Property is not just a bundle of rights

Econ Journal Watch

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 279-291

  Smith, Henry E ^a  

^a HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Bundle of rights; Exclusion; Law and economics; Legal realism; Property

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052990779     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1933527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ackerman, Bruce A. 1977. Private Property and the Constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
2. Alexander, Gregory S. 1997. Commodity and Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought, 1776-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
3. American Law Institute. 1938. Restatement of the Law of Property. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.
4. Anderson, Jerry L. 2007. Britain's Right to Roam: Redefining the Landowner's Bundle of Sticks. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 19: 375-435.
5. Baldwin, Carliss Y., and Kim B. Clark. 2000. Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
6. Bronin, Sara C. 2009. Solar Rights. Boston University Law Review 89: 1217-1265.
7. Chang, Yun-chien, and Henry E. Smith. 2011. An Economic Analysis of Civil versus Common Law Property. Working paper
8. Claeys, Eric R. 2009. Property 101: Is Property a Thing or a Bundle? Seattle University Law Review 32: 617-650.
9. Coase, R. H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1-44.
10. Cohen, Felix S. 1935. Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach. Columbia Law Review 35: 809-849
11. Cooper, Joseph. 2011. The Scottish Right of Access: Symmetry, Reciprocal Causation and Compromise in the Context of an Atypical Rule 3 Property Rule. Working paper
12. Dagan, Hanoch. 2011. Property: Values and Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press
13. Depoorter, Ben. 2011. Fair Trespass. Columbia Law Review 111: 1090-1135
14. Grey, Thomas C. 1980. The Disintegration of Property. In Property: NOMOS XXII, eds. J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman. New York: New York University Press, 69-86
15. Harris, J. W. 1996. Property and Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press
16. Heylighen, Francis. 1999. Advantages and Limitations of Formal Expression. Foundations of Science 4: 25-56
17. Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1913. Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. Yale Law Journal 23: 16-59
18. Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1917. Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. Yale Law Journal 26: 710-770
19. Katz, Larissa. 2008. Exclusion and Exclusivity in Property Law. University of Toronto Law Journal 58: 275-316
20. Langlois, Richard N. 2002. Modularity in Technology and Organization. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 49: 19-37
21. Lovett, John A. 2010. Progressive Property in Action: The Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003. Working paper. Link
22. Merrill, Thomas W. 1998. Property and the Right to Exclude. Nebraska Law Review 77: 730-755
23. Merrill, Thomas W., and Henry E. Smith. 2000. Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle. Yale Law Journal 110: 1-70
24. Merrill, Thomas W., and Henry E. Smith. 2001a. The Property/Contract Interface. Columbia Law Review 101: 773-852
25. Merrill, Thomas W., and Henry E. Smith. 2001b. What Happened to Property in Law and Economics? Yale Law Journal 111: 357-398
26. Merrill, Thomas W., and Henry E. Smith. 2007. The Morality of Property. William and Mary Law Review 48: 1849-1895
27. Merrill, Thomas W., and Henry E. Smith. Forthcoming. Making Coasean Property More Coasean. Journal of Law and Economics. Link
28. Mossoff, Adam. 2003. What Is Property? Putting the Pieces Back Together. Arizona Law Review 45: 371-443
29. Newman, Christopher M. Forthcoming. Transformation in Property and Copyright. Villanova Law Review. Link
30. Penner, J. E. 1996. The "Bundle of Rights" Picture of Property. UCLA Law Review 43: 711-820
31. Penner, J. E. 1997. The Idea of Property in Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press
32. Radin, Max. 1938. A Restatement of Hohfeld. Harvard Law Review 51: 1141-1164
33. Rubin, Edward L. 1984. Due Process and the Administrative State. California Law Review 72: 1044-1179
34. Rule, Troy A. 2010. Shadows on the Cathedral: Solar Access Laws in a Different Light. University of Illinois Law Review 2010(3): 851-896
35. Sanchez, Ron, and Joseph T. Mahoney. 1996. Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product Organization Design. Strategic Management Journal 17(Special Issue Winter): 63-76
36. Schroeder, Jeanne L. 1994. Chix Nix Bundle-O-Stix: A Feminist Critique of the Disaggregation of Property. Michigan Law Review 93: 239-319
37. Simon, Herbert A. 1981. The Sciences of the Artificial. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
38. Smith, Henry E. 2002. Exclusion Versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights. Journal of Legal Studies 31: S453-S487
39. Smith, Henry E. 2003. The Language of Property: Form, Context, and Audience. Stanford Law Review 55: 1105-1191
40. Smith, Henry E. 2004. Exclusion and Property Rules in the Law of Nuisance. Virginia Law Review 90: 965-1049
41. Smith, Henry E. 2007. Intellectual Property as Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information. Yale Law Journal 116: 1742-1822
42. Smith, Henry E. 2008. Governing Water: The Semicommons of Fluid Property Rights. Arizona Law Review 50: 445-478
43. Smith, Henry E. 2009. Mind the Gap: The Indirect Relation between Ends and Means in American Property Law. Cornell Law Review 94: 959-89
44. Williams, Joan. 1998. The Rhetoric of Property. Iowa Law Review 83: 277-361