Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 19, 2011, Pages 6379-6400

  Okamoto, R J ^a   Clayton, E H ^a   Bayly, P V ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; AXIAL VIBRATIONS; BOUNDARY EFFECTS; CLOSED FORM SOLUTIONS; DISPLACEMENT FIELD; ERROR METRICES; FITTING ERROR; FREQUENCY RANGES; HIGHER FREQUENCIES; INERTIAL EFFECT; LOCAL PARAMETERS; LOSS FACTOR; LOSS MODULI; LOW SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; LOWER FREQUENCIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ELASTOGRAPHY; MECHANICAL TESTS; NAVIER'S EQUATIONS; SHEAR TESTING; SHEAR TESTS; SOFT GELS; TEST METHOD; TISSUE-MIMICKING MATERIALS; TOTAL LEAST SQUARES; VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES; VISCOELASTIC SHEAR MODULI; WIDE FREQUENCY RANGE;

ESTIMATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SHEAR WAVES; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; TISSUE; VISCOELASTICITY;

SHEAR FLOW;

GELATIN; GLYCEROL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELASTICITY; ELASTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THEORETICAL MODEL; VIBRATION; VISCOSITY;

ANIMALS; ELASTICITY; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; GELATIN; GLYCEROL; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; SHEAR STRENGTH; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; STRESS, MECHANICAL; VIBRATION; VISCOSITY;

EID: 80053195726     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/19/014     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arbogast K B and Margulies S S 1998 Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests J. Biomech. 31 801-7 (Pubitemid 28474682)
2. Arbogast K B, Thibault K L, Pinheiro B S, Winey K I and Margulies S S 1997 A high-frequency shear device for testing soft biological tissues J. Biomech. 30 757-9 (Pubitemid 27309829)
3. Atay S M, Kroenke C D, Sabet A and Bayly P V 2008 Measurement of the dynamic shear modulus of mouse brain tissue in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography J. Biomech. Eng. 130 021013
4. Baumberger T, Caroli C and Martina D 2006 Solvent control of crack dynamics in a reversible hydrogel Nat. Mater. 5 552-5 (Pubitemid 43993077)
5. Bayly P V, Massouros P G, Christoforou E, Sabet A and Genin G M 2008 Magnetic resonance measurement of transient shear wave propagation in a viscoelastic gel cylinder J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56 2036-49
6. Berry D S 1958 Stress propagation in visco-elastic bodies J. Mech. Phys. Solids 6 177-85
7. Chan Q C, Li G, Ehman R L, Grimm R C, Li R and Yang E S 2006 Needle shear wave driver for magnetic resonance elastography Magn. Reson. Med. 55 1175-9
8. Chen Q, Ringleb S I, Hulshizer T and An K N 2005 Identification of the testing parameters in high frequency dynamic shear measurement on agarose gels J. Biomech. 38 959-63 (Pubitemid 40253543)
9. Clayton E H, Garbow J R and Bayly P V 2011 Frequency-dependent viscoelastic parameters of mouse brain tissue estimated by MR elastography Phys. Med. Biol. 56 2391-406
10. Doyley M M, Feng Q, Weaver J B and Paulsen K D 2007 Performance analysis of steady-state harmonic elastography Phys. Med. Biol. 52 2657-74
11. Doyley M M, Perreard I, Patterson A J, Weaver J B and Paulsen K M 2010 The performance of steady-state harmonic magnetic resonance elastography when applied to viscoelastic materials Med. Phys. 37 3970-9
12. Doyley M M, Weaver J B, Van Houten E E, Kennedy F E and Paulsen K D 2003 Thresholds for detecting and characterizing focal lesions using steady-state MR elastography Med. Phys. 30 495-504 (Pubitemid 36443953)
13. Golub G H and Van Loan C F 1980 An analysis of the total least-squares problem SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 17 883-93
14. Green M A, Bilston L E and Sinkus R 2008 In vivo brain viscoelastic properties measured by magnetic resonance elastography NMR Biomed. 21 755-64
15. Hall T J, Bilgen M, Insana M F and Krouskop T A 1997 Phantom materials for elastography IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Control 44 1355-65 (Pubitemid 127771330)
16. Hamhaber U, Grieshaber F A, Nagel J H and Klose U 2003 Comparison of quantitative shear wave MR-elastography with mechanical compression tests Magn. Reson. Med. 49 71-7 (Pubitemid 36042335)
17. Henni A H, Schmitt C and Cloutier G 2010 Shear wave induced resonance elastography of soft heterogeneous media J. Biomech. 43 1488-93
18. Hrapko M, van Dommelen J A, Peters G W and Wismans J S 2008 Characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue in compression and shear Biorheology 45 663-76
19. Joly-Duhamel C C 2002 All gelatin networks: II. The master curve for elasticity Langmuir 18 7158-66
20. Klatt D, Friedrich C, Korth Y, Vogt R, Braun J and Sack I 2010a Viscoelastic properties of liver measured by oscillatory rheometry and multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography Biorheology 47 133-41
21. Klatt D, Hamhaber U, Asbach P, Braun J and Sack I 2007 Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity Phys. Med. Biol. 52 7281-94 (Pubitemid 350242840)
22. Klatt D, Papazoglou S, Braun J and Sack I 2010b Viscoelasticity-based MR elastography of skeletal muscle Phys. Med. Biol. 55 6445-59
23. Koeller R C 1984 Applications of fractional calculus to the theory of viscoelasticity J. Appl. Mech. 51 299-307 (Pubitemid 14583151)
24. Kohandel M, Sivaloganathan S, Tenti G and Darvish K 2005 Frequency dependence of complex moduli of brain tissue using a fractional Zener model Phys. Med. Biol. 50 2799-805 (Pubitemid 40771012)
25. Madsen E L, Frank G R, Hobson M A, Lin-Gibson S, Hall T J, Jiang J and Stiles T A 2008 Instrument for determining the complex shear modulus of soft-tissue-like materials from 10 to 300 Hz Phys. Med. Biol. 53 5313-42
26. Mendenhall 1983 Introduction to Probability and Statistics (Boston, MA: Duxbury Press)
27. Muthupillai R, Lomas D J, Rossman P J, Greenleaf J F, Manduca A and Ehman R L 1995 Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves Science 269 1854-7
28. Nixon J D, Georgakapoulos P P and Carless J E 1966 The rigidity of gelatin-glycerin gels J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 18 283-8
29. Oudry J, Vappou J, Choquet P, Willinger R, Sandrin L and Constantinesco A 2009 Ultrasound-based transient elastography compared to magnetic resonance elastography in soft tissue-mimicking gels Phys. Med. Biol. 54 6979-90
30. Papazoglou S, Hamhaber U, Braun J and Sack I 2008 Algebraic Helmholtz inversion in planar magnetic resonance elastography Phys. Med. Biol. 53 3147-58 (Pubitemid 351892392)
31. Pattison A J, Lollis S S, Perrinez P R, Perreard I M, McGarry M D, Weaver J B and Paulsen K D 2010 Time-harmonic magnetic resonance elastography of the normal feline brain J. Biomech. 43 2747-52
32. Perreard I M, Pattison A J, Doyley M, McGarry M D, Barani Z, Van Houten E E, Weaver J B and Paulsen K D 2010 Effects of frequency- and direction-dependent elastic materials on linearly elastic MRE image reconstructions Phys. Med. Biol. 55 6801-15
33. Plewes D B, Bishop J, Samani A and Sciarretta J 2000 Visualization and quantification of breast cancer biomechanical properties with magnetic resonance elastography Phys. Med. Biol. 45 1591-610 (Pubitemid 30408921)
34. Riek K, Klatt D, Nuzha H, Mueller S, Neumann U, Sack I and Braun J 2011 Wide-range dynamic magnetic resonance elastography J. Biomech. 44 1380-6
35. Ringleb S I, Chen Q, Lake D S, Manduca A, Ehman R L and An K N 2005 Quantitative shear wave magnetic resonance elastography: comparison to a dynamic shear material test Magn. Reson. Med. 53 1197-201 (Pubitemid 40627799)
36. Sack I, Beierbach B, Wuerfel J, Klatt D, Hamhaber U, Papazoglou S, Martus P and Braun J 2009 The impact of aging and gender on brain viscoelasticity Neuroimage 46 652-7
37. Shuck L Z and Advani S H 1972 Rheological response of human brain-tissue in shear J. Basic Eng. 94 905-11
38. Sinkus R, Siegmann K, Xydeas T, Tanter M, Claussen C and Fink M 2007 MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography Magn. Reson. Med. 58 1135-44 (Pubitemid 350234200)
39. Sinkus R, Tanter M, Xydeas T, Catheline S, Bercoff J and Fink M 2005 Viscoelastic shear properties of in vivo breast lesions measured by MR elastography Magn. Reson. Imaging 23 159-65
40. Streitberger K J, Wiener E, Hoffmann J, Freimann F B, Klatt D, Braun J, Lin K, McLaughlin J, Sprung C, Klingebiel R and Sack I 2011 In vivo viscoelastic properties of the brain in normal pressure hydrocephalus NMR Biomed. 24 385-92
41. Tschoegl N W 1989 The Phenomenological Theory of Linear Viscoelastic Behavior: An Introduction (New York: Springer)
42. Vappou J, Breton E, Choquet P, Goetz C, Willinger R and Constantinesco A 2007 Magnetic resonance elastography compared with rotational rheometry for in vitro brain tissue viscoelasticity measurement Magma 20 273-8
43. Wuerfel J, Paul F, Beierbach B, Hamhaber U, Klatt D, Papazoglou S, Zipp F, Martus P, Braun J and Sack I 2010 MR-elastography reveals degradation of tissue integrity in multiple sclerosis Neuroimage 49 2520-5