Biomass expansion factor and root-to-shoot ratio for Pinus in Brazil

Carbon Balance and Management

Volumn 6, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Sanquetta, Carlos R ^a,b   Corte, Ana P D ^b,c   Da Silva, Fernando ^b,d  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^b Forestry Research Foundation of Paraná ^*  (Brazil)

^c Forestry Research Foundation of Paraná   (Brazil)

^d INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS DA AMAZÔNIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Allometry; Carbon; CDM; Modeling; Regression

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CONIFEROUS TREE; FOREST INVENTORY; GROWTH RATE; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; PHYTOMASS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROOT-SHOOT RATIO;

BRAZIL;

EID: 80053173359     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17500680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1750-0680-6-6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Somogyi Z, Cienciala E, Makipaa R, Muukkonen P, Lehtonen A, Weiss P. Indirect methods of large-scale forest biomass estimation. European Journal of Forest Research 2006, 126(2):197-207.
2. Sanquetta CR, Corte APD, Balbinot R, Zilliotto MAB. Proposta metodológica para quantificação e monitoramento do carbono estocado em florestas plantadas. Mercado de carbono: mercado e ciência 2006, 1:120-150. Curitiba: UFPR, Carlos Roberto Sanquetta, Marco Aurélio Zilliotto.
3. Johnson WC, Sharpe DM. The ratio of total to merchantable forest biomass and its application to the global carbon budget. Can J For Res 1983, 13:372-383.
4. Karjalainen T, Kellomäki S. Greenhouse gas inventory for land use changes and forestry in Finland based on international guidelines. Mitigation Adapt Strategies Global Climate 1996, n. 1:51-71.
5. Weiss P, Schieler K, Schadauer K, Radunsky K, Englisch M. Die Kohlenstoffbilanz des österreichischen Waldes und Betrachtungen zum Kyoto-Protokoll. Series Die Kohlenstoffbilanz des österreichischen Waldes und Betrachtungen zum Kyoto-Protokoll 2000, Federal Environment Agency, Wien.
6. Kauppi PE, Mielikäinen K, Kuusela K. Biomass and carbon budget of European forests, 1971-1990. Science 1992, 256:70-74. 10.1126/science.256.5053.70, 17802594.
7. Kauppi PE, Kauppi E, Tomppo E, Ferm A. C and N storage in living trees within Finland since 1950s. Plant Soil 1995, 168/169:633-638.
8. Löwe H, Seufert G, Raes F. Comparison of methods used within member states for estimating CO2 emissions and sinks according to UNFCCC and EU monitoring mechanism: forest and other wooded land. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 2000, 4:315-319.
9. UN-ECE/FAO Forest Resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand (industrialized temperate/boreal countries). UN-ECE/FAO Contribution to the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 2000, Main Report United Nations, New York, Geneva, 2000 UN-ECE/FAO, UN-ECE/FAO.
10. FAO Global Forest Resource Assessment 2000 2001, FAO Forestry Paper 140. FAO, Rome, FAO.
11. IPCC pIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 2006, IPCC., http://www.ipcc.ch
12. Satoo T, Madgwick HAI. Forest biomass. Forestry Sciences 1982, 152. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publisher, The Hague.
13. Bartelink HH. Allometric relationships for biomass and leaf area of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ann For Sci 1997, 54:39-50.
14. Ter-Mikaelian MT, Korzukhin MD. Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. For Ecol Manage 1997, 97:1-24.
15. Lehtonen A, Mäkipää R, Heikkinen J, Sievänen R, Liski J. Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2004, 188(1(3)):211-224.
16. Levy PE, Hale SE, Nicoli BC. Biomass expansion factors and root: shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain. Forestry 2010, 77(5):421-430.
17. Liski J, Perruchoud D, Karjalainen T. Increasing carbon stocks in the forest soils of Western Europe. For Ecol Manage 2002, 169:163-179.
18. Schroeder P, Brown S, Mo J, Birdsey R, Cieszewski C. Biomass estimation for temperate broadleaf forests of the United States using inventory data. For Sci 1997, 43:424-434.
19. Brown SL, Schroeder PE. Spatial patterns of aboveground production and mortality of woody biomass for Eastern US forests. Ecol Applicat 1999, 9:968-980.
20. Brown S. Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environ Pollut 2002, 116:363-372. 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00212-3, 11822714.
21. Fukuda M, Iehara T, Matsumoto M. Carbon stock estimates for sugi and hinoki forests in Japan. For Ecol Manage 2003, 184:1-16.
22. Ishii H, Mcdowell NG. The role of epicormic branches in crown development of old Douglas-fir trees. Forest Ecology and Management 2002, 3(169):257-270.
23. Binkley D, Stape JL, Ryan MG, Barnard H, Fownes J. Age-related decline in forest ecosystem growth: an individual-tree, stand-structure hypothesis. Ecosystems 2002, 5:58-67.
24. Vanninen P, Ylitalo H, Sievanen R, Makela A. Effects of age and site quality on the distribution of biomass in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Trees - Structure and function 1996, 10(4):231-238.
25. Mäkelä AA. Carbon balance model of growth and self-pruning in trees based on structural relationships. Forest Science 1997, 1(43):7-24.
26. Li MH, Krauchi N, Dobbertin M. Biomass distribution of different-aged needles in young and old Pinus cembra trees at highland and lowland sites. Trees - Structure and function 2006, 10(5):611-618.
27. Nutto L, Spathelf P. Modelagem da desrama natural de Araucaria angustifolia (BERT.) O. KTZE. Revista Floresta 2003, 3(33):295-309.
28. Ruel J, Aires M. Jensen's inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. Tree 1999, 14(9).
29. Rastetter EB, Mckane RB, Shaver GR, Melillo JM. Changes in C storage by terrestrial ecosystems: how C-N interactions restrict responses to CO2 and temperature. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 1992, (64):327-344.
30. Magnani F, Mencuccini M, Grace J. Age-related decline in stand productivity: the role of structural acclimation under hydraulic constraints. Plant Cell Environ 2000, 23:251-263.
31. Kira T, Shidei R. Primary production and turnover of organic matter in different forest ecosystems of the western Pacific. Japanese Journal of Ecology 1967, 17(1):70-87.
32. Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton SR, Spurr SH. Forest Ecology. 1998, 792. Wiley, New York, 4.
33. Ryan MG, Binkley D, Fownes JH, Giardina CP, Senock RS. An experimental test of the causes of forest growth decline with stand age. Ecological Monographs 2004, 74(3):393-414.
34. Ryan M, Phillips N, Bond BJ. The hydraulic limitation hypothesis revisited. Plant, Cell and Environment 2006, 29:367-381. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01478.x, 17080592.
35. Soares P, Tomé M. Analysis of the effectiveness of biomass expansion factors to estimate stand biomass. Modeling Forest Production 2004, 368-374. Proc. Conf. Vienna, 19-21 April (Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, BOKU University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Hasenauer H, Makela A.
36. FAO State of the world's forests 1997 1997, 200. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, FAO.
37. Oliveira EB. Um sistema computadorizado de prognose do crescimento e produção de Pinus taeda L., com critérios quantitativos para avaliação técnica e econômica de regimes de manejo 1995, 134. (Tese - Doutorado em Ciências Florestais) - Setor de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba.
38. Sette JRCR, Nakajima NY, Geromini MP. Captura de carbono orgânico em povoamentos de Pinus taeda L. na região de Rio Negrinho, SC. Revista Floresta 2006, 36(1):33-44. Curitiba.