Goldstone fermion dark matter

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2011, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

  Bellazzini, Brando ^a   Csáki, Csaba ^a   Hubisz, Jay ^b   Shao, Jing ^b   Tanedo, Philip ^a  

^a School of Operations Research and Industrial Engineering   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond standard model; Cosmology of theories beyond the SM; Supersymmetric effective theories; Supersymmetric standard model

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053151132     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2011)035     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. D. Larson et al., Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: power spectra and WMAP-derived parameters, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192 (2011) 16 [arXiv:1001.4635] [SPIRES].
2. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [SPIRES].
3. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 100 live days of XENON100 data, arXiv:1104.2549 [SPIRES].
4. M. Farina et al., Implications of XENON100 and LHC results for dark matter models, arXiv:1104.3572 [SPIRES].
5. K. Griest and D. Seckel, Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3191 [SPIRES].
6. N. Arkani-Hamed, A. Delgado and G.F. Giudice, The well-tempered neutralino, Nucl. Phys. B 741 (2006) 108 [hep-ph/0601041] [SPIRES].
7. K. Tamvakis and D. Wyler, Broken global symmetries in supersymmetric theories, Phys. Lett. B 112 (1982) 451 [SPIRES].
8. J.F. Nieves, Spontaneous breaking of global symmetries in supersymmetric theories, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 1762 [SPIRES].
9. E.J. Chun and A. Lukas, Axino mass in supergravity models, Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 43 [hep-ph/9503233] [SPIRES].
10. T. Goto and M. Yamaguchi, Is axino dark matter possible in supergravity?, Phys. Lett. B 276 (1992) 103 [SPIRES].
11. H.P. Nilles and S. Raby, Supersymmetry and the strong CP problem, Nucl. Phys. B 198 (1982) 102 [SPIRES].
12. E.J. Chun, J.E. Kim and H.P. Nilles, Axino mass, Phys. Lett. B 287 (1992) 123 [hep-ph/9205229] [SPIRES].
13. T. Higaki and R. Kitano, On supersymmetric effective theories of axion, arXiv:1104.0170 [SPIRES].
14. K. Rajagopal, M.S. Turner and F. Wilczek, Cosmological implications of axinos, Nucl. Phys. B 358 (1991) 447 [SPIRES].
15. L. Covi, J.E. Kim and L. Roszkowski, Axinos as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 4180 [hep-ph/9905212] [SPIRES].
16. L. Covi, H.-B. Kim, J.E. Kim and L. Roszkowski, Axinos as dark matter, JHEP 05 (2001) 033 [hep-ph/0101009] [SPIRES].
17. R.N. Mohapatra and A. Riotto, TeV scale theory for cold and hot dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 1324 [hep-ph/9403275] [SPIRES].
18. P. Draper, T. Liu, C.E.M. Wagner, L.-T. Wang and H. Zhang, Dark light Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 121805 [arXiv:1009.3963] [SPIRES].
19. S.Y. Choi, D.J. Miller, 2 and P.M. Zerwas, The neutralino sector of the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 711 (2005) 83 [hep-ph/0407209] [SPIRES].
20. J.F. Gunion, D. Hooper and B. McElrath, Light neutralino dark matter in the NMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 015011 [hep-ph/0509024] [SPIRES].
21. A.V. Belikov, J.F. Gunion, D. Hooper and T.M.P. Tait, CoGeNT, DAMA and light neutralino dark matter, arXiv:1009.0549 [SPIRES].
22. J.F. Gunion, A.V. Belikov and D. Hooper, CoGeNT, DAMA and neutralino dark matter in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric Standard Model, arXiv:1009.2555 [SPIRES].
23. R. Kappl, M. Ratz and M.W. Winkler, Light dark matter in the singlet-extended MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 169 [arXiv:1010.0553] [SPIRES].
24. B. Zumino, Supersymmetry and Kähler manifolds, Phys. Lett. B 87 (1979) 203 [SPIRES].
25. B. Bellazzini, C. Csáki, A. Falkowski and A. Weiler, Buried Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 075008 [arXiv:0906.3026] [SPIRES].
26. B. Bellazzini, C. Csáki, A. Falkowski and A. Weiler, Charming Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 075017 [arXiv:0910.3210] [SPIRES].
27. M.A. Luty, D.J. Phalen and A. Pierce, Natural h → 4g in supersymmetric models and R-hadrons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 075015 [arXiv:1012.1347] [SPIRES].
28. C. Cheung, G. Elor and L.J. Hall, The cosmological axino problem, arXiv:1104.0692 [SPIRES].
29. G.F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Extracting supersymmetry-breaking effects from wave-function renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 511 (1998) 25 [hep-ph/9706540] [SPIRES].
30. Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [SPIRES].
31. P.F. Bedaque, M.I. Buchoff and R.K. Mishra, Sommerfeld enhancement from Goldstone pseudo-scalar exchange, JHEP 11 (2009) 046 [arXiv:0907.0235] [SPIRES].
32. T.P. Cheng, Chiral symmetry and the Higgs nucleon coupling, Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 2869 [SPIRES].
33. H.-Y. Cheng, Low-energy interactions of scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs bosons with baryons, Phys. Lett. B 219 (1989) 347 [SPIRES].
34. J.R. Ellis, K.A. Olive and C. Savage, Hadronic uncertainties in the elastic scattering of supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 065026 [arXiv:0801.3656] [SPIRES].
35. J. Giedt, A.W. Thomas and R.D. Young, Dark matter, the CMSSM and lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 201802 [arXiv:0907.4177] [SPIRES].
36. G. B́elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs2.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360] [SPIRES].
37. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Remarks on Higgs boson interactions with nucleons, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 443 [SPIRES].
38. J. Engel, Nuclear form-factors for the scattering of weakly interacting massive particles, Phys. Lett. B 264 (1991) 114 [SPIRES].
39. J.D. Lewin and P.F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys. 6 (1996) 87 [SPIRES].
40. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on light Majorana dark matter from colliders, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 185 [arXiv:1005.1286] [SPIRES].
41. Y. Bai, P.J. Fox and R. Harnik, The Tevatron at the frontier of dark matter direct detection, JHEP 12 (2010) 048 [arXiv:1005.3797] [SPIRES].
42. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on dark matter from colliders, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [SPIRES].
43. A.A. Abdo et al., Fermi LAT search for photon lines from 30 to 200GeV and dark matter implications, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 091302 [arXiv:1001.4836] [SPIRES].
44. E. Bloom and L. Latronico, Dark matter observation and Fermi, preliminary results shown at the 2011 Fermi Symposium, http://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/ symposium/2011/program/, Rome Italy May 9-12 2011.
45. Fermi-LAT collaboration, A.A. Abdo et al., Constraints on cosmological dark matter annihilation from the Fermi-LAT isotropic diffuse gamma-ray measurement, JCAP 04 (2010) 014 [arXiv:1002.4415] [SPIRES].
46. Fermi-LAT collaboration, A.A. Abdo et al., The spectrum of the isotropic diffuse gamma-ray emission derived from first-year Fermi Large Area Telescope data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 101101 [arXiv:1002.3603] [SPIRES].
47. M.L. Garde, J. Conrad and J. Cohen-Tanugi, Constraining dark matter signal from a combined analysis of milky way satellites with the fermi-LAT, preliminary results shown at the 2011 Fermi Symposium, http://fermi.gsfc.nasa. gov/science/symposium/2011/program/, Rome Italy May 9-12 2011.
48. M. Ackermann et al., Constraints on dark matter annihilation in clusters of galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, JCAP 05 (2010) 025 [arXiv:1002.2239] [SPIRES].
49. S. Zimmer, A combined analysis on clusters of galaxies gamma ray emission from cosmic rays and dark matter, preliminary results shown at the 2011 Fermi Symposium, http://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/symposium/2011/program/, Rome Italy May 9-12 2011.
50. PAMELA collaboration, O. Adriani et al., PAMELA results on the cosmic-ray antiproton flux from 60MeV to 180GeV in kinetic energy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 121101 [arXiv:1007.0821] [SPIRES].
51. I. Cholis, New constraints from PAMELA anti-proton data on annihilating and decaying dark matter, arXiv:1007.1160 [SPIRES].
52. M. Cirelli et al., PPPC 4 DM ID: a poor particle physicist cookbook for dark matter indirect detection, JCAP 03 (2011) 051 [arXiv:1012.4515] [SPIRES].
53. P. Ciafaloni et al., Weak corrections are relevant for dark matter indirect detection, JCAP 03 (2011) 019 [arXiv:1009.0224] [SPIRES].
54. G.R. Dvali, G.F. Giudice and A. Pomarol, The μ-problem in theories with gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 478 (1996) 31 [hep-ph/9603238] [SPIRES].
55. Z.G. Berezhiani and G.R. Dvali, Possible solution of the hierarchy problem in supersymmetrical grand unification theories, Bull. Lebedev Phys. Inst. 5 (1989) 55
56. [Kratk. Soobshch. Fiz. 5 (1989) 42] [SPIRES].
57. C. Csáki, G. Marandella, Y. Shirman and A. Strumia, The super-little Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 035006 [hep-ph/0510294] [SPIRES].
58. B. Bellazzini, S. Pokorski, V.S. Rychkov and A. Varagnolo, Higgs doublet as a Goldstone boson in perturbative extensions of the Standard Model, JHEP 11 (2008) 027 [arXiv:0805.2107] [SPIRES].
59. B. Bellazzini, C. Csáki, A. Delgado and A. Weiler, SUSY without the little hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 095003 [arXiv:0902.0015] [SPIRES].
60. B. Bellazzini, C. Csáki, J. Hubisz and J. Shao, SUSY digs up a buried Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 095018 [arXiv:1012.1316] [SPIRES].
61. A. Falkowski, D. Krohn, L.-T. Wang, J. Shelton and A. Thalapillil, Unburied Higgs, arXiv:1006.1650 [SPIRES].
62. C.-R. Chen, M.M. Nojiri and W. Sreethawong, Search for the elusive Higgs boson using jet structure at LHC, JHEP 11 (2010) 012 [arXiv:1006.1151] [SPIRES].
63. D. Cavalli et al., The Higgs working group: summary report, hep-ph/0203056 [SPIRES].
64. H. Davoudiasl, T. Han and H.E. Logan, Discovering an invisibly decaying Higgs at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 115007 [hep-ph/0412269] [SPIRES].
65. N. Arkani-Hamed, D.P. Finkbeiner, T.R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, A theory of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015014 [arXiv:0810.0713] [SPIRES].