Quid pro quo? Reciprocal self-disclosure and communicative accomodation towards a virtual interviewer

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6895 LNAI, Issue , 2011, Pages 183-194

  Von Der Pütten, Astrid M ^a   Hoffmann, Laura ^a   Klatt, Jennifer ^a   Krämer, Nicole C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

communication adaptation theory; ECA; experimental study; linguistic alignment; reciprocal self disclosure; social effects; virtual agent

Indexed keywords

ACCOMODATIONS; CO-PRESENCE; ECA; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; RECIPROCAL SELF-DISCLOSURE; SELF-DISCLOSURE; VIRTUAL AGENT;

INTELLIGENT VIRTUAL AGENTS; SPEECH;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 80053187052     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Cassell, J., Miller, P.: Is it Self-Administration if the Computer Gives you Encouraging Looks? In: Conrad, F.G., Schober, M.F. (eds.) Envisioning the Survey Interview of the Future, pp. 161-178. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2007)
2. Freeman, J., Butler, E.W.: Some Sources of Interviewer Variance in Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 40(1), 79-91 (1976), doi:10.1086/268269
3. Weisband, S., Kiesler, S.: Self-disclosure on computer forms: meta-analysis and implications. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground, pp. 3-10. ACM, Vancouver (1996)
4. Durant, L.E., Carey, M.P.: Self-Administered Questionnaires versus Face-to-Face Interviews in Assessing Sexual Behavior in Young Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior 29(4), 309-322 (2000), doi:10.1023/A:1001930202526
5. Moon, Y.: Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self Disclosure From Consumers. Journal of Consumer Research 26(4), 323-339 (2000), doi:10.1086/209566
6. Cialdini, R.B.: Influence: Science and practice, 3rd edn. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York (1993)
7. Ehrlich, H.J., Graeven, D.B.: Reciprocal self-disclosure in a dyad. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7(4), 389-400 (1971), doi:10.1016/0022-1031(71)90073-4
8. Joinson, A.N.: Knowing Me, Knowing You: Reciprocal Self-Disclosure in Internet-Based Surveys. CyberPsychology & Behavior 4(5), 587-591 (2001)
9. Von der Pütten, A.M., Krämer, N.C., Gratch, J., Kang, S.: "It doesn't matter what you are!"Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6), 1641-1650 (2010), doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.012
10. Kang, S.-H., Gratch, J.: Virtual humans elicit socially anxious interactants' verbal self-disclosure. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 21(3) (2010), doi:10.1002/cav.345
11. Gong, L., Nass, C.: When a Talking-Face Computer Agent is Half-Human and Half-Humanoid: Human Identity and Consistency Preference. Human Communication Research 33(2), 163-193 (2007), doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00295.x
12. Giles, H., Coupland, N.: Language: Contexts and Consequences. Brooks/Cole, Monterey (1991)
13. Burgoon, J.K., Dillman, L., Stem, L.A.: Adaptation in Dyadic Interaction: Defining and Operationalizing Patterns of Reciprocity and Compensation. Communication Theory 3(4), 295-316 (1993), doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00076. x
14. Bilous, F., Krauss, R.M.: Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behavior of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication 8, 183-194 (1988)
15. Gnisci, A., Bakeman, R.: Sequential Accommodation of Turn Taking and Turn Length: A Study of Courtroom Interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26(3), 234-259 (2007), doi:10.1177/0261927X06303474
16. Krämer, N.C., Sommer, N., Kopp, S., Becker-Asano, C.: Smile and the world will smile with you - The effects of a virtual agent's smile on users' evaluation and non-conscious behavioural mimicry. Paper presented at ICA 2009 Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago, USA (2009)
17. Garrod, S., Pickering, M.J.: Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(1), 8-11 (2004), doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016
18. Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., Pearson, J., McLean, J.F.: Linguistic alignment between people and computers. Journal of Pragmatics 42(9), 2355-2368 (2010), doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.012
19. Nowak, K.L., Biocca, F.: The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users' Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12(5), 481-494 (2003), doi:10.1162/105474603322761289
20. Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F.: NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrae (NEO-FFI), 2nd edn. Hogrefe, Göttingen (2008)
21. Miller, L.C., Berg, J.H., Archer, R.L.: Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44(6), 1234-1244 (1983), doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1234
22. Bickmore, T., Schulman, D., Yin, L.: Engagement vs. Deceit: Virtual Humans with Human Autobiographies. In: Ruttkay, Z., Kipp, M., Nijholt, A., Vilhjálmsson, H.H. (eds.) IVA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5773, pp. 6-19. Springer, Heidelberg (2009), doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04380-2-4