Essential pages

Proceedings - 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2009

Volumn 1, Issue , 2009, Pages 173-182

  Swaminathan, Ashwin ^a   Mathew, Cherian V ^b   Kirovski, Darko ^c  

^a QUALCOMM INC   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT   (United States)

^c MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Coverage; Learning queries; Redundancy elimination; Web page ranking; Web search

Indexed keywords

COVERAGE; LEARNING QUERIES; REDUNDANCY ELIMINATION; WEB PAGE RANKING; WEB SEARCHES;

REDUNDANCY; SEARCH ENGINES; WEBSITES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 80052986091     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WI-IAT.2009.33     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. WWW, 1998.
2. S.E. Robertson and K. Sparck-Jones. Relevance weighting of search terms. Document Retrieval Systems, Vol.3, 1988.
3. S. Lawrence and L. Giles. Context and page analysis for improved Web search. IEEE Internet Computing, Vol.2, (no.4), pp.38-46, 1998.
4. E. Agichtein, et al. Improving Web Search Ranking by Incorporating User Behavior. ACM SIGIR, 2006.
5. A.N. Langville and C.D. Meyer. Deeper Inside PageRank. Internet Mathematics, Vol.1, (no.3), pp.335-80, 2003.
6. J. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. ACM SODA, 1998.
7. K. Collins-Thompson and J. Callan. A language modeling approach to predicting reading difficulty. HLT/NAACL, 2004.
8. D. Harman. Overview of the TREC 2002 novelty track. TREC, 2003.
9. O. Zamir and O. Etzioni. Grouper: a dynamic clustering interface to Web search results. Computer Networks, Vol.31, pp.1361-74, 1999.
10. A. Broder. A Taxonomy of Web Search. SIGIR Forum, Vol.36, (no.2), 2002.
11. D.E. Rose and D. Levinson. Understanding User Goals in Web Search. WWW, 2004.
12. P. Pudil, et al. Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol.15, (no.11), pp.1119-25, 1994.
13. H. Chen and D.R. Karger. Less is more: probabilistic models for retrieving fewer relevant documents. ACM SIGIR, 2006.
14. J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. The use of MMR, diversitybased reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. ACM SIGIR, 1998.
15. C. Zhai, et al. Beyond independent relevance: Methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval. ACM SIGIR, 2003.
16. B. Zhang, et al. Improving Web Search Results Using Affinity Graph. ACM SIGIR, 2005.
17. S.E. Robertson and K.S. Jones. Simple Proven Approaches to Text Retrieval. Tech. Report TR356, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory, 1997.
18. W. B. Frakes and R. Baeza-Yates. Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms. Prentice Hall, 1992.
19. C.J. van Rijsbergen, et al. New models in probabilistic information retrieval. London British Library R&D Report, no.5587, 1980.
20. P. Schauble. Multimedia Information Retrieval. Springer, 1997.
21. List of stop words, http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/idom/ir resources.
22. R.O. Duda, et al. Pattern Classification. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000.
23. T.H. Cormen, et al. Introduction to Algorithms, Second Edition. MIT Press and McGraw-Hill, 2001.
24. R.A. Baeza-Yates and B.A. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison Wesley, 1999.
25. D.K. Harman. Common Evaluation Measures. Text Retrieval Conference, 2005.
26. K. Jarvelin and J. Kekalainen. IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. ACM SIGIR, 2000.