A response to Sestini's (2011) response

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1004-1005

  Goldenberg, Maya J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; NOTE; PHILOSOPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENCE; THEORY;

EID: 80053181299     PISSN: 13561294     EISSN: 13652753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01737.x     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Sestini, P., (2010) Epistemology and ethics of evidence-based medicine. Putting goal-setting in the right place. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16 (2), 301-305.
2. Goldenberg, M. J., (2010) From Popperian science to normal science. Commentary on Sestini (2009) 'Epistemology and ethics of evidence-based medicine'. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16 (2), 306-309.
3. Sestini, P., (2011) Epistemelogy and ethics of evidence-based medicine: A response to comments. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17 (5), 1002-1003.
4. Popper, K. R., (2002) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
5. Godfrey-Smith, P., (2003) Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Loewy, E., (2007) Ethics and evidence-based medicine: is there a conflict? MedGenMed, 9 (3), 30.