Application of logistic regression and fuzzy operators to landslide susceptibility assessment in Azdavay (Kastamonu, Turkey)

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 949-964

  Ercanoglu, M ^a   Temiz, F A ^b  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Directorate of Disasters and Emergency Management   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Fuzzy operators; Landslide; Logistic regression; Susceptibility map; Western Black Sea region (Turkey)

Indexed keywords

BLACK SEA; DAMAGE PROPERTIES; FIELD STUDIES; FUZZY APPROACH; FUZZY GAMMA OPERATORS; FUZZY OPERATORS; GIS (GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM); INPUT PARAMETER; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; QUANTITATIVE METHOD; RELATIVE OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPS;

ALGEBRA; BENCHMARKING; DAMAGE DETECTION; FUZZY SET THEORY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LANDSLIDES; LITHOLOGY; RATING;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; GIS; INVENTORY; LANDSLIDE; LITHOLOGY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SLOPE DYNAMICS;

BLACK SEA; CARSAMBA; SAMSUN [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 80053130835     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-011-0912-4     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58: 21-44.
2. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H (2005) The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65: 15-31.
3. Bai SB, Wang J, Lü GN, Zhou PG, Hou SS, Xu SN (2010) GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology 115: 23-31.
4. Berkan RC, Trubatch SL (1997) Fuzzy systems design principles, building fuzzy if-then rule bases. IEEE Press, USA.
5. Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists, Modeling with GIS. Pergamon, England.
6. Can T, Nefeslioglu AH, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H, Duman TY (2005) Susceptibility assessments of shallow earthflows triggered by heavy rainfall at three catchments by logistic regression analyses. Geomorphology 72(1-4): 250-271.
7. Caniani D, Pascale S, Sdao F, Sole A (2008) Neural networks and landslide susceptibility: a case study of the urban area of Potenza. Nat Hazards 45: 55-72.
8. Chacon J, Irigaray C, Fernandez T, El Hamdouni R (2006) Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65: 341-411.
9. Chauhan S, Sharma M, Arora MK, Gupta NK (2010) Landslide susceptibility zonation through ratings derived from artificial neural network. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinf 12: 340-350.
10. Choi J, Oh HJ, Won JS, Lee S (2010) Validation of an artificial neural network model for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Earth Sci 60: 473-483.
11. Clark WA, Hosking PL (1986) Statistical methods for geographers. Wiley, USA.
12. Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. Tranportation research board, Special report 247. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 36-75.
13. Dai FC, Lee CF, Zhang XH (2001) GIS-based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: a case study. Eng Geol 61: 257-271.
14. Duman TY, Can T, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H (2006) Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environ Geol 51: 241-256.
15. Eastman JR (2009) Idrisi Taiga, guide to GIS and image processing, user's guide (Ver. 15). Clark University Press, USA, 328 pp.
16. EM-DAT (Emergency events database) (2010) http://www.emdat.be, verified in 21. 02. 2010.
17. Ercanoglu M (2005) Landslide susceptibility assessment of SE Bartin (West Black Sea region, Turkey) by artificial neural networks. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5: 979-992.
18. Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41: 720-730.
19. Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Eng Geol 75: 229-250.
20. Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C, van Asch TWJ (2004) Landslide susceptibility zoning of North of Yenice (NW Turkey) by mutivariate statistical techniques. Nat Hazards 32: 1-23.
21. Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66: 327-343.
22. Falaschi F, Giacomelli F, Federici PR, Puccinelli A, Avanzi GD, Pochini A, Ribolini A (2009) Logistic regression versus artificial neural networks: landslide susceptibility evaluation in a sample area of the Serchio River valley, Italy. Nat Hazards 50: 551-569.
23. Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning. Eng Geol 102: 99-111.
24. Gokceoglu C, Sezer E (2009) A statistical assessment on international landslide literature (1945-2008). Landslides 6: 345-351.
25. Gomez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural network in Jabonosa River basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol 78: 11-27.
26. Gorsevski PV, Jankowski P (2010) An optimized solution of multi-criteria evaluation analysis of landslide susceptibility using fuzzy sets and Kalman filter. Comp Geosci 36: 1005-1020.
27. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31: 181-216.
28. Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P, Carrara A (2000) Comparing landslides maps: a case study in the Upper Tiber basin, Central Italy. Environ Manag 25(3): 247-263.
29. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M (2006) Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81: 166-184.
30. Hutchinson JN (1995) Landslide hazard assessment. In: Proceedings of the VIth International Symposium on landslides, vol 1, Christchurch, pp 1805-1842.
31. Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol 85: 347-366.
32. Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2009) A fuzzy set based approach for integration of thematic maps for landslide susceptibility zonation. Georisk 3(1): 30-43.
33. Kawabata D, Bandibas J (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using geological data, a DEM from ASTER images and an artificial neural network (ANN). Geomorphology 113: 97-109.
34. Kirschbaum DB, Adler R, Hong Y, Lerner-Lam A (2009) Evaluation of a preliminary satellite-based landslide hazard algorithm using global landslide inventories. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9: 673-686.
35. Lee S (2007) Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 52: 615-623.
36. Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ Geol 50: 847-855.
37. Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ Geol 47: 982-990.
38. Lee S, Ryu JH, Kim LS (2007) Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models: case study of Youngin, Korea. Landslides 4: 327-338.
39. Mancini F, Ceppi C, Ritrovato G (2010) GIS and statistical analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Daunia area, Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10: 1851-1864.
40. Menard S (2002) Applied logistic regression analysis, 2nd edn. SAGE, USA, 111 pp.
41. MTA (Mineral Research and Exploration) (2004) 1/100000 scale of Turkey Geological Map (Kastamonu quadrangle). (in Turkish).
42. Nandi A, Shakoor A (2009) A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Eng Geol 110: 11-20.
43. Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C, Sonmez H (2008) An assessment on the use of logistic regression and artificial neural networks with different sampling strategies for the preparation of landslide susceptibility maps. Eng Geol 97: 171-191.
44. Ott RL, Longnecker M (2001) An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis, 5th edn. Duxbury Press, USA.
45. Poudyal CP, Chang C, Oh HJ, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya. Environ Earth Sci 61: 1049-1064.
46. Pradhan B (2010) Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross-validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. Adv Space Res 45: 1244-1256.
47. Pradhan B, Lee S (2010) Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: back propagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environ Model Softw 25: 747-759.
48. Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2009) Use of geospatial data and fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide-hazard mapping. Appl Geomat 1: 3-15.
49. Pradhan B, Lee S, Buchroithner MF (2010) A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross-application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Comput Environ Urban Syst 34: 216-235.
50. Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Vitek JD (2010) Modeling susceptibility to landslides using the weight of evidence approach: Western Colorado, USA. Geomorphology 115: 172-187.
51. Ross TJ (1995) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. Mc-Graw-Hill, USA.
52. Rossi M, Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Mondini AC, Peruccacci S (2010) Optimal landslide susceptibility zonation based on multiple forecasts. Geomorphology 114: 129-142.
53. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38: 913-920.
54. Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004a) A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: multivariate versus bivariate. Environ Geol 45: 665-679.
55. Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004b) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Eng Geol 71: 303-321.
56. Tangestani MH (2009) A comparative study of Dempster-Shafer and fuzzy models for landslide susceptibility mapping using a GIS: an experience from Zagros Mountains, SW Iran. J Asian Earth Sci 35: 66-73.
57. Ulusay R, Aydan Ö, Ki{dotless}li{dotless}ç R (2007) Geotechnical assessment of the 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Turkey). Eng Geol 89: 112-128.
58. Vahidnia MA, Alesheikh AA, Alimohammadi A, Hosseinali F (2010) A GIS-based neuro-fuzzy procedure for integrating knowledge and data in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comp Geosci 36: 1101-1114.
59. van Den Eeckhaut M, Vanwalleghem T, Poesen J, Govers G, Verstraeten G, Vandekerckhove L (2006) Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: a case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium). Geomorphology 76: 392-410.
60. van Westen CJ, van Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation-why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65: 167-184.
61. van Westen CJ, Castellanos E, Kuriakose SL (2008) Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: an overview. Eng Geol 102: 112-131.
62. Wang W, Xie C, Du X (2009) Landslides susceptibility mapping in Guizhou province based on fuzzy theory. Min Sci Technol 19: 399-404.
63. Yesilnacar E, Topal T (2005) Landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79: 251-266.
64. Yi{dotless}lmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Comp Geosci 35(6): 1125-1138.
65. Yidotlesslmaz I (2010) Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10. 1007/s12665-009-0394-9.
66. Zadeh LA (1965) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf Sci 8: 199-249.