A pilot study on vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for patients with uterovaginal prolapse

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 115-119

  Von Pechmann, Walter S ^a   Aungst, Matthew J ^b   Gruber, Daniel D ^b   Ghodsi, Pari M ^a   Cruess, David F ^c   Griffis, Kenneth R ^d  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^d Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; Laparoscopy; Mesh; Pelvic organ prolapse; Time

Indexed keywords

SURGERY;

LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; LAPAROSCOPY; MESH; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; TIME;

GYNECOLOGY;

EID: 80053015279     PISSN: 21518378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318216379d     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Lane FE. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1962;20:72-77.
2. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104: 805-823. (Pubitemid 40458813)
3. Ganatra AM, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, et al. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol 2009;55:1089-1103.
4. Visco AG, Advincula AP. Robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1369-1384.
5. Paraiso MF, Rackley RR, Melek S, et al. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1752-1758.
6. Klauschie JLSBA, O'Brien MM, McBride AW. A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20:273-279.
7. Geller EJ, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1201-1206.
8. Whitehead WE, Brown MB, Brubaker L, et al. Pelvic Floor Network. Gastrointestinal complications following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197:78.e1-78.e7.
9. Visco AG, Barber MD, Myers ER, et al. Vaginal mesh erosion after abdominal sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184: 297-302. (Pubitemid 32206975)
10. Cundiff GW, Visco AG, Zyczynski HM, et al. Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:688.e1-e5.
11. Wu JM, Hundley AF, Connolly A, et al. Mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1418-1422.
12. Griffis K, Terry CL, Hale DS. Mesh erosion and abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of prior, total, and supracervical hysterectomy. J Pelvic Med Surg 2006;12:25-30.
13. Stepanian AA, Moore RD, Mattox TF. Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with our without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:188-196. (Pubitemid 351296043)
14. Patel M, Tulikangas PK. A comparison of costs for abdominal, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted sacral colpopexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20:223-228.
15. Akl MN, Giles DL, Cornella JL, et al. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc 2009;23:2390-2394.