Patient activation and functional recovery in persons undergoing spine surgery

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 93, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 1665-1671

  Skolasky, Richard L ^a   Mackenzie, Ellen J ^a   Wegener, Stephen T ^a   Riley III, Lee H ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHRODESIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MENTAL HEALTH; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT FORM 12; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINE SURGERY;

EID: 80053184825     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00855     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Davis H. Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979-1990. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19:1117-24.
2. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30: 1441-7.
3. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES. United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2707-14.
4. Junge A, Fröhlich M, Ahrens S, Hasenbring M, Sandler A, Grob D, Dvorák J. Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years' follow up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21: 1056-65.
5. Dvorak J, Gauchat MH, Valach L. The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. I. A 4-17 years' follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13:1418-22.
6. Hibbard JH, Stockard J, Mahoney ER, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004;39:1005-26. (Pubitemid 38924690)
7. Rovner BW, Folstein MF. Mini-mental state exam in clinical practice. Hosp Pract (Off Ed). 1987;22:99, 103, 6, 10.
8. Eichholz KM, Ryken TC. Complications of revision spinal surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15:E1-E4.
9. Skolasky RL, Mackenzie EJ, Wegener ST, Riley LH 3rd. Patient activation and adherence to physical therapy in persons undergoing spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:E784-E91.
10. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6 Pt 1): 1918-30. (Pubitemid 41814242)
11. Skolasky RL, Mackenzie EJ, Riley LH 3rd, Wegener ST. Psychometric properties of the Patient Activation Measure among individuals presenting for elective lumbar spine surgery. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:1357-66.
12. Hibbard JH, Greene J, Tusler M. Improving the outcomes of disease management by tailoring care to the patient's level of activation. Am J Manag Care. 2009; 15:353-60.
13. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613-9.
14. O'Connell RL, Lim LL. Utility of the Charlson comorbidity index computed from routinely collected hospital discharge diagnosis codes. Methods Inf Med. 2000; 39:7-11. (Pubitemid 30196270)
15. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978;37:378-81. (Pubitemid 9017965)
16. Breivik EK, Björnsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain. 2000;16:22-8. (Pubitemid 30155392)
17. Flaherty SA. Pain measurement tools for clinical practice and research. AANA J. 1996;64:133-40.
18. Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VW. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain. 2005;117:412-20. (Pubitemid 41383536)
19. Herr KA, Spratt K, Mobily PR, Richardson G. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:207-19. (Pubitemid 38802807)
20. Fairbank J. Use of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20:1535-6.
21. Hurst NP, Ruta DA, Kind P. Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37:862-9.
22. Weisberg S. Applied linear regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1985.
23. Hibbard JH, Cunningham PJ. How engaged are consumers in their health and health care, and why does it matter? Res Briefs. 2008;8:1-9.
24. Mosen DM, Schmittdiel J, Hibbard J, Sobel D, Remmers C, Bellows J. Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manage. 2007;30:21-9. (Pubitemid 46005839)
25. Kortte KB, Falk LD, Castillo RC, Johnson-Greene D, Wegener ST. The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale: development and psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:877-84. (Pubitemid 46963219)
26. Alegría M, Polo A, Gao S, Santana L, Rothstein D, Jimenez A, Hunter ML, Mendieta F, Oddo V, Normand SL. Evaluation of a patient activation and empowerment intervention in mental health care. Med Care. 2008;46:247-56.
27. Morisky DE, Bowler MH, Finlay JS. An educational and behavioral approach toward increasing patient activation in hypertension management. J Community Health. 1982;7:171-82. (Pubitemid 12157324)
28. Williams GC, McGregor H, Zeldman A, Freedman ZR, Deci EL, Elder D. Promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management: evaluating a patient activation intervention. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;56:28-34. (Pubitemid 39601715)
29. Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stock R, Tusler M. Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors? Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1443-63. (Pubitemid 47024845)