Towards modeling guidelines for capturing the cost of improving software product quality in release planning

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 20-23

  Svensson, Richard Berntsson ^a   Regnell, Björn ^a   Aurum, Aybuke ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

empirical; quality requirements; QUPER; release planning

Indexed keywords

COST ESTIMATIONS; EMPIRICAL; ESTIMATED COSTS; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; MODELING APPROACH; PRODUCT ENHANCEMENTS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY PERFORMANCE; QUALITY REQUIREMENTS; QUALITY TARGETS; QUPER; RELEASE PLANNING; SOFTWARE FUNCTIONS; SOFTWARE PRODUCT QUALITY; SOFTWARE QUALITY; SYSTEM QUALITY; TARGET QUALITY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; COSTS; INVESTMENTS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 80053193222     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1961258.1961263     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Barney, S., Aurum, A., and Wohlin, C. 2008. A product management challenge: Creating software product value through requirements selection. Journal of Systems Architecture 54(Jun. 2008), 576-593.
2. th International Working Conference on Requiremetns Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (Amsterdam, Netherlands, June 08-09, 2009). REFSQ'09. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 218-232.
3. nd International Workshop on Software Product Management (Barcelona, Spain, September 09, 2008). IWSPM'08. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ.
4. thInternational Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (London, UK, September 04-08, 2000). IEEE Comput. Soc, USA, 961-965.
5. Gilb, T. 2005. Competitive Engineering. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
6. Greer, D, and Ruhe, G. 2004. Software release planning: an evolutionary and iterative approach. Information and Software Technology 46(Mar. 2004), 243-253.
7. Kano, N., Nobuhiro, S., Takahashi, S., and Tsuji, S. 1984. Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu 14, 39-48.
8. Karlsson, J., and Ryan, K. 1997. A cost-value approach for prioritizing requirements. IEEE Software 14(Sep-Oct. 1997), 67-74. (Pubitemid 127554991)
9. Pfleeger, S.L. 1999. Understanding and improving technology transfer in software engineering. Journal of Systems and Software 47(Jul. 1999), 111-124.
10. Regnell, B., Berntsson Svensson, R., and Olsson, T. 2008. Supporting Roadmapping of Quality Requirements. IEEE Software 25(Mar-Apr. 2008), 42-47. (Pubitemid 351404574)
11. th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (Trondheim, Norway, June 11-12, 2007). REFSQ'07. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 277-291.
12. Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research. Blackwell, Oxford.
13. Saaty, T. 1980. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.
14. Ullah, M.I., and Ruhe, G. 2006. Towards Comprehensive Release Planning for Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Product Management (Minneapolis, USA, September 12, 2006). IWSPM. Inst. of Elec. and Elec. Eng. Computer Society, USA, 51-55.
15. van den Akker, M., Brinkkemper, S., Diepen, G., and Versendaal J. 2008. Software Product Release Planning through Optimization and What-if Analysis. Information and Software Technology 50(Jan. 2008), 101-111. (Pubitemid 350192219)