A framework for the impact of IT on organizational performance

Business Process Management Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 846-870

  Jacks, Tim ^a   Palvia, Prashant ^a   Schilhavy, Richard ^a   Wang, Lei ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Financial performance; Information technology; IT business value; Meta analysis; Organizational impact; Productivity rate; Profitability

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053076598     PISSN: 14637154     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14637151111166213     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Barki, H., Rivard, S. and Taibot, J. (1993), "A keyword classification scheme for IS research literature: an update" in MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 209-26.
2. Barney, J. (1991), "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage" in Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99-120.
3. Bharadwaj, A. (2000), "A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation" in MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 169-96.
4. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993), "The productivity paradox of information technology" in Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 66-77.
5. Brynjolfsson, E. (2000), "Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance" in Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 23-48.
6. Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L. (1996), "Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending" in Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 541-58.
7. Carr, N.G. (2003), "IT doesn't matter" in Harvard Business Review, Vol. 81, No. 5, pp. 41-9.
8. CIO (2009), "How focusing on customers, collaboration and cost control delivers business value", CIO, 1 August.
9. Delone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992), "Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable" in Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 60-95.
10. Delone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2003), "The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update" in Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 9-30.
11. Glass, G.V. (1976), "Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research" in Educational Researcher, Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 3-8.
12. Hwang, M.I. (1996), "The use of meta-analysis in MIS research: promises and problems" in DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 35-48.
13. King, W.R. and He, J. (2005), "Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research" in Communications of the Association for Information Systems, No. 16, pp. 665-86.
14. Kohli, R. and Devaraj, S. (2003), "Measuring information technology payoff: a meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research" in Information Systems Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 127-45.
15. Luftman, J. and Kempaiah, R. (2007), "An update on business-IT alignment: 'a line' has been drawn" in MISQ Executive, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 165-77.
16. Luftman, J. and Kempaiah, R. (2008), "Key issues for IT executives 2007" in MISQ Executive, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 99-112.
17. Melville, N., Kraemer, K. and Gurbaxani, V. (2004), "Information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value" in MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 283-322.
18. Palvia, P. (1998), "Global information technology research: past, present, and future" in Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 3-14.
19. Palvia, P. and Pinjani, P. (2007), "Challenges of the global information technology management environment: representative world issues" Palvia, P., Palvia, S. and Harris, A. (Eds.), Managing Global Information Technology: Strategies and Challenges, Ivey League, Marietta, GA.
20. Palvia, P., Midha, V. and Pinjani, P. (2006), "Research models in information systems" in Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 17, No. 47, pp. 1042-63.
21. Piccoli, G. and Ives, B. (2005), "Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature" in MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 747-76.
22. Porter, M. and Millar, V. (1985), "How information gives you competitive advantage" in Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 149-74.
23. Rosenthal, R. and Dimatteo, M.R. (2001), "Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews" in Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 59-82.
24. Tallon, P.P. and Kraemer, K.L. (2007), "Fact or fiction? A sensemaking perspective on the reality behind executives' perceptions of IT business value" in Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 13-54.
25. Teece, D. (2007), "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance" in Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 1319-50.
26. Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management" in Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 509-33.
27. Urbach, N., Smolnik, S. and Riempp, G. (2008), "A methodological examination of empirical research on information systems success: 2003 to 2007", Proceedings of the Fourteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Toronto, Canada, August 14-17.
28. Urbach, N., Smolnik, S. and Riempp, G. (2009), "The state of research on information systems success - a review of existing multidimensional approaches" in Business & Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 315-25.
29. Wade, M. and Hulland, J. (2004), "The resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research" in MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 107-42.
30. Wernerfelt, B. (1984), "A resource-based view of the firm" in Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 171-80.
31. Wheeler, B. (2002), "NEBIC: a dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement" in Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 125-46.
32. Wolf, F. (1986), Meta-analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
33. King, W.R. and He, J. (2006), "A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model" in Information & Management, Vol. 2006, No. 42, pp. 740-55.