Supporting the mobility and the adaptivity of knowledge objects by cognitive trait model

Innovations in Instructional Technology: Essays in Honor of M. David Merrill

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 29-41

  Kinshuk, ^a   Lin, Tai yu ^a   Patel, Ashok ^a,b  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053097938     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410613684     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Anderson, J. R., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). The LISP tutor. Byte, 10, 159-75.
2. Atkinson, R. C.,&Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
3. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
4. Burton, R. R., & Brown, J.S. (1982). An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. In D. Sleeman & J. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 79-98). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
5. Byrne, M. (1996). A computational theory of working memory. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi96/proceedings/doctoral/Byrne/mdb_txt.htm
6. Case, R. (1995). Capacity-based explanations of working memory growth: A brief history and reevaluation. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development (pp. 23-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Cooper, G. (1998). Research into cognitive load theory and instructional design atUNSW. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://education.arts.unsw.edu.au/CLT_NET_Aug_97.html
8. Craik, F.,&Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 671-684.
9. Cronbach, L.,& Snow, R. (1989). Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. In P. Ackerman, R. J. Sternberg,&R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and individual differences (pp. 13-60). New York: W. H. Freeman.
10. De Bra, P., Brusilovsky, P.,&Houben, G. J. (1999). Adaptive hypermedia: From systems to framework. ACM Computing Surveys, 31(4). Retrieved April 9, 2004 from, http://www.cs.brown.edu/memex/ACM_HypertextTestbed/papers/25.html
11. El-Sheikh, E. (1997). A functional student model for an ITS. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://www.cse.msu.edu/~elsheikh/cse845/paper.html
12. Felder, R. M. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
13. Huai, H. (2000). Cognitive style and memory capacity: Effects of concept mapping as a learning method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede: The Netherlands.
14. Kashihara, A., Kinshuk, Oppermann, R., Rashev, R., & Simm, H. (2000). A cognitive load reduction approach to exploratory learning and its application to an interactive simulation-based learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(3), 253-276.
15. Kearsley, G. P. (2001). Explorations in learning&instruction: The theory into practice database. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://tip.psychology.org/scandura.html
16. Kinshuk,&Lin, T. (2003). User exploration based adaptation in adaptive learning systems. International Journal of Information Systems in Education, 1(1), 22-31.
17. Kinshuk, Oppermann, R., Patel, A., & Kashihara, A. (1999). Multiple representation approach in multimedia based intelligent educational systems. In S. P. Lajpie & M. Vivet (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 259-266). Amsterdam: ISO Press.
18. Lovett, M. C., Daily, L. Z., & Reder, L. M. (2000). A source activation theory of working memory: Cross-task prediction of performance in ACT-R*. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~LAPS/pubs/Lovett00CogSysResearch2.pdf
19. LTSC IEEE. (2002). Draft standard for learning object metadata. Retrieved September 10, 2002, from http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12LOM_1484_12_1_vl_Final_Draft.pdf
20. Martin, B. (1999). Constraint-based modeling: Representing student knowledge. NewZealand Journal of Computing, 7(2), 30-38. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~bim20/paper_nzjc.pdf
21. Merrill, M. D. (1998, March/April). Knowledge objects. CBT Solutions, pp. 1-11.
22. Merrill, M. D. (2001, January-February). A knowledge object and mental model approach to a physics lesson. Educational Technology, 41(1), 36-47.
23. Merrill, M. D., & ID2 Research Team. (1996). Instructional transaction theory: Instructional design based on knowledge objects. Educational Technology, 36(3), 30-37.
24. Merrill, M. D., Li, Z.,&Jones, M. K. (1991). Instructional transaction theory: An introduction. Educational Technology, 31(6), 7-12.
25. Miller, G. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limit of our capacity for processing information. Psychology Review, 63(2), 81-96.
26. Reigeluth, C. M. (1992). Elaborating the elaboration theory. Educational Technology Research & Development, 40(3), 80-86.
27. Richards-Ward, L. A. (1996). Investigating the relationship between two approaches to verbal information processing in working memory: An examination of the construct of working memory coupled with an investigation of meta-working memory. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University.
28. Salthouse, T. A., & Babcock, R. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 763-776.
29. Scandura, J. M. (1973). Structural learning I: Theory and research. London: Gordon & Breach.
30. Schulmeister, R. (1997). Hypermedia learning systems. Theory-Didactics-Design (English version of Grundlager hypermedialer Lernsysteme. Theorie-Didaktik-Design). 2. Aktual. Aufl. R. Oldenbourg Verlag: Munchen. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://www.izhd.uni-hamburg.de
31. The Learning Curve. (n.d.). Intelligence theories. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://library.thinkquest.org/C0005704/content_la_intel_theories.php3
32. Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A.Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/
33. wiley.doc Wiley, D. A. (2002). Learning objects-A definition. In A. Kovalchick & K. Dawson (Eds.), Educational technology: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. Retrieved April 9, 2004, from http://wiley.ed.usu.edu/docs/encyc.pdf