-inferiority
-
Murray GD. Switching between superiority and non-inferiority. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001;52:219.
-
(2001)
Br J Clin Pharmacol
, vol.52
, pp. 219
-
-
Murray, G.D.1
-
26
-
-
36549021534
-
Non-inferiority trials are unethical because they disregard patients' interests
-
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61604-3, PII S0140673607616043
-
Garattini S, Bertele V. Non-inferiority trials are unethical because they disregard patients' interests. Lancet 2007;370:1875-7. (Pubitemid 350180009)
-
(2007)
Lancet
, vol.370
, Issue.9602
, pp. 1875-1877
-
-
Garattini, S.1
Bertele, V.2
-
28
-
-
40649120683
-
The ethics of non-inferiority trials
-
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60408-0, PII S0140673608604080
-
Menten J, Boelaert M. The ethics of non-inferiority trials. Lancet 2008;371:896;author reply 896-7. (Pubitemid 351375268)
-
(2008)
The Lancet
, vol.371
, Issue.9616
, pp. 896
-
-
Menten, J.1
Boelaert, M.2
-
29
-
-
40649102179
-
The ethics of non-inferiority trials
-
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60404-3, PII S0140673608604043
-
Nunn AJ, Meredith SK, Spigelman MK, Ginsberg AM, Gillespie SH. The ethics of non-inferiority trials. Lancet 2008;371:895;author reply 896-7. (Pubitemid 351375264)
-
(2008)
The Lancet
, vol.371
, Issue.9616
, pp. 895
-
-
Nunn, A.J.1
Meredith, S.K.2
Spigelman, M.K.3
Ginsberg, A.M.4
Gillespie, S.H.5
-
30
-
-
40649103142
-
The ethics of non-inferiority trials
-
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60405-5, PII S0140673608604055
-
Gandjour A. The ethics of non-inferiority trials. Lancet 2008;371:895;author reply 896-7. (Pubitemid 351375265)
-
(2008)
The Lancet
, vol.371
, Issue.9616
, pp. 895
-
-
Gandjour, A.1
-
31
-
-
40649126119
-
The ethics of non-inferiority trials
-
DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60406-7, PII S0140673608604067
-
Soliman EZ. The ethics of non-inferiority trials. Lancet 2008;371:895;author reply 896-7. (Pubitemid 351375266)
-
(2008)
The Lancet
, vol.371
, Issue.9616
, pp. 895
-
-
Soliman, E.Z.1
-
32
-
-
2542465496
-
-
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Guidance for Industry, Antibacterial Drug Products: Use of Non-inferiority Trials to Support Approval, November
-
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Guidance for Industry, Antibacterial Drug Products: Use of Non-inferiority Trials to Support Approval, November 2010.
-
(2010)
Food and Drug Administration
-
-
-
33
-
-
58149242821
-
Issues in non-inferiority trials: The evidence in community-acquired pneumonia
-
Fleming TR, Powers JH. Issues in non-inferiority trials: The evidence in community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2008;47:S108-20.
-
(2008)
Clin Infect Dis
, vol.47
-
-
Fleming, T.R.1
Powers, J.H.2
|