Character-based leadership, context and consequences

Leadership Quarterly

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 984-988

  Quick, James Campbell ^a   Wright, Thomas A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Character; Consequences; Context; Leadership

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052969372     PISSN: 10489843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.017     Document Type: Note

References (26)

1. Allport G.W. Personality and character. Psychological Bulletin 1921, 18:441-455.
2. Allport G.W. Personality: A psychological interpretation 1961, Holt, New York, Original work published 1937.
3. Andersson L.M., Pearson C.M. Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review 1999, 24:452-471.
4. Bettleheim B. Freud and man's soul 1983, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
5. Butchvarov P. Metaphysics. The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy 1997, 489-492. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. R. Audi (Ed.).
6. Cooper C.L., Quick J.C., Quick J.D., Gavin J.H. Strength of character: Exceptional leadership in a crisis. Inspiring leaders 2006, 272-295. Rutledge, Taylor & Francis, London. R. Burke, C.L. Cooper (Eds.).
7. Emerson R.W. Essays 1904, Houghton, Mifflin and Company, New York.
8. Hannah, S., & Avolio, B. (in press). The locus of leader character. The Leadership Quarterly.
9. Hannah S., Uhl-Bien M., Avolio B., Cavarretta F. A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts. The Leadership Quarterly 2009, 20:897-919.
10. Himmelfarb G. The demoralization of society 1994, Vintage Books, New York.
11. Hunter J.W. The death of character: Moral education in an age without good or evil 2000, Basic Books, New York.
12. James W. The letters of William James 1920, The Atlantic Monthly Press, Boston. J. Henry (Ed.).
13. Kets de Vries M. Reflections on character and leadership 2009, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK.
14. Parry K.W. Grounded theory and social process: A new direction for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly 1998, 9(1):85-105.
15. Peterson C., Park N., Hall N., Seligman M.E.P. Zest and work. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2009, 30:161-172.
16. Peterson C., Seligman M.E.P. Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification 2004, Oxford University Press/Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, New York.
17. Rokeach M. The nature of human values 1973, The Free Press, New York.
18. Simon H.A. The sciences of the artificial 1999, MIT, Cambridge, MA. 3rd ed.
19. Smith A. The theory of the moral sentiments 1759, A. Kincaid and J. Bell, Edinburgh, Scotland.
20. Taylor F.W. The principles of scientific management 1911, W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York.
21. Thorndike E.L. Human nature and the social order 1940, MacMillan, New York.
22. Wright T.A. Character assessment in business ethics education. Toward assessing business ethics education 2010, 361-380. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC. D.G. Fisher, D.L. Swanson (Eds.).
23. Wright T.A., Goodstein J. Character is not "dead" in management research: A review of individual character and organizational-level virtue. Journal of Management 2007, 33:928-958.
24. Wright T.A., Huang C.C. Character in organizational research: Past directions and future prospects. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2008, 29:981-987.
25. Wright, T. A., & Quick, J. C., (in press). The role of character in ethical leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly.
26. Wright T.A., Wright V.P. How our values influence the manner in which organizational research is framed and interpreted. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2000, 21:603-607.