Assessment of medical knowledge: The pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions

National Medical Journal of India

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 225-228

  Chandratilake, Madawa ^a   Davis, Margery ^a   Ponnamperuma, Gominda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOMBO   (Sri Lanka)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOMBO   (Sri Lanka)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; DECISION MAKING; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; REVIEW; STUDENT ATTITUDE;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS;

EID: 80053205113     PISSN: 0970258X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Written assessment. BMJ 2003;326:643-5.
2. Nnodim JO. Multiple-choice testing in anatomy. Med Educ 1992;26:301-9.
3. Anderson J. Multiple choice questions revisited. Med Teach 2004;26:110-13.
4. Downing Steven M. True-false, alternate-choice, and multiple-choice items. Educ Meas: Issues and practice 1992;11:27-30.
5. Case SM, Swanson DB. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical sciences. 3rd ed (revised). Philadelphia:National Board of Medical Examiners; 2002. Available at http://www.nbme.org/PDF/ItemWriting_2003/2003IWGwhole.pdf (accessed on 14 Jul 2011).
6. Albanese MA. Type K and other complex multiple-choice items: An analysis of research and item properties. Educ Meas: Issues and practice 1993;12:28-33.
7. Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. Different written assessment methods: What can be said about their strengths and weaknesses? Med Educ 2004;38:974-9.
8. Bridge D, Musial J, Frank R, Roe T, Sawilowsky S. Measurement practices: Methods for developing content valid student examinations. Med Teach 2003;25: 414-21.
9. Burton RF. Misinformation, partial knowledge and guessing in true/false tests. Med Educ 2002;36:805-11.
10. What is the right choice? Available at http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/ (accessed on 7 Jul 2009).
11. Gage NL, Berliner David C. Operant conditioning: A practical theory. In: Educational psychology. 2nd ed. Chicago:Rand McNally College Publishing Company; 1979: 277-8.
12. Pawlowski B, Rajinder A, Dunbar RIM. Sex differences in everyday risk-taking behavior in humans. Evol Psychol 2008;6:29-42.
13. Gullone E, Moore S. Adolescent risk-taking and the five-factor model of personality. J Adolesc 2000;23:393-407.
14. Frisbie DA. Multiple choice versus true-false: A comparison of reliabilities and concurrent validities. J Educ Meas 1973;10:297-304.
15. Oosterhof AC, Glasnapp DR. Comparative reliabilities and difficulties of the multiple-choice and true-false formats. J Experimental Educ 1974;42:62-4.
16. Ebel RL. Are true-false items useful? In: Ebel RL (ed). Practical problems in educational measurement. Lexington, MA:D.C. Heath; 1980:145-56.
17. Scouller K, Prosser M. Students' experiences in studying for multiple choice question examinations. Studies Higher Educ 1994;19:267-79.
18. Downing SM, Baranowski RA, Grosso LJ, Norcini JJ. Item type and cognitive ability measured: The validity evidence for multiple true-false items in medical specialty certification. Applied Meas Educ 1995;8:187-97.
19. Spencer JA, Jordan RK. Learner centred approaches in medical education. BMJ 1999;318:1280-3.
20. Case SM. The use of imprecise terms in examination questions: How frequent is frequently? Acad Med 1994;69 (10 Suppl):S4-S6.
21. Tarrant M, Ware J. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments. Med Educ 2008;42:198-206.
22. Rees PJ. Do medical students learn from multiple choice examinations? Med Educ 1986;20:123-5
23. Fenderson BA, Damjanov I, Robeson MR, Veloski JJ, Rubin E. The virtues of extended matching and uncued tests as alternatives to multiple choice questions. Hum Pathol 1997;28:526-32.
24. Swanson DB, Holtzman KZ, Allbee K, Clauser BE. Psychometric characteristics and response times for content-parallel extended-matching and one-best-answer items in relation to number of options. Acad Med 2006;81 (10 Suppl):S52-S55.
25. Duthie S, Fiander A, Hodges P. EMQs: A new component of the MRCOG Part 1 examination. Obstet Gynaecol 2007;9:189-94.
26. Swanson DB, Holtzman KZ, Clauser BE, Sawhill AJ. Psychometric characteristics and response times for one-best-answer questions in relation to number and source of options. Acad Med 2005;80 (10 Suppl):S93-S96.
27. Toolbox of assessment methods. Available at http://www.acgme.org/outcome/assess/toolbox.asp (accessed on 3 Sep 2008).
28. Case SM, Swanson DB, Ripkey DR. Comparison of items in five-option and extended-matching formats for assessment of diagnostic skills. Acad Med 1994;69 (10 Suppl):S1-S3.