Groundwater dependent ecosystems. Part II. Ecosystem services and management in Europe under risk of climate change and land use intensification

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 782-793

  Kløve, Bjørn ^a,b   Allan, Andrew ^c   Bertrand, Guillaume ^d   Druzynska, Elzbieta ^e   Ertürk, Ali ^f   Goldscheider, Nico ^g   Henry, Sarah ^c   Karakaya, Nusret ^h   Karjalainen, Timo P ^a   Koundouri, Phoebe ⁱ   Kupfersberger, Hans ^j   Kvœrner, Jens ^b   Lundberg, Angela ^k   Muotka, Timo ^a   Preda, Elena ^l   Pulido Velazquez, Manuel ^m   Schipper, Peter ⁿ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF BIOECONOMY RESEARCH   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

^e CRACOW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^f ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^g KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^h ABANT IZZET BAYSAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

ⁱ ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Greece)

^j JOANNEUM RESEARCH   (Austria)

^k LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^l UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

^m UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

ⁿ WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Ecosystems; Groundwater; Management; Policy

Indexed keywords

DRINKING WATER; GROUND WATER;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; AQUIFER; ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPE; HABITAT; IRRIGATION (AGRICULTURE); LAND BIOME; LAND USE; ORGANISM COMMUNITY; PLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER POLLUTION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 80052964110     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alley W.M., Leake S.A. The journey from safe yield to sustainability. Ground Water 2004, 42:12-16.
2. Belton V., Stewart T.J. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Blanco-Gutierrez I., Varela-Ortega C., Flichman G. Cost-effectiveness of groundwater conservation measures: a multi-level analysis with policy implications. Agric. Water Manage. 2011, 98(4):639-652.
4. Boulton A.J. Chances and challenges in the conservation of groundwaters and their dependent ecosystems. Aquat. Conserv. 2005, 15:319-323.
5. Boulton A.J., Fenwick G.D., Hancock P.J., Harvey M.S. Biodiversity, functional roles and ecosystem services of groundwater invertebrates. Invertebr. Syst. 2008, 22:103-116.
6. Brown J., Wyers A., Aldous A., Bach L. Groundwater and biodiversity conservation: a methods guide for integrating groundwater needs of ecosystems and species into conservation plants in the Pacific Northwest. The Nature Conservancy Report 2007, 176. The Nature Concervacy.
7. Chee Y.E. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 120:549-565.
8. Danielopol D.L., Griebler C., Gunatilaka A., Notenboom J. Present state and future prospects for groundwater ecosystems. Environ. Conserv. 2003, 30:104-130.
9. de Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M.J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41:393-408.
10. Eamus D., Froend R., Loomes R., Hose G.C., Murray B.R. A functional methodology for determining the groundwater regime needed to maintain the health of groundwater-dependent vegetation. Aust. J. Bot. 2006, 54:97-114.
11. EC, 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7.
12. EC, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1.
13. EC, 2003. Guidance Document No 12. Horizontal Guidance on the Role of Wetlands in the Water Framework Directive. European Communities, Luxembourg.
14. EC, 2006. Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration. OJ L 372, 27.12.2006, p. 19.
15. EC, 2009/147/EC. Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds. 26.1.2010. Official Journal of the European Union, p. 25.
16. Ec, 2007a. Natura 2000 newsletter number 22.
17. EC, 2007b. European Commission DG Environment, LIFE and Europe's wetlands, Restoring a vital ecosystem. LIFE III EC, Luxembourg.
18. EC, 2008. Groundwater Protection in Europe, p. 35.
19. EC, 2009. WHITE PAPER, Adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action. Brussels, COM (2009) 147/4.
20. EC, 2010a. 'Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC); Guidance document No. 26: Guidance on risk assessment and the use of conceptual model for groundwater'.
21. EC, 2010b. Report from the commission in accordance with Article 3.7 of the Groundwater Directive 2006/118/EC on the establishment of groundwater threshold values, Brussels, 5.3.2010 C(2010) 1096 final, p. 10.
22. European Union, Council (EU), 2009a. 'A mid-term assessment of implementing the EU Biodiversity Action Plan and Towards an EU Strategy on Invasive Alien Species'. Brussels, 25 June 2009, 11412/09.
23. European Union, Committee of the Regions (EU 2009b). 'Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on a new impetus for halting biodiversity loss'. 80th plenary session 17-18 June 2009, DEVE-IV-039.
24. Fornés J., Rodríguez J.A., Hernández N., Llamas M.R. Possible solutions to avoid conflicts between water resources development and wetland conservation in the 'La Mancha Húmeda' biosphere reserve (Spain). Phys. Chem. Earth Part B 2000, 25:623-627.
25. Goldscheider N., Hunkeler D., Rossi P. Review: microbial biocenoses in pristine aquifers and an assessment of investigative methods. Hydrogeol. J. 2006, 14:926-941.
26. Greenpeace, 2006. Press release May 22, 2006. from www April 2011. http://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/press-centre/press-releases2/plan-to-preserve-life-will-nee-2.
27. Görlach B., Interwies E. Economic Assessment of Groundwater Protection: A Survey of the Literature 2003, Ecologic, Berlin.
28. Heinz I., Pulido-Velazquez M., Lund J.R., Andreu J. Hydro-economic modeling in River Basin Management: implications and applications for the European Water Framework Directive. Water Resour. Manage. 2007, 21:1103-1125.
29. Kløve, B., Ala-aho, P., Guillaume, B., Boukalova, Z., Ertürk, A., Goldscheider, N., Ilmonen, I., Karakaya, N., Kupfersberger, H. Kvœrner, J., Lundberg, A., Mileusnić, M., Moszczynska, A., Muotka, T., Preda, E., Rossi, P., Siergieiev, D., Šimek, J., Wachniew, P., Widerlund, A. Groundwater dependent ecosystems. Part I. Hydroecological status and trends. Environ. Sci. Policy, in this issue.
30. Kværner J., Kløve B. Tracing sources of summer streamflow in boreal headwaters using isotopic signatures and water geochemical components. J. Hydrol. 2006, 331:186-204.
31. Lavapuro M., Lipponen A., Artimo A., Katko T.S. Groundwater sustainability indicators: testing with Finnish data. Boreal Environ. Res. 2008, 13:381-402.
32. Lee C.H. The determination of safe yield of underground reservoirs of the closed basin type. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1915, 78:148-251.
33. Lopez-Gunn E., Martinez-Cortina L. Is self-regulation a myth? Case study on Spanish groundwater user associations and the role of higher-level authorities. Hydrogeol. J. 2006, 14:361-379.
34. Martinez-Santos P., de Stefano L., Llamas M.R., Martinez-Alfaro P. Wetland restoration in the Mancha Occidental Aquifer, Spain: a critical perspective on water, agricultural, and environmental policies. Restor. Ecol. 2008, 16:511-521.
35. MEA Millenium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis 2005, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
36. Meyerhoff J., Dehnhardt A. The European Water Framework Directive and economic valuation of wetlands: the restoration of floodplains along the River Elbe. Eur. Environ. 2007, 17:18-36.
37. Oliver M., Sorkin L., Kaschl A. Science and policy interface: the LIFE programme and its links to the EU Water Framework Directive. Environ. Sci. Policy 2005, 8:253-257.
38. Paetzold A., Warren P.H., Maltby L.L. A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services. Ecol. Complexity 2010, 7:273-281.
39. Pallemaerts M., Wilkinson D., Bowyer C., Brown J., Farmer A., Farmer M., Herodes M., Hjerp P., Miller C., Monkhouse C., Skinner I., ten Brink P., Adelle C. Drowning in Process?. The Implementation of the EU's 6th Environmental Action Programme Report for the European Environmental Bureau 2006, 67. IEEP, London.
40. Schlager E. Policy making and collective action: defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Pol. Sci. 1995, 28:243-270.
41. Sophocleous M. Managing water resources systems: why " safe yield" is not sustainable. Ground Water 1997, 35:561.
42. Todd D.K. Groundwater Hydrology 1959, John Wiley Pub., New York.
43. TEEB, 2008. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: An interim report.
44. TEEB, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB.
45. Turner R.K., Brouwer R., Crowards T.C., Georgiou S. The economics of wetland management. Managing Wetlands. An Ecological Economics Approach 2003, 73-107. Elgar, Cheltenham. R.K. Turner, J.C.J.M. van den Bergh, R. Brouwer (Eds.).
46. WATECO, 2003. Guidance Document No 1. Economics and the Environment-The Implementation Challenge of the Water Framework Directive. European Communities, Luxembourg.