Spatially explicit assessment of local biomass availability for distributed biogas production via anaerobic co-digestion - Mediterranean case study

Renewable Energy

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 261-270

  Zubaryeva, Alyona ^a,b   Zaccarelli, Nicola ^a   Del Giudice, Cecilia ^a   Zurlini, Giovanni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Analytic hierarchy process; Biogas; Decision support; GIS

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; BIO-ENERGY; BIO-ENERGY SYSTEMS; BIODIVERSITY LOSS; BIOENERGY INDUSTRY; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; DECISION MAKERS; DECISION-SUPPORT; DISCRETE DATA; EUROPEAN LEVELS; INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LAND AREAS; LAND-USE CHANGE; LOCAL BIOMASS; LOCAL SCALE; LOCAL SOURCE; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; SPATIAL RELATIONS; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT; TERRITORIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOGAS; BIOMASS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; FEEDSTOCKS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LAND USE; PLANNING; RATING; REGIONAL PLANNING; TIME SERIES; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOENERGY; BIOGAS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GAS PRODUCTION; GIS; HABITAT LOSS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; LAND USE CHANGE; LOCAL PLANNING; REGIONAL PLANNING; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

MEDITERRANEAN REGION;

EID: 80053227975     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.021     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Sims R., Schock R., Adegbululgbe A., Fenhann J., Konstantinaviciute I., Moomaw W., et al. Energy supply. Climate change 2007: mitigation. contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2007, 322. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Metz, O. Davidson, P. Bosch, R. Dave, L. Meyer (Eds.).
2. European Council On the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Off J Eur Union 2009, C 045E:132-133. European Union, Brussels.
3. I.E.A.OECD/IEA World energy outlook 2010, IEA, 731.
4. European Council On the landfill waste. Off J Eur Union 1999, L82. European Union, Brusselspp. 0001-0019.
5. Eur Obser'ER Biogas barometer 2010, Eur Obser'ER, 105-119.
6. Tricase C., Lombardi M. State of the art and prospects of Italian biogas production from animal sewage: technical-economic considerations. Renew Energy 2009, 34:477-485.
7. Karellas S., Boukis I., Kontopoulos G. Development of an investment decision tool for biogas production from agricultural waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010, 14:1273-1282.
8. Manfren M., Caputo P., Costa G. Paradigm shift in urban energy systems through distributed generation. Appl Energy 2011, 88:1032-1048.
9. Longden D., Brarnmer J., Bastin L., Cooper N. Distributed or centralised energy-from-waste policy? Implications of technology and scale at municipal level. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2622-2634.
10. van der Horst D. NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy sitting controversies. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2705-2714.
11. Wang J.J., Jing Y.Y., Zhang C.F., Zhao J.H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009, 13:2263-2278.
12. Arampatzis G., Kiranoudis C.T., Scaloubacas P., Assimacopoulos D. A GIS-based decision support system for planning urban transportation policies. Eur J Operat Res 2004, 152:465-475.
13. Janke J.R. Multicriteria GIS modeling of wind and solar farms in Colorado. Renew Energy 2010, 35:2228-2234.
14. Jiang H., Eastman J.R. Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 2000, 14:173-184.
15. Vizzari M. Spatial modelling of potential landscape quality. Appl Geogry 2011, 31:108-118.
16. Haddad M.A., Anderson P.F. A GIS methodology to identify potential corn stover collection locations. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32:1097-1108.
17. Fiorese G., Guariso G. A GIS-based approach to evaluate biomass potential from energy crops at regional scale. Environ Model Softw 2010, 25:702-711.
18. Dagnall S., Hill J., Pegg D. Resource mapping and analysis of farm livestock manures - assessing the opportunities for biomass-to-energy schemes. Bioresour Technol 2000, 71:225-234.
19. Ma J.G., Scott N.R., DeGloria S.D., Lembo A.J. Siting analysis of farm-based centralized anaerobic digester systems for distributed generation using GIS. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 28:591-600.
20. Batzias F.A., Sidiras D.K., Spyrou E.K. Evaluating livestock manures for biogas production: a GIS based method. Renew Energy 2005, 30:1161-1176.
21. Bryan B.A., Ward J., Hobbs T. An assessment of the economic and. environmental potential of biomass production in an agricultural region. Land Use Policy 2008, 25:533-549.
22. Poeschl M., Ward S., Owende P. Prospects for expanded utilization of biogas in Germany. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010, 14:1782-1797.
23. Angelis-Dimakis A., Biberacher M., Dominguez J., Fiorese G., Gadocha S., Gnansounou E., et al. Methods and tools to evaluate the availability of renewable energy sources. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:1182-1200.
24. Gulli F. Small distributed generation versus centralised supply: a social cost-benefit analysis in the residential and service sectors. Energy Policy 2006, 34:804-832.
25. Calvert K. Geomatics and bioenergy feasibility assessments: taking stock and looking forward. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:1117-1124.
26. I.N.D.S. ISTAT, Demografia in cifre; 2009.
27. A.R.Administration Piano regionale di gestione dei rifiuti: aggiornamento con completamento e modifica. Boll della Region Puglia 2005, 15147-15721. Bari. R. Puglia (Ed.).
28. Ward A.J., Hobbs P.J., Holliman P.J., Jones D.L. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:7928-7940.
29. Bolzonella D., Battistoni P., Susini C., Cecchi F. Anaerobic codigestion of waste activated sludge and OFMSW: the experiences of Viareggio and Treviso plants (Italy). Water Sci Technol 2006, 53:203-211.
30. Alatriste-Mondragon F., Samar P., Cox H.H.J., Ahring B.K., Iranpour R. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal, farm, and industrial organic wastes: a survey of recent literature. Water Environ Res 2006, 78:607-636.
31. Hartmann H., Ahring B.K. Anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: influence of co-digestion with manure. Water Res 2005, 39:1543-1552.
32. Li R.P., Chen S.L., Li X.J. Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with dairy manure in a two-phase digestion system. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2010, 160:643-654.
33. Callaghan F.J., Wase D.A.J., Thayanithy K., Forster C.F. Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2002, 22:71-77.
34. Azbar N., Bayram A., Filibeli A., Muezzinoglu A., Sengul F., Ozer A. A review of waste management options in olive oil production. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2004, 34:209-247.
35. Azbar N., Keskin T., Yuruyen A. Enhancement of biogas production from olive mill effluent (OME) by co-digestion. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32:1195-1201.
36. Palmowski L. Making energy from grape marc using anaerobic digestion, Australian and New Zealand grapegrower and winemaker. Austr New Zealand Grapegrower Winemaker 2004, 491:50-52.
37. Dinuccio E., Balsari P., Gioelli F., Menardo S. Evaluation of the biogas productivity potential of some Italian agro-industrial biomasses. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:3780-3783.
38. Bouallagui H., Touhami Y., Cheikh R.B., Hamdi M. Bioreactor performance in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes. Process Biochem 2005, 40:989-995.
39. Menardo S., Gioelli F., Balsari P. The methane yield of digestate: effect of organic loading rate, hydraulic retention time, and plant feeding. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:2348-2351.
40. CTI Analisi technica delle potenzialità di diffusione degli impianti in provincia di Sondrio. Valutazione delle potenzialità di diffusione di impianti di biogas aziendali e/o consortili alimentati a biomassa, residui agroalimentari e frazione organica dei rifiuti solidi urbani. Progetto Interreg IIIA Italia - Svizzera 2007, Italian Termotechnical Committee (CTI).
41. ESRI ArcGIS spatial analyst: advanced GIS spatial analysis using raster and vector data. An ESRI white paper 2001, ESRI, Redlands, 13.
42. Boroushaki S., Malczewski J. Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS. Comput Geosci 2008, 34:399-410.
43. Saaty T. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 287.
44. EEA Maximising the environmental benefits of Europe's bioenergy potential 2008, European Environmental Agency, p. 94.
45. Raven R.P.J.M., Gregersen K.H. Biogas plants in Denmark: successes and setbacks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2007, 11:116-132.
46. Nadai A. " Planning" , " siting" and the local acceptance of wind power: some lessons from the French case. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2715-2726.
47. Assessorato all'ecologia, Apulia Region; 2010. Database on wastes per WMA and municipality. Available at http://www.rifiutiebonifica.puglia.it/.
48. Apulia Region Territorial Information System; 2010, Available at http://www.sit.puglia.it/.
49. Pellerano A, Pantaleo P, Tenerelli M, Capone A. Studio per la valorizzazione energetica di biomasses agro-forestali nella Regione Puglia. Dipartimento PROGESA, Università di Bari; 2007, p. 211.
50. N.Z.D. Database, Anagrafe Zootechnica. CSN di IZS Abruzzo e Molise; 2010.