Echocardiographic quantitative analysis of resting myocardial function for the assessment of viability after myocardial infarction - Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

Kardiologia Polska

Volumn 69, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 915-922

  Lipiec, Piotr ^a   Szymczyk, Ewa ^a   Michalski, Błazej ^a   Stefańczyk, Ludomir ^a   Woźniakowski, Bartłomiej ^a   Rotkiewicz, Arkadiusz ^a   Szymczyk, Konrad ^a   Kasprzak, Jarosław D ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF LODZ   (Poland)

Author keywords

Echocardiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardium; Viability

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AKINESIA; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DYSKINESIA; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART VENTRICLE WALL; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LATE ENHANCEMENT NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PEAK SYSTOLIC LONGITUDINAL STRAIN; PHYSICAL STRESS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESTING ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; SPECKLE TRACKING TECHNIQUE; SYSTOLIC LONGITUDINAL STRAIN RATE; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VISUAL VIABILITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 80053196123     PISSN: 00229032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Camici PG, Prasad SK, Rimoldi OE. Stunning, hibernation, and assessment of myocardial viability. Circulation, 2008; 117: 103-114. (Pubitemid 350301145)
2. Underwood SR, Bax JJ, vom Dahl J et al. Study Group of the European Society of Cardiology. Imaging techniques for the assessment of myocardial hibernation. Report of a Study Group of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2004; 25: 815-836. (Pubitemid 38684148)
3. Senior R. Diagnostic and imaging considerations: role of viability. Heart Fail Rev, 2006; 11: 125-134. (Pubitemid 44288727)
4. Schinkel AF, Bax JJ, Boersma E et al. Assessment of residual myocardial viability in regions with chronic electrocardiographic Q-wave infarction. Am Heart J, 2002; 144: 865-869. (Pubitemid 35335180)
5. Bijnens BH, Cikes M, Claus P, Sutherland GR. Velocity and deformation imaging for the assessment of myocardial dysfunction. Eur J Echocardiogr, 2009; 10: 216-226.
6. Heimdal A, Støylen A, Torp H, Skjaerpe T. Real-time strain rate imaging of the left ventricle by ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1998; 11: 1013-1019. (Pubitemid 28543484)
7. Perk G, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Non-Doppler two-dimensional strain imaging by echocardiography-from technical considerations to clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2007; 20: 234-243.
8. Migrino RQ, Zhu X, Pajewski N, Brahmbhatt T, Hoffmann R, Zhao M. Assessment of segmental myocardial viability using regional 2-dimensional strain echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2007; 20: 342-351. (Pubitemid 46497624)
9. Kylmälä MM, Antila MK, Kivistö SM, et al. Tissue Doppler strain-mapping in the assessment of the extent of chronic myocardial infarction: validation using magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr, 2008; 9: 678-684.
10. Park SM, Miyazaki C, Prasad A et al. Feasibility of prediction of myocardial viability with Doppler tissue imaging following percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2009; 22: 183-189.
11. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 1989; 2: 358-267.
12. Weidemann F, Dommke C, Bijnens B et al. Defining the transmurality of a chronic myocardial infarction by ultrasonic strain-rate imaging: implications for identifying intramural viability: an experimental study. Circulation, 2003; 107: 883-888. (Pubitemid 36241048)
13. Zhang Y, Chan AK, Yu CM et al. Strain rate imaging differentiates transmural from non-transmural myocardial infarction: a validation study using delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46: 864-871. (Pubitemid 41224812)
14. Hanekom L, Jenkins C, Jeffries L et al. Incremental value of strain rate analysis as an adjunct to wall-motion scoring for assessment of myocardial viability by dobutamine echocardiography: a follow-up study after revascularization. Circulation, 2005; 112: 3892-3900. (Pubitemid 43739487)
15. Lim P, Pasquet A, Gerber B et al. Is postsystolic shortening a marker of viability in chronic left ventricular ischemic dysfunction? Comparison with late enhancement contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2008; 21: 452-457.
16. Terkelsen CJ, Poulsen SH, Nørgaard BL et al. Does postsystolic motion or shortening predict recovery of myocardial function after primary percutanous coronary intervention? J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2007; 20: 505-511. (Pubitemid 46678677)
17. Hoffmann R, Altiok E, Nowak B et al. Strain rate analysis allows detection of differences in diastolic function between viable and nonviable myocardial segments. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2005; 18: 330-335. (Pubitemid 40470397)
18. Roes SD, Mollema SA, Lamb HJ, van der Wall EE, De Roos A, Bax JJ. Validation of echocardiographic two-dimensional speckle tracking longitudinal strain imaging for viability assessment in patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol, 2009; 104: 312-317.
19. Delgado V, Mollema SA, Ypenburg C et al. Relation between global left ventricular longitudinal strain assessed with novel automated function imaging and biplane left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2008; 21: 1244-1250.