Advertising by attorneys: New developments

Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 67-75

  Whitman, Douglas ^a   Singh, Surendra N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052985757     PISSN: 10641734     EISSN: 21647313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10641734.1997.10505058     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andrews, L.B. (1981), Birth of a Salesman: Lawyer Advertising and Solicitation, Chicago, IL: American Bar Association Press.
2. Baird, Charles W. (1977), Advertising by Professionals, Ottawa, IL: Greenhill Publishers.
3. Baird, Charles W. Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977).
4. Baird, Charles W. Bigelow v. Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 (1975).
5. Bloom, Paul N. (1977), "Advertising in the Professions: The Critical Issues," Journal of Marketing, 41 (July), 103-110.
6. Bloom, Paul N. Board of Trustees of State University of New York v. Fox, 492 U.S. 469 (1989).
7. Bloom, Paul N. Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York, 447 U.S. 557 (1980).
8. Dubin, Lawrence (1995), National Law Journal (January 9), A21-A22.
9. Dubin, Lawrence Edenfield v. Fane, 113 S.Ct. 1792 (1993).
10. Dubin, Lawrence Goldfdrb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. 773 (1975).
11. Dubin, Lawrence Ibanez v. Florida, 114 S.Ct. 2084 (1994).
12. Dubin, Lawrence In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978).
13. Dubin, Lawrence In re R.M.J., 455 U.S. 191 (1982).
14. Mandell, Richard P. (1993), "Regulation of Commercial Speech: Did the 1993 Supreme Court Decisions Clarify the Scope of First Amendment Protection?" Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 159-163.
15. Mandell, Richard P. Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of Illinois, 496 U.S. 91 (1990).
16. Petty, Ross D. and Robert J. Kopp (1995), "Advertising Challenges: A Strategic Framework and Current Review," Journal of Advertising Research, 35, 2, March/April, 41-55.
17. Podgers, James (1995), A.B.A. Journal (March), 94.
18. Preston, Ivan L. (1994), The Tangled Web They Weave: Truth, Falsity, and Advertisers, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
19. Preston, Ivan L. (1989), "The Federal Trade Commission's Identification of Implications as Constituting Deceptive Advertising," University of Cincinnati Law Review 57,4:1243-1310.
20. Reed, O. and D. Whitman (1988), A Constitutional and Policy Related Evaluation of Prohibiting the Use of Certain Nonverbal Techniques in Legal Advertising, B.Y.U. Law Review, 265.
21. Russo, J. Edward, Barbara L. Metcalf., and Debra Stephens (1981), "Identifying Misleading Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 2, 119-131.
22. Russo, J. Edward, Barbara L. Metcalf., and Debra Stephens Semler v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U.S. 608 (1935).
23. Russo, J. Edward, Barbara L. Metcalf., and Debra Stephens Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association, 486 U.S. 466 (1988).
24. Smith, Robert E. and Tiffany S. Meyer (1980), "Attorney Advertising: A Consumer Perspective," Journal of Marketing, 44 (Spring), 56-64.
25. Smith, Robert E. and Tiffany S. Meyer Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748 (1976).
26. Smith, Robert E. and Tiffany S. Meyer Went For It v. Florida Bar, No. 94-226, 1995, U.S. Lexis 4250 (U.S. S.Ct. June 21,1995).
27. Smith, Robert E. and Tiffany S. Meyer Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U.S. 626 (1985).