Estimating the probability of local crime clusters: The impact of immediate spatial neighbors

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 394-404

  Andresen, Martin A ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053180325     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Andresen M.A. Crime measures and the spatial analysis of criminal activity. British Journal of Criminology 2006, 46:258-285.
2. Andresen M.A., Boyd N.T. A cost - benefit and cost - effectiveness analysis of Vancouver's supervised injection facility. International Journal of Drug Policy 2010, 21:70-76.
3. Anselin L. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models 1988, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
4. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association - LISA. Geographical Analysis 1995, 27:93-115.
5. Anselin L., Cohen J., Cook D., Gorr W., Tita G. Spatial analyses of crime. Criminal justice 2000, volume 4, measurement and analysis of crime and justice 2000, 213-262. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC. D. Dufee (Ed.).
6. Anselin L., Syabri I., Kho Y. GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical Analysis 2006, 38:5-22.
7. Baller R.D., Anselin L., Messner S.F., Deane G., Hawkins D.F. Structural covariates of U.S. county homicide rates: incorporating spatial effects. Criminology 2001, 39:561-590.
8. Baller R.D., Richardson K.K. Social integration, imitation, and the geographic patterning of suicide. American Sociological Review 2002, 67:873-888.
9. Brantingham P.L., Brantingham P.J. Residential burglary and urban form. Urban Studies 1975, 12:273-284.
10. Brantingham P.L., Brantingham P.J. A topological technique for regionalization. Environment and Behavior 1978, 10:335-353.
11. Brantingham P.L., Brantingham P.J. Paths, nodes and edges: considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1993, 13:3-28.
12. Cahill M.E., Mulligan G.F. The determinants of crime in Tucson, Arizona. Urban Geography 2003, 24:582-610.
13. Cohen L.E., Felson M. Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 1979, 44:588-608.
14. Cohen J., Tita G. Diffusion in homicide: exploring a general method for detecting spatial diffusion processes. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1999, 15:451-493.
15. Crime prevention studies, volume 4, crime and place 1995, Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY. J.E. Eck, D. Weisburd (Eds.).
16. Fisher B.S., Wilkes A.R.P. A tale of two ivory towers: a comparative analysis of victimization rates and risks between university students in the United States and England. British Journal of Criminology 2003, 43:526-545.
17. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., Charlton M. Quantitative geography: perspectives on spatial data analysis 2000, Sage Publications, London, UK.
18. Fotheringham A.S., Brunsdon C., Charlton M. Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships 2002, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
19. Fotheringham A.S., Wong D.W. The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A 1991, 23:1025-1044.
20. Gottfredson D.C., Mcneil R.J., Gottfredson G.D. Social area influences on delinquency: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1991, 28:197-226.
21. Greene W.H. Econometric analysis 2000, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 4th ed.
22. Griffiths E., Chavez J.M. Communities, street guns and homicide trajectories in Chicago, 1980-1995: merging methods for examining trends across space and time. Criminology 2004, 42:941-978.
23. Guerry A. Essai sur la statistique morale de la France 1833, Crochard, Paris.
24. Haining R., Law J. Combining police perceptions with police records of serious crime areas: a modelling approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 2007, 170:1019-1034.
25. Hipp J.R. Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review 2007, 72:659-680.
26. Hirschi T., Gottfredson M. Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology 1983, 89:552-584.
27. Kennedy P. A guide to econometrics 2003, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA. 5th ed.
28. Kennedy L.W., Forde D.R. Routine activities and crime: an analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology 1990, 28:137-152.
29. Kinney J.B., Brantingham P.L., Wuschke K., Kirk M.G., Brantingham P.J. Crime attractors, generators and detractors: land use and urban crime opportunities. Built Environment 2008, 34:62-74.
30. Law J., Haining R. A Bayesian approach to modeling binary data: the case of high-intensity crime areas. Geographical Analysis 2004, 36:197-216.
31. Linsky A., Straus M. Social stress in the United States: links to regional patterns in crime and illness 1986, Auburn House, Dover, MA.
32. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in econometrics 1974, 105-142. Academic Press, New York, NY. P. Zarembka (Ed.).
33. McFadden D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Structural analysis of discrete data using econometric applications 1981, 198-272. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. C.F. Manski, D. McFadden (Eds.).
34. Messner S.F., Anselin L., Baller R.D., Hawkins D.F., Deane G., Tolnay S.E. The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: an application of exploratory spatial data analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1999, 15:423-450.
35. Miyamoto, K., Shimomura, N., & Vichiensan, V. (2003). A discrete choice model with structuralized spatial effects for land-use analysis. Mimeo.
36. Morenoff J.D., Sampson R.J., Raudenbush S.W. Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology 2001, 39:517-559.
37. Newman O. Defensible space: crime prevention through urban design 1972, Macmillan, New York, NY.
38. Openshaw S. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. CATMOG (Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography) 1984, 38. Geo Books, Norwich.
39. Openshaw S. Ecological fallacies and the analysis of areal census data. Environment and Planning A 1984, 16:17-31.
40. Quetelet A. A treatise on man 1842, William and Robert Chambers, Edinburgh.
41. Ratcliffe J.H. On the accuracy of TIGER type geocoded address data in relation to cadastral and census areal units. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2001, 15:473-485.
42. Ratcliffe J.H. Geocoding crime and a first estimate of a minimum acceptable hit rate. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2004, 18:61-72.
43. Ratcliffe J.H., McCullagh M.J. Hotbeds of crime and the search for spatial accuracy. Journal of Geographical Systems 1999, 1:385-398.
44. Rice K.J., Smith W.R. Socioecological models of automotive theft: integrating routine activity and social disorganization approaches. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2002, 39:304-336.
45. Sampson R.J., Groves W.B. Community structure and crime: testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology 1989, 94:774-802.
46. Sampson R.J., Morenoff J.D., Earls F. Beyond social capital: spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review 1999, 64:633-660.
47. Sampson R.J., Raudenbush S.W., Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997, 277:918-924.
48. Sampson R.J., Wooldredge J.D. Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1987, 3:371-393.
49. Shaw C.R. Delinquency areas 1929, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
50. Shaw C.R., McKay H.D. Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: a study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities 1942, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
51. Sherman L.W., Gartin P.R., Buerger M.E. Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 1989, 27:27-56.
52. Simcha-Fagan O., Schwartz J.E. Neighborhood and delinquency: an assessment of contextual effects. Criminology 1986, 27:27-55.
53. Smith W.R., Frazee S.G., Davison E.L. Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology 2000, 38:489-523.
54. Stark R. Deviant places: a theory of the ecology of crime. Readings in contemporary criminological theory 1996, 128-142. Northeastern University Press, Boston, MA. P. Cordella, L.J. Seigel (Eds.).
55. Tseloni A., Osborn D.R., Trickett A., Pease K. Modelling property crime using the British Crime Survey: what have we learnt?. British Journal of Criminology 2002, 42:109-128.
56. Tseloni A., Wittebrood K., Farrell G., Pease K. Burglary victimization in England and Wales, the United States and the Netherlands. British Journal of Criminology 2004, 44:66-91.
57. Weisburd D., Bruinsma G.J.N., Bernasco W. Units of analysis in geographic criminology: historical development, critical issues, and open questions. Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in geographic criminology 2009, 3-31. Springer, New York, NY. D. Weisburd, W. Bernasco, G.J.N. Bruinsma (Eds.).
58. Weisburd D., Bushway S., Lum C., Yang S. Trajectories of crime at places: a longitudinal study of street segments in the City of Seattle. Criminology 2004, 42:283-321.
59. Wong D.W.S. Aggregation effects in geo-referenced data. Practical handbook of spatial statistics 1996, 83-106. CRC Press, New York, NY. S.L. Arlinghaus (Ed.).
60. Wooldredge J. Examining the (ir)relevance of aggregation for multilevel studies of neighborhoods and crime with an example comparing census tracts to official neighborhoods in Cincinnati. Criminology 2002, 40:681-709.
61. Wooldridge J.M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.